What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Grate expectations
I was driving along a fairly new all-purpose road that runs parallel to the motorway, in the dark, no streetlights and some way from habitation. It was my misfortune to drive over a road drain that in fact had no cover in place; the grate/cover was on the verge.
Both tyres and alloys on the nearside of my 2-year-old car were trashed, plus the suspension, leaving me with a repair bill just south of £1k. A friend told me that there were problems with these gullies, with the covers becoming displaced as traffic went over them. This information led me to make an FOI request of the county council which elicited the response that "the metal pins that secure the gully grate within the frame had fractured, which could allow the grates to be lifted out of the frame by the action of passing traffic."
The gullies/grids have since been modified by a road repair crew. I attempted to recover my repair costs from the county council but their insurers tell me that the road was recently constructed by a third party (a leading UK support services company) and that the council has a 5 year agreement with it to maintain the road in question and therefore it is the 3rd party’s responsibility to ensure that the road was in a reasonably safe condition.
I am fearful of failing in my attempts to extract my £1k from the 3rd party and wonder if you can offer any advice in case law or common law that I could use in my covering letter to them to be sure of success.
Both tyres and alloys on the nearside of my 2-year-old car were trashed, plus the suspension, leaving me with a repair bill just south of £1k. A friend told me that there were problems with these gullies, with the covers becoming displaced as traffic went over them. This information led me to make an FOI request of the county council which elicited the response that "the metal pins that secure the gully grate within the frame had fractured, which could allow the grates to be lifted out of the frame by the action of passing traffic."
The gullies/grids have since been modified by a road repair crew. I attempted to recover my repair costs from the county council but their insurers tell me that the road was recently constructed by a third party (a leading UK support services company) and that the council has a 5 year agreement with it to maintain the road in question and therefore it is the 3rd party’s responsibility to ensure that the road was in a reasonably safe condition.
I am fearful of failing in my attempts to extract my £1k from the 3rd party and wonder if you can offer any advice in case law or common law that I could use in my covering letter to them to be sure of success.
Asked on 25 January 2010 by FW, via email
Answered by
Honest John
Our legal adviser, Lucy Bonham Carter, responds: “The insurer is wrong. It does not matter what arrangements the council has made with the constructor, private road mender or council employee - the claim is against the responsible authority - the Highways Agency for motorways and trunk roads - and in this case the council - who have a *statutory duty* to ensure the safety of any adopted road.
"The claimant's action is thus clearly against the council and they must (in turn) seek recourse from the third party if they fitted faulty covers. As with potholes these are not easy cases to bring. The council and their insurer will attempt to invoke Section 58 of the Highways Act which allows a council or highways agency to defend claims on the basis that they had taken reasonable measures to ensure that problems are found and dealt with swiftly.
"To oppose this the claimant would need to show the council or their contractor had not complied with the terms or spirit of the Code of Practice - "Well Maintained Highways and the Complementary Guidance - a copy of which can be downloaded from: www.ukroadsliaisongroup.org/roads/code_of_practice...m If the pins were a "known fault" at the time of the accident and the council (and their contractor) had not undertaken immediate rectification measures the claim has a good prospect for success."
"The claimant's action is thus clearly against the council and they must (in turn) seek recourse from the third party if they fitted faulty covers. As with potholes these are not easy cases to bring. The council and their insurer will attempt to invoke Section 58 of the Highways Act which allows a council or highways agency to defend claims on the basis that they had taken reasonable measures to ensure that problems are found and dealt with swiftly.
"To oppose this the claimant would need to show the council or their contractor had not complied with the terms or spirit of the Code of Practice - "Well Maintained Highways and the Complementary Guidance - a copy of which can be downloaded from: www.ukroadsliaisongroup.org/roads/code_of_practice...m If the pins were a "known fault" at the time of the accident and the council (and their contractor) had not undertaken immediate rectification measures the claim has a good prospect for success."
Tags:
driving
road damage
Similar questions
I had a light accident in my Jeep in a tight country lane, and the damage was restricted to the rear o/s door. After insurance company issues, the car was delivered to their preferred repairer.
All well...
You frequently mention the state of the roads, suing the council for damage to vehicles etc. where negligence can be proven that they knew of a pothole and did nothing to repair it. I have a story perhaps...
My recently purchased Peugeot 3008 comes with an electric parking brake as standard. This is the first car I have owned with this type of brake, and I am struggling to master it. With the car on a level...