I was thinking more the pass and shuffle
Sounds like a dance to me.
jamie, I was about to say Saab invented the second gear, but you beat me to it. You've been doing your homework...........................at last!.
|
In my opinion the IAM and a lot of officialdom is bonkers here.
Moving off in slippery conditions is all about not breaking traction. Using second to move off requires a longer period of clutch slippage, so more wear and tear. And frankly, a greater chance, not a lesser one, of wheel-spin for a lot of drivers.
As has been pointed out above, a lot of cars now have an antistall circuit, so will pull away at idle. So the gentlest of take offs are easily performed - and that is what it is all about.
|
I like my Skoda because it will just trickle along at walking pace (when I want to go slowly) without my foot on the accelerator. :)
|
Here's some more indispensable advice:
"Ensure you have de-icer and a scraper. Before setting off, make sure you clean any ice or condensation from all the windows so that your visibility is clear."
Talk about taking the watch off your wrist and telling you the time!
I'm going to start an organisation for the benefit of drivers who have been stabbed by their cars.
|
Here's some more indispensable advice:
"Ensure you have de-icer and a scraper. Before setting off, make sure you clean any ice or condensation from all the windows so that your visibility is clear."
Talk about taking the watch off your wrist and telling you the time!
I'm going to start an organisation for the benefit of drivers who have been stabbed by their cars.
unthrottled, sadly there are lot of people who lack common sense and need to be told to clean their windows. I see enough morons who just clear a tiny patch on the windscreen and then venture down the road. Unfortunately there are still inconsiderate, brainless, lazy moronic motorists.
The best moron story I've heard is when a motorist was involved in a car accident when it was icy. When the motorist mentioned to the attending policeman he didn't realise it was icy the policeman asked of the car was kept outside? Yes. Did you use de-icer on the winds this morning? Yes
|
Trilogy-it is pointless. The people who listen to the IAM, know to scrape the windows and don't need to be told. The people who do need to be told aren't listening to the IAM.
|
The type of motorist who needs to be told simple (not advanced) things is not going to be logging onto the IAM, or even this site for that matter so they'll never read it. The argument of 'thick people need to be told' is not a justification for the IAM acting in such a patronising way. Basic things like 'clean your windows' should be learned by your second driving lesson, its not the place of an organisation pretending to be 'advanced' to be spouting nonsense babble.
Thats the key point, the IAM are not advanced at anything. They just teach the same basic stuff as any ordinary driving instructor but using more complicated words to make themselves sound special.
|
Sorry Bintang - b***** Microsoft again. Try using Google Chrome or Firefox - we don't want to lose you!
In the old days of lower gearing it was quite normal to start in second. But even when I learned to drive in the 60s (in a Morris 1100) you could feel that it was more of a strain on rhe clutch than it had been in a 50s' Austin. Thus I never started in 2nd and never have.
If you want to save on gearchanges, better to do so further up the line - say, 1,2,3,5 or 1,2,4,6.
Edited by Avant on 28/01/2012 at 16:12
|
Skip shifting is definitely the best way. But cars aren't trucks. 1st is not a crawler gear-that is avoided if not heavily laden.
Modern cars are just too heavy-especially with NEDC friendly gearing...
I find 1,2,5 to be quite useful from a standing start up to about 40. If downhill, 1,3,5 seems to do the trick. Does sdepend on the gearing though...
|
jamie 747 'Thats the key point, the IAM are not advanced at anything. They just teach the same basic stuff as any ordinary driving instructor but using more complicated words to make themselves sound special.'
LOL!
Edited by Trilogy on 28/01/2012 at 16:48
|
Jamie 747?
Inflation gets to us all.
Or has he become a Jumbo?
Or has he improved to 74.7 pence in the pound?
|
Jamie 747?
Inflation gets to us all.
Or has he become a Jumbo?
Or has he improved to 74.7 pence in the pound?
He's been eating a lot of biscuits lately.
I'm sure the IAM will advise that it's best to keep some biscuits in the car in case all of the instructions become too much and you collapse in a sobbing heap, unable to drive through stress at all that scraping and creeping in snow.
|
Jamie 747?
Inflation gets to us all.
Or has he become a Jumbo?
Or has he improved to 74.7 pence in the pound?
He's been eating a lot of biscuits lately.
