What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - 72 dudes

Making our way from Suffolk to Ludlow today on our way to a holiday cottage.

Decided to go A14/A428/A421/M1/M45/A46/M42 etc to avoid the tedious bit of the A14

Anyway we'd been on the M1 for maybe 10 minutes, when 'bong' followed by dash message "possible loss of tyre pressure, check tyres".

Pulled into Northampton Services, visual check and tyres looked OK. Airline at the fuel station not working as they are pulling up half the forecourt. Stupidly had not taken either my tyre inflator or a gauge.

Proceeded to Watford Gap at HGV speed, airline working, tyre pressures spot on (allowing for being warm) Grrrrrrr!

Re-set TPMS via computer as required.

WHY oh WHY etc?

I've read about TPMS being a pain before but any backroomers had similar?

Edited by 72 dudes on 04/06/2018 at 19:24

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Engineer Andy

I did read that some Mazdas had an issue with TPMS if they got a bit muddy (its in the Good & Bad reviews section for the 3, 5 or 6). Had to laugh at that. Maybe its the same here, given they may use generic parts for such things.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - skidpan

I've read about TPMS being a pain before but any backroomers had similar?

Had TPMS on a total of 6 cars since 2005 and had the warning light come on 3 times in that period. On each occation the tyres had been fine when checked with my trusty gauge within a couple of weeks max. On each occation the tyres looked fine on a visual walk round. But on each occation the trusty gauge said that one of the tyres had low pressure and close inspection revealed a screw in the tread each time.

What a pain. It resulted in me pumping the tryre to the correct pressure on 2 occations and driving strait to the local tyre shop. The other time I had to fit the spare because it was Sunday afternoon.

If I did not have such a pesky system fitted I would never have known. But there again I could have been killed in a huge fireball when the car crashed after a blow out.

As I said, modern technology can be such a pain. Why ever did they introduce front brakes on cars. Just more to wear out and go wrong.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Bolt

The Civic and Jazz have that problem where you get false alerts, but I just where possible stop to check and reset, it was annoying for a while but have got used to it now

I know there is a software update for it, but was told Honda are still working on it so I`ll wait untill the next one

at least I don`t get as many alerts for TPMS as proximity warnings ie too close to other cars(not my fault when cars cut you up)

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Leif
I recently hit a huge pot hole, and the tyre pressure warning went off almost immediately. I could feel the handling changing, and a mile on pulled in and changed the flat tyre. Without that warning I might have taken a corner too fast for a deflating tyre, and come a cropper. So I for one am a huge fan of this technology. It’s on a VW Polo incidentally, no idea if their system is better or not.

The emergency braking, though, is dangerous. It goes off every few weeks for zero reason. Once it braked while cornering, scared me witless, and it could have caused a crash.
Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Manatee

It would be interesting to know which of these stories refers to the ABS sensing type, and which to systems with pressure sensing valves.

I haven't yet had a false alarm from either the Roomster or MX-5 (ABS type) or the Outlander (pressure sensor type). The Roomster had a very slow puncture for ages and that set it off a few times,

My MX-5 is a 2017; the 2018 model has switched to pressure sensors.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - daveyjp
I had false alarms with Mercedes ABS system a couple of times.

I also found out they don't work when the tyre is pancake flat after being stood overnight and you drive off.
Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Bolt

Civics is ABS

I had 4 new tyres on it 10k miles ago and no sensors in the wheel so has to be ABS, I assume Jazz is as well.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - skidpan

It would be interesting to know which of these stories refers to the ABS sensing type, and which to systems with pressure sensing valves

2 of my alerts were with ABS systems, the 3rd sensor type.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - catsdad
The Civic's went off driving of an overnight ferry to Spain. I pulled over and all seemed well so I drove the few miles on to our hotel. Checking next mornng I found one tyre was a small amount down (5psi down as I recall). So its pretty sensitive.
Unfortunately it was the St James holiday weekend so all garages were shut for three days. I wax amazed to get it repaired for 5 euros and he even checked the pressures of the three remaining tyres.
As for its being a problem with Hondas, googling suggests its moreso with the Jazz.
My Civic's has never malfunctioned but it does need reset when worn tyres are renewed. I assume its because it detects a new rotational relationship.
Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Mike H

Our 2016 model CR-V does the same. When we travel to the UK, I set the tyre pressures cold before we leave home. After around 30kms we hit the motorway, then after another 20kms or so the warning comes up almost without fail. I don't quite understand why, because assuming it's ABS controlled, if all the tyres heat up, there shouldn't be one that's rotating at a different speed which would cause the TPMS warning to be triggered. Never happens on the return journey!

Edited by Mike H on 04/06/2018 at 22:18

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - davecooper

Had the warning come up on a SEAT Leon a while back. It was on the stretch of the M25 that is notorious for giving the feeling of having a puncture. So it felt like a puncture and indicated a puncture. However, once I managed to get off the morway I found nothing wrong at all, same pressure as the others.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Engineer Andy

Surely TPMS should have a temperature sensor as well a pressure sensor for the tyre, so it knows what the cold (presumably minimum) pressure should be and what the equivalent is when running? As others have said, when a tyre is use, it warms up, and thus so does the air inside, raising the working pressure by as much as 20%. PV=mRT and all that.

Otherwise the system could think the pressure is fine is someone inflates their tyre to the handbook figure mid-journey when they should add, say, 10% for the effect of the warm tyre.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - skidpan

Surely TPMS should have a temperature sensor as well a pressure sensor for the tyre, so it knows what the cold (presumably minimum) pressure should be and what the equivalent is when running? As others have said, when a tyre is use, it warms up, and thus so does the air inside, raising the working pressure by as much as 20%. PV=mRT and all that.

