Musing of a very old traffic plod .........
By law any restriction has to be signed.
IN this case a temporary traffic order was made under Sect 16a Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 - temporay event speed limit and one should view this as it should set out chapter and verse what is involved in defined length (start and finish for signing) and may contain items on signing requirement.
A speed restriction has to be signed in accordance with signs stipulated in Traffic SIgns General Directions 2002.
Traffic Signs Manual No 3 (Regulationary Signs 2008) is the bible to LA as to how signing has to be done. Chapter 14 deals with speed limits.(This of interest to poster and should be read)
1.16 sight line of sign whole face should be preserved (Not in this case as 45 degree mentioned)
2.1 SIgning as prescribed -
14.7 both sides of road (unless exeption in Traffic Order ?)
14.1 IF not lawfully placed may be unenforceable.
All in all some points that could possibly be used in argument signing defective (may be nit picking I know?????) but these with as stated photo to provide visual submission as opposed to verbal would have enhanced any appeal.
The presence of Plod at scene does not imply lawfullness as it would be a miracle if they had inspected the traffic order before enforcing or even fully aware of Chaper 3 but it is prudent on them to ensure signing lawful before issuing FPN..
Back to nodding....zzzzzzzzz
dvd
|