Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Hello all,

Apologies for this second thread - I am trying to buy a reliable mpv with good mpg.

I have had alot of advice, but also alot of conflicting advice, and it comes down to the following engines:

1.3 cdti (fiat doblo)

1.6 hdi (ford focus cmax/xsara picasso)

1.8 tdci -( focus cmax)

2.0 tdci - (focus cmax/xsara picasso)

Anybody tell me which is the most reliable, and which to definitely avoid and why?

Heard good and bad for each engine, please could someone rate these with details for me?

Thanks!

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - Bromptonaut

A google on turbo failures for the 1.6 units turns up posts of various French/PSA specific forums and those for Ford. Seems to be an issue with detritus in the oil blocking an ill placed strainer,

I've not got time to read through them all or source data on production dates/engine numbers for affected units. Quite a lot on French Cars Forum, including a PSA specialist in Stoke who offers his phone number. Thread starts here

Edited by Bromptonaut on 07/04/2014 at 12:33

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - daveyK_UK

out of the list, avoid the 1.8 ford unit.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

What is wrong with the ford 1.8? Can't find any details anywhere, but you are not the first to warn me against it.

So it could be:

1.3 diesel fiat doblo

vs

2.0 ford focus cmax or citroen xsara picasso

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Ok so I'm definitely avoiding the 1.6 hdi - due to all turbo issues etc.

So it is between:

1.3 cdti - anyone know real mpg from the doblo?

1.8 tdci - anyone had or know of problems/issues with this? anyone know true mileage?

2.0 tdci - what is true mpg of citroen xsara picasso?

Thanks

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Ok - so the doblo is out. It has a bad safety score.

So it is between

1.8 tdci - still waiting to hear whats wrong with this one. for ford focus cmax

2.0 tdci/hdi - for ford focus cmax or citroen xsara picasso

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - Collos25

The 1.6hdi is probably the best diesel in your list just look at some of the mega miles some have done in cars for sale .They have made millions of these engines just because a few have problems and I should imagine some of these are self inflicted its no reason to not look or buy one.Company I worked for in Germany had a fleet of 1.6hdi peugeot estates not one had a turbo problem and the least mileage was over 150k miles

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - Bromptonaut

The problem with avoiding the 1.6 Hdi is that there are lot of them about and you therefore limit available vehicles. MAy be worth investing time in undrstanding which variants actually had the problem.

It's not universal but OTOH the variants affected seem to be early ones most likley to be in your price range.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

yup - that's the problem with a 4.5k budget. I'm limited to 2006/2007 models

They say its because of late servicing and oil changes.

But elsewhere they say it is because of the way the engine fits the car, bad connections etc.

But either way - if I am to limit the possibility of buying a car that will turn out to be a money pit - I think I should avoid.

Still not got any details on the 1.8s.

Heard good things about the 2.0s though.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - skidpan

We had a 1.6 TDCi C-Max for 5 years, it was a late 2005 Euro 3 car with no PDF. It gave us excellent service, only problem was a cracking alternator belt, cost £35 fitted. We had it serviced exactly as per Fords schedule using the correct Ford spec oil.

When we came to swap it another 1.6 TDCi C-Max was at the top of the list, however, there were problems. The 2010 Euro 4 car had a DPF with the Eolys additive and Ford were quoting £300 a top up every 37,500 miles, another motoring expense to be avoided. Even so we drove one but when we got back into our 5 year old example it was far better, walked away.

So after looking on the Ford web site and spotting that the TDCi 1.8 did not have a DPF we though we would try one of those.The mpg looked slightly poorer but no DPF to worry about. The first was a slug compared to our 1.6 so tried another, exactly the same, walked away.

We eventually bought a Kia Ceed SW 1.6 CRDi. Its a far better car, more comfortable, way quicker, more refined, more economical and the luggage space is much better and easier to access. Ours is a late 2010 which does have a DPF but there are no known issues with Kia DPF's. Your budget would only stretch as far a 2008 car probably )possibly a 2009 car) but if you bought carefully and got one with a full Kia service history (preferably) it would still have some warranty remaining.

Worth a look, I was sceptical when I walked into the Kia showroom but just over 3 years later still not disapointed.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Thanks

Looked at the Kia- out of my price range and not great mpg.

I have narrowed it down now to:

Ford Focus, or Ford C Max (later version)

1.8 tdci

or 2.0 tdci.