Otherwise the system could think the pressure is fine is someone inflates their tyre to the handbook figure mid-journey when they should add, say, 10% for the effect of the warm tyre.

If its ABS TPMS its based on rotation and as 4 tyres heat it will be the same (unless you are hooning round a track with all RH or LH corners). There should be no warning.

With valve based TPMS the warning should come on with pressure drop not pressure increase (pressure increases when driving) so IMHO if you get a warning after driving any distance you either have puncture or a fault.

For example. On our Superb the nomal rear pressure is 32 PSI. For a car loaded with 5 persons and luggage its 40 PSI. Add in a pressure increase for hot day motorway driving and they probably reach 45 PSI. Never seen a warning yet.

But I occationally recalibrate ours should any sensors have adjusted themselves from factory settings. This needs doing on a strait road otherwise it could affect the rotation speeds if its ABS based.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - 72 dudes

With valve based TPMS the warning should come on with pressure drop not pressure increase (pressure increases when driving) so IMHO if you get a warning after driving any distance you either have puncture or a fault.

That was my original point really - no fault, no puncture and no pressure drop. But I do take your point that I was being overly critical of modern technology!

But I occationally recalibrate ours should any sensors have adjusted themselves from factory settings. This needs doing on a strait road otherwise it could affect the rotation speeds if its ABS based.

That's interesting SP. On the Audi system, it will only let you re-set the TPMS when stationary and ignition only on. The Superb system will be more up to date, given the Q3 has been around for 5 years.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - FoxyJukebox

I wonder how many potential buyers of cars with TPMS saw the function as a tipping moment of truth to actually buy?

Surely good drivers can feel or indeed hear when they have a puncture? Perhaps not.

But I suppose it might be quite handy if it alerted you to slow puncture?

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - gordonbennet

Surely good drivers can feel or indeed hear when they have a puncture? Perhaps not.

Agreed, with each and every electronic stage of the dumbing down of driver skills, most newer drivers who didn't learn the previous generation of vehicle lose another layer of that seat of the pants feel for whats happening underneath and in the drivetrain...

ie newer drivers don't have a clue about cadence braking or keeping by feel through toes and bum the wheels on the point of lock up because ABS does it all now...until it doesn't when they find themselves on snow ice or loose surface, and no longer needing to power correctly and gently through wet bends cos one of many three letter acronyms does it all for you...again until it doesn't.

As for vehicle choices due to such faff, i have no intention of buying any more modern than the two vehicles we currently own, a 2005 Landcruiser and 2008 Forester, if one of those meets a write off fate i will search out similar replacements, most unlikely to ever go newer than 2010.

Edited by gordonbennet on 06/06/2018 at 11:36

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - TheGentlemanThug

Surely good drivers can feel or indeed hear when they have a puncture? Perhaps not.

Agreed, with each and every electronic stage of the dumbing down of driver skills

Agreed again. The more work the car supposedly does, the less skill it takes to drive one properly.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - Manatee

I wonder how many potential buyers of cars with TPMS saw the function as a tipping moment of truth to actually buy?

Surely good drivers can feel or indeed hear when they have a puncture? Perhaps not.

But I suppose it might be quite handy if it alerted you to slow puncture?

The ABS type works well enough, although ours (Roomster) doesn't tell you which tyre is low. I don't think resetting on bendy roads matters as it derives the roatational relationship over a long distance - c. 10 miles I think.

I was concerned that the wheel sensor type on the Outlander might be more likely to play up, but I've had no alerts in 10,000 miles so far.

We've had several slow punctures on a couple of our cars over the last few years. I blame frequent visits to the tip, they have all been nails or screws.

I can feel a soft rear tyre before it gets too bad, it upsets the steering feel in bends. Front is more difficult for me and I put this down the the now common small or negative roll radius steering geometry which stops the steering pulling when a tyre is soft. In fact most of them will probably still steer and brake in a straight line with a completely flat tyre. In the days when power steering was the exception and most cars had a large positive roll radius (it made the steering lighter) the steering / brakes always seemed to be pulling one way or the other.

Audi Q3 - Annoying technology today - skidpan

But I occationally recalibrate ours should any sensors have adjusted themselves from factory settings. This needs doing on a strait road otherwise it could affect the rotation speeds if its ABS based.

As I suggested it needs to be strait road if its ABS based, too many bends (especially in town) will not allow it to set correctly.

I don't think resetting on bendy roads matters as it derives the roatational relationship over a long distance - c. 10 miles I think.

On BMW and Mini it was only a short distance, definitely not 10 miles.

That's interesting SP. On the Audi system, it will only let you re-set the TPMS when stationary and ignition only on. The Superb system will be more up to date, given the Q3 has been around for 5 years.

I would guess that a system that requires you to be stationary with ignition on will be a valve based system.

Not sure what system the Superb (and Fabia) have. Experience has taught me that metal valves = valve based, rubber valves = ABS. Both Superb anmd Fabia have rubber but I thought that the only type permitted now is the valve based and VAG were using a different type of TPMS valve. Was shown a new Passat price list the other day where it states a pressure drop monitoring system is standard but full TPMS is £180 extra. To me that suggests ABS standard, valves £180. Anyone spending the extra money would be mad.

Need to pop into Skoda one day to see if they will supply a service book (all you get are the receipts) and will ask what ABS it is. Probably no idea.