What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
MG ZS 2017 - Different performance 2 identical cars - oldroverboy.

I met a guy with the identical model to mine, same spec ... pre WLTP..

very unhappy with his, so said try mine, different car he said, so told him about the software update and the crank position fault...

Note to add, he uses BP ultimate, mine runs on Asda and euro E10 when in belgium.

My car is as it should be, his drives like a shed, but his local dealer is carp, and mine is brilliant, Have suggested he goes to my dealer.

MG ZS 2017 - Different performance 2 identical cars - Metropolis.
Perhaps his wasn’t run in properly?
MG ZS 2017 - Different performance 2 identical cars - madf
Perhaps his wasn’t run in properly?

Running in? So 1970s..:-)

MG ZS 2017 - Different performance 2 identical cars - oldroverboy.
Perhaps his wasn’t run in properly?

Running in? So 1970s..:-)

Mine had certainly had a varied bit of usage, bought at 2161 miles, ex demo...now 7600..

Several trips to france and belgium with varying speeds up to the legal limits over there, so up to 85mph... when warmed up, have "floored it" (or driven like i nicked it.. aka italian tune up.

The last few mile off the A12 slow down nicely to give the car time to cool, even though it's non turbo,

So in short a good usage mixture. Since the crank sensor replacement, no funny warnings from traction control when driving very enthusiastically ..

Running, in? yes I suppose it is now, and doesn't HJ say to "run in " at various engine revs/speeds?

MG ZS 2017 - Different performance 2 identical cars - Big John

I think running in has a lot to do with it. I used to work for a company many moons ago that had lots of similar company cars (Astras, Cortinas and Escorts) and it was interesting to compare cars and their keepers. Performance varied substantially between identical models - myself it seemed to be the "livelier" drivers that had much nippier cars. I used to borrow two 1.6 Cortinas (same spec/age) - one was a bit flat but the other flew!

When I got a brand new 89 1.3 Astra (not my money so I didn't car too much) - despite the strict gentle run in regime at the time I decided to really vary the driving including giving it some beans very early on. This car became very lively considering it was only a 1.3 and when I left the company the next driver commented as to how lively it was without any prompting from me.

Fast forward to 2001 and I bought a brand new Octavia 1.416v 75ps (was my money and very cheap as the engine size wasn't popular!) - this was bought as a cheap as chips high mileage commute car. I decided to run in as above and after about 3000 miles this, considering it's supposed a slug, become rather lively - Infact it was the car of choice to tour Europe for over a decade. Fast forward to today and 134k miles later, my son has it now - it still holds its own on a motorway and burns little oil - not bad considering this is an engine that has had bad PR on this site in the past with reports of oil burning and pistons failing at 30k miles! Saying that I'm a stickler for regular servicing and usually use higher octane petrol.

MG ZS 2017 - Different performance 2 identical cars - SLO76
With cars in the 80’s and 90’s it was common to see a noticeable difference in performance between two supposedly identically specified models but as manufacturing standards improved it pretty much disappeared. Running in isn’t required these days but it did make a difference back in yon olden days.
MG ZS 2017 - Different performance 2 identical cars - Engineer Andy
Perhaps his wasn’t run in properly?

Running in? So 1970s..:-)

Don't you have to use the full rev range (under a certain level) and not labour the engine in its first X miles (as per the handbook) to avoid problems later on, including acceleration flat spots? Admitedly my Mazda3 is 13yo, but that's what it said in the handbook.