Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - gordonbennet

Took the good lady's Forester XT in for MOT today, clean pass, apparently they still use a decelerometer on full time 4x4's (i did wonder if they had some sort of free wheel device for the other axle by now), bet he enjoyed a blast in the little pocket rocket.

Interesting the emission test results.

LPG ppm vol, max limit 1200, actual value 90

CO %vol max limit 3.500, actual value 0.000

Be very glad to pay up the £550 VED required for all that pollution :-))

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - corax

On the other hand mine has been borderline on emissions for the past two years. A change of job see's it doing shortish journeys all the time, and an italian tuneup isn't working. It'll be going to a diagnostics expert soon to find out the cause as it could be anything considering it's age. It still drives beautifully, but doesn't run on LPG of course.

How do you find the Forester compared to your previous Outback GB, as I've never driven one? I get the feeling that you preferred the Outback, of course I might be wrong. I'm guessing it's a smoother, more laid back ride.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - gordonbennet

That's odd Corax about the emissions, hope you have a good Subaru specialist nearby, that's something we're going to have to find for the future too.

The Forester rides harder on its 17" wheels, slightly better on the 16" winter set currently on and i have been tempted to re-wheel on 16" permanently, Foz more nimble much easier for parking, all round visibility helped by van style rectangular mirrors people who drive modern designs can only dream of, more road roar than the Outback though.

Yes i probably prefer the more laid back driving comfort of the Outback, but SWMBO loves the Foz, and one of the reasons being that the only distinguishing item to tell anyone what engine its got is the intercooler vent on the bonnet, other than that it could be the smallest NA engined model, no sporty looking twin exhausts to give any impressions, an ideal sleeper which suits her.

Despite the rear load area being slightly shorter, due to the squared off rear its much better overall for the dogs, heater is miles better than the Outback too for some reason, very quick to warm up, controls and switches are simple and effective.

The one thing i'm a bit wary of is just how quickly it can take off from rest, despite being TC autobox it's much more instant than any TC auto i've driven before, presumably just as torque engages the turbo is spooling up so unless you exercise restraint it would be a car that could easily catch the unwary out in tight traffic.

Its about the same on fuel as the 3 litre Outback was, the brakes are not muti pistoned huge Brembos or anything (though it does have Brembo friction materials all round cos i like how they 'feel') but are more than adequate for the job and it sticks to the road like glue no matter what, all in all i'm not sure what would prise her hands of this rather unassuming little estate car.

One surprise was just how large the oil drain hole is, hot oil comes out like a fire hose, it now sports a Fumoto drain valve which will make oil changes much easier, i thought the Landcruiser could empty its belly quickly of hot oil, but this thing's worse.:-)

Edited by gordonbennet on 04/02/2019 at 18:29

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - Happy Blue!

I had a Forester XT 2003 for two years before I ran an Outback 3.0 for three years. Same opinions as GB. The Outback was smoother, but the Forester had a superb driving position; like sitting in an upright armchair. Forester was noisier, sharper and more draining on a long motorway run, but for the vast majority of my mileage it was simply the perfect car.

Of all the cars I have driven for over 35 years, I think the Forester and the S-Max would be the only ones I would really want to have back.

Yes they might want some slight updates to suit modern driving (in fact I can think of almost nothing in the S-Max to improve other than change the SatNav input to a Qwerty keyboard), but I would have them both back right now.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - Manatee

The place I went to with my last Outlander used the Tapley meter too. The tester just used 25 yard run across the yard, he didn't even brake especially hard.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - gordonbennet

The place I went to with my last Outlander used the Tapley meter too. The tester just used 25 yard run across the yard, he didn't even brake especially hard.

I did ask was it still a Tapley meter, he said a similar type of instrument.

I'm a little surprised they haven't come up with a way of letting the other axle turn whilst the axle being tested is on the rollers, a short brake enough to make the Tapley happy isn't going to show any potential shortfall in an odd brake starting to deteriorate.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - corax

GB, the Forester needed a front lambda sensor and maf sensor. The catalyst is getting tired but is OK when hot, the two components fitted were enough to make it within limits for now. My diagnostics man was impressed with the condition of the car, given that it was 14 years old and still using all original components. Both sensors that I bought were OE Denso. False economy going for cheap items.

I agree about the heating. Very quick to warm up and gets really hot, also the aircon is powerful, the icing on the cake would be cold air though face vents and heat through the floor wells simultaneously but that facility has almost died out now.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - gordonbennet

Very pleased to hear she's sorted Corax, so no worries about another few years of use if you are so inclined with just the cost of a CAT maybe at some point.

We swapped cars yesterday, i refill it with LPG every other week or so as the 56ppl LPG station is on my way home from work, 'twas an enjoyable journey to work at 3.30 am :-)

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - corax

3.30am, motoring bliss.