Again - still heard nowt about the 1.8 litre.

Anybody have any details on why I keep being warned off the 1.8?

Is the mpg any different between the two?

Thanks

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - skidpan

Looked at the Kia- out of my price range

No its not, your £4500 budget should get you a good 2008 Ceed SW CRDi.

not great mpg

We get 51 mpg out of our Ceed SW, we got 45 mpg out of the 1.6 TDCi C-Max, why is that not great?

Again - still heard nowt about the 1.8 litre.

I said in my last post that the 1.8 was a poor drive compared to our 1.6 TDCi. Very unrefined engine and unresponsive.

Is the mpg any different between the two?

Never owned the 1.8, as I said above it was poor on test drive. But the official figures show its at least 5 mpg worse.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Sorry - got confused with a different one I was researching.

The Kia is ok - but looks too narrow. I need a car that will fit two car seats and an older child in the back.

As per the 1.8 - I don't mind the quality of drive so much - mpg and reliability are higher on my list really.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - skidpan

The Kia is ok - but looks too narrow. I need a car that will fit two car seats and an older child in the back.

The C-Max is not wide in the rear, the Ceed is just as big in that respect with better legroom.

If you want a car big enough for 2 child seats and an older child you need to be looking at something bigger. A Mondeo Estate or S-Max should be investigated.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

I saw a c-max - was just right for us, got a new born arriving in next 2 weeks, one child about to go to a booster seat, the other is 11. So if the c-max is big enough... maybe the Ceed is an option after all. ! Would certainly solve the mpg issue.

There is one 1 mile from me, not an sw, but should offer same width? I will go see it now if I can.

Edited by samuelodog on 07/04/2014 at 17:36

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Place closed - cant see Ceed till tomorrow.

In terms of stats - Ceed is 1790 wide, C-Max is 2022.

Also - there doesn't seem to be many estates about, not near me anyway! Seems a low enough mileage (60,000) would cost me at least £5000.

On paper though, it is nearly the perfect car. Just availabilitiy for the price, and I'll have to check width tomorrow in person. Thanks for the suggestion though.

C-Max is my back-up.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Skoda roomster 1.4 tdi anyone?

Edited by samuelodog on 07/04/2014 at 19:34

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

I saw the Skoda.

Too narrow.

I saw the Kia ceed. -Too narrow also.

I think it has to be the C Max. I think I will go for 2.0 out of cowardice.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - kerbed enthusiasm

Any reason why you want to choose from this list of engines? Toyota Verso might also fit your needs.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Looking reliability, good mpg and wide enough to fit 3 kids in car seats.

Toyota verso is too expensive for my 4.5k budget.

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - daveyK_UK

Hyundai matrix 1.5 diesel

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - skidpan

In terms of stats - Ceed is 1790 wide, C-Max is 2022.

This is why you cannot rely on published stats, there is not standard way of measuring cars.

The Ceed will be the width across the body, the C-max will include mirrors. They give very different figures.

We have owned both and know the C-Max has no more interior width than the Ceed. They both fit into the garage (just) with the mirrors in mormal position.

Simly do what we do. Go and have a look at all the cars on your list and take a tape with you to check important dimensions. Drive them all and then make your own mind up. Its you that has to live with it for several years.

I might have found the C-Max 1.8 TDCI poor compared to the 1.6 TDCi but a really good 1.8 will probably be a better buy than a knackered 1.6.

If you want something bigger than a Ceed or C-Max get an S-Max or Galaxy.

Edited by skidpan on 10/04/2014 at 09:27

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - samuelodog

Hi - I have been to see all these cars now. With a tape measure AND the car seats.

The main issue is not actually width, but the shape of the seats.

Cars like the Ceed seem to tilt the car seats inwards, with raised edges pushing them over towards the centre.

The C Max's shape may be of similar width, but the seats tilt away from each other, leaving more room in the centre. It's very subtle but it make a world of difference - about 2 inches wider for the middle seat.

So I'm back on the C Max trail.

Still I am unsure about the 1.8s.

It seems that all that is wrong with them is that they are an 'unpleasant drive'.

I think I need to drive one!

Ford C-MAX - 1.8 tdci vs 2.0 tdci (HDI) vs 1.6 hdi vs 1.3 CDTi - meandering

I have the 1.8tdci in a 2005 Focus. It's only done 55,000, no problems, no particular issues that I'm aware of.