I'm sure the IAM will advise that it's best to keep some biscuits in the car in case all of the instructions become too much and you collapse in a sobbing heap, unable to drive through stress at all that scraping and creeping in snow.
As do Saabs for those cold snowy winters. I'm sure Jamie 767 knows that Saab were the first to include biscuiit tins in their cars as a gift for buyers at time of purchase. N.B. JamieConcorde is the forum's resident Saab expert. All Saab queries, and while on the subject of his expertise, he is the font of all knowledge for the IAM Test, so all Saab and IAM queries should be addressed to JamieSpitfire!!!
|
I'm sure the IAM will advise that it's best to keep some biscuits in the car
Bobbin-that would be most unwise. Biscuits contain mono-unsaturated fats which can lead to high cholestral, elevated blood pressure and raise the risk of a heart attack. If you were to suffer a heart attack whilst driving, it could be a cause for distraction.
If you think you have suffered a heart attak, you should phone 999 immediately.
|
"IAM. Should be renamed ICM. Institute of Clueless Motorists. 10-to-2, cadence braking, starting off in wrong gear. Don't make me laugh. :)"
You really do not have a clue what you are talking about-try taking your advanced test and then come back and comment, if you pass of course,remember the examiner is always a police class 1 licence holder, the highest driving qualification there is.
|
You really do not have a clue what you are talking about-try taking your advanced test and then come back and comment
Im assuming you've done the test, so can you tell us what is 'advanced' about it please?
Just because the examiner has a Police driving qualification (which means very little, judging by the Police forces' accident statistics published last week) doesnt mean the IAM's test means anything.
|
If the advanced driving test is so useful, why are insurers so indifferent to it?
I would put a Class 1 LGV up there among the high classes of driving-but I don't see the Road Haulage Association dispensing advice about demisting windscreens.
|
If the advanced driving test is so useful, why are insurers so indifferent to it?
Possibly because its not a properly recognised qualification. It means nothing. Some insurers do pay attention to it but in reality theres such a small amount of people with IAM qualifications that the data field is quite irrelevent. Didnt we work out in the past only 0.3% of Britain's motorists have this qualification? The rest of us seem to manage alright without it.
I would put a Class 1 LGV up there among the high classes of driving-but I don't see the Road Haulage Association dispensing advice about demisting windscreens.
Because their members actually are advanced, so they dont need to be told simple things. People who drive Buses, LGV's, HGV's etc are the most skilled in the road in my view. I've seen a lorry driver manouvere a 44 tonne truck into the back of a Tesco in town in one move. To put it in perspective, most people would struggle to do this turn in question in a car.
And how Bus Drivers manage to thread those things through towns is beyond me.
|
747, 'Thats the key point, the IAM are not advanced at anything. They just teach the same basic stuff as any ordinary driving instructor but using more complicated words to make themselves sound special.'
you made the statement, its up to you to support it with evidence. Bet you can't!
|
you made the statement, its up to you to support it with evidence. Bet you can't!
Um, I think the onus is normally on the claimant to provide positive proof, rather than on a skeptic to disprove an unsubstantiated claim.
|
Um, I think the onus is normally on the claimant to provide positive proof, rather than on a skeptic to disprove an unsubstantiated claim.
Quite. If the IAM and its supporters think their test and qualifications are really advanced and special then its up to them to make their case and prove it.
The fact is i've asked 'what makes them advanced?' on here many times and nobody has given me an answer yet.
Probably because they dont have one.
|
If the advanced driving test is so useful, why are insurers so indifferent to it?
I would put a Class 1 LGV up there among the high classes of driving-but I don't see the Road Haulage Association dispensing advice about demisting windscreens.
Not all insurers are indifferent - I get a better insurance deal through the IAM than I can get elsewhere - good cover, lower excess, low premium.
I do agree though, that basic driving education shouldn't be a function of the IAM - mainly because it's a waste of membership fees as basic advice falls on deaf ears.
Compared to the low standard of driving necessary to pass/keep a basic driving licence, the IAM test is advanced - I'd be surprised if BackRoomers consider their own skills as merely adequate so it's quite likely that the test isn't advanced compared to skills here.
Edited by RT on 29/01/2012 at 07:57
|
Um, I think the onus is normally on the claimant to provide positive proof, rather