Just to add, there are three cats on the car. Around 2004, the emission regs got tighter and Subaru added a 'precat', unfortunately my model lies within those years. It resides in the up pipe before the turbo. The cat can break up with age and send bits through the turbo, although some think that the intercooler helps to filter it before that happens.

Yours won't have it, they went back to a standard up pipe but added the secondary air pump instead.

I'm not sure whether I want to go to the trouble of replacing it with an earlier standard up pipe to remove the risk. I'm planning on keeping the car for the next couple of years, so we'll see :-)

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - concrete

I would like GBs' comments about a Subaru, also other Suburu owners too. I have a diesel XC60 which goes back in 2020. With the current demonisation of diesel and the potential problems with DPF etc I am thinking of changing fuel to petrol. I do need a good powerful car though because I tow a caravan which weighs about 1400Kg loaded. Diesel is ideal of course but being run out as far as I can see. Petrol engines struggle with the initial tug to get going but I am sure that can be acceptable. I am thinking of buying instead of leasing, so I want to keep the vehicle for a long time. But only doing about 8-10K miles per annum a diesel is not really suited to keeping. So the question is this: (at last I hear you say!) Would a Subaru petrol be a good investment for both tugging power and longevity? Given my circumstances your comments regarding the Suburu brand seem to indicate it is a good make to keep. I know that Kia and Hyundai offer long warranties, but like other manufacturers the petrol engines seem puny. Alright for every day use but not much use for towing. Any ideas would be welcome. I will start to look around later this year with a view to buying early next.

Cheers Concrete

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - gordonbennet

Concrete, yes i think Subarus are very good indeed, and the Outback looks at first glance like the ideal vehicle, but the 2.5 petrol is NA and that appears to be the only engine option in the UK, coupled to the CVT box and what that would be like for towing ability and noise i do not know, if a 2.5 manual was available that would i suspect be a better bet.

In some ways the slightly smaller Forester might offer better towing because you can still have the 2.0 litre turbo engine, which should in theory have much better mid range pull and when not towing would be an enjoyable road car.

The vehicles are great IMHO, but i'd want to test drive one towing a heavy trailer to see the towing ability of both engines, and i have no doubt whatever the maker's and Real MPG figures say on here, that your towing fuel consumption is going to be far worse with a petrol no matter who makes it.

I assume the CVT is reliable even with lots of towing work, and i have no doubt you'll be scouring the internet to find out if it is good enough long term.

Not a simple choice for you now if you are definately ruling out Diesel, so many of the new turbocharged petrol engines are small in capacity, when for towing you really want some decent CC's to get the combination moving in the first place, i know from my work just how frustrating small engines heavily turbocharged to produce a satisfactory headline BHP figure can prove in the real world, where a larger engine even if the BHP figure is the same as the smaller engine, is eons more flexible making driving pleasurable instead of a chore.

As ever, my suggestion would be Landcruiser (Diesel) :-)

Edited by gordonbennet on 13/03/2019 at 20:27

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - hillman

GB are you still interested in my vehicle ?

Subaru 2006 reg 2.5 litre automatic Legacy / Outback.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - gordonbennet

Thanks Hillman, we would have been very interested if we hadn't bought the Forester for SWMBO, which she really likes.

Time finally come to renew? another Subaru for you?

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - hillman

Sadly, I find that it's time to give up driving. The car is blocking my driveway so I'm trying to find a good home for it. It's a prime takeover for somebody who values good cars and Subarus in particular. Not everyone fits that bill. Lots of young men would like a powerful car like that but i'm not interested in adding to the statistics.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - gordonbennet

Sadly, I find that it's time to give up driving.

Now that is bad news, though that day must i suppose come to us all.

Hope you find the right buyer, had this news been twelve months earlier we would have been beating a path to your door on my next day off because i know you've looked after, good luck with the sale, someone is going to get one of the best AWD estate cars.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - hillman

I find that I have not many buyers. The car is 12 years old and although it's in tip top condition it's not worth very much.

Like I said, my best chance of selling it is to a young man, although whether they'd be interested in an automatic is another thing. Automatics are looked upon as 'not sporty'. The article that sold me onto automatics was written by a writer named LJK Setright. He wrote well.

The young men in my family have all crashed their first cars in their inexperience. Although the only young woman has not,, her boyfriend has done it it for her.

Subaru Forester XT 2008 - emissions seem good - Happy Blue!

There was never a better writer about motoring than Leonard Setright. He waxed lyrical about Honda Preludes with 4WS, Golf GTIs (mk 2) and the way society changed because of the car. A great loss to automotive literature.

He also persuaded my family to look kindly upon Subaru so much so we ended up with three.