Another update...a month later.
As they was not responding to my letters. Trading standards sent me the address of the registered office for the limited company. That was the last of their input.
Using MCOL, all the court letters went to the resisted trading address but there was no response. Judgement issued then entered. Warrant enforce issued then entered. This process took about 5 weeks.
After 7 days when the warrant enforcement (court bailiffs) where they are meant to update me but never I chased the courts. They put me in touch with the bailiff. The bailiff said the address given was an empty property and nothing of value would be there. He then called the defendant warning him of the judgement against him, to which he started auguring about warranty to him.
Seeing that as a dead end, some-one has suggested using 'The Sheriff’s Office'. I have contacted these people and they seem to know a lot about court processes and their bailiff procedure. I have filled out the forms for them and sent my judgement certificate. I also explained the address situation which they said was fine (and sadly common) as they will go to many addresses.
Just wondering if anyone has debt recovered by this company or heard of them? They have a show on the BBC coming in the New Year.
Also, if anyone knows if it’s legal to have a limited company registered to an address which is not actually in use. If the limited company complain they never received any documents, sure it’s their fault for supplying a ‘fake’ address.
Many Thanks again…hope someone finds my story useful in someway.
(Think I could write a book about this whole saga!)
|