What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Bought a car with a new engine without realising.
I've bought a used 2010 Skoda Octavia VRS.
When purchased, I purchased on the assumption that at 21,000 miles the car was on its original engine. I later found out that only one month before purchase the engine was replaced by Skoda under warranty as an "Exchange" engine. I think its a new engine, but Skoda did not use these words when I asked them.
I've phoned the dealer who says it can actually be seen as a better car with a new engine than one which has done the full 21,000 miles. I am worried about the impact a cars service history which shows an engine change at less than 21,000 miles will have on any future part-exchange value?
Does the fact the car has had a new engine affect its value at all? Should the dealer have still charged the market value for the car by withholding this information? I'd have assumed that the car was worth less?
I do know that by the mere fact the dealer didn't disclose the vital information that the engine was replaced, in doing so the dealer has committed a criminal offence under Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (misleading omission).
I am just wondering if I should keep the car, if I can get its true part-exchange value on it in 2 - 3 years time or should I avoid the car and put a claim in for a full refund from my credit provider using Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974?
Thanks in advance for any reply to this question John.
When purchased, I purchased on the assumption that at 21,000 miles the car was on its original engine. I later found out that only one month before purchase the engine was replaced by Skoda under warranty as an "Exchange" engine. I think its a new engine, but Skoda did not use these words when I asked them.
I've phoned the dealer who says it can actually be seen as a better car with a new engine than one which has done the full 21,000 miles. I am worried about the impact a cars service history which shows an engine change at less than 21,000 miles will have on any future part-exchange value?
Does the fact the car has had a new engine affect its value at all? Should the dealer have still charged the market value for the car by withholding this information? I'd have assumed that the car was worth less?
I do know that by the mere fact the dealer didn't disclose the vital information that the engine was replaced, in doing so the dealer has committed a criminal offence under Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (misleading omission).
I am just wondering if I should keep the car, if I can get its true part-exchange value on it in 2 - 3 years time or should I avoid the car and put a claim in for a full refund from my credit provider using Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974?
Thanks in advance for any reply to this question John.
Asked on 21 September 2012 by DJ_K
Answered by
Honest John
Shouldn't be a problem. Some of these engines had a severe oil consumption problem so the engine in this one was probably replaced for that reason. You bought a car with a new engine rather than an engine that had done 21,000 miles. How can that be a problem?
Similar questions
I have just taken delivery of a brand new diesel Peugeot 508 SW. It arrived with the towing eye cover missing.
This was pointed out to them by me and a replacement was sourced and fitted within 5 hours....
I bought new a 2011 Kia Carens diesel three weeks ago. In the first week I couldn’t get fifth gear so the garage dropped the gear box to correct . Two or three weeks later the problem returned with 1st...
I purchased a new Volkswagen 3 door 1.4 Polo from a local dealer in Hampshire (using VW Solutions Finance) in September 2011.
Upon handover we noticed that the instrument panel didn't fit properly and...
Related models
Well thought of by owners. Huge boot. Spacious and comfortable cabin. Reasonable to drive. Efficient Greenline TDI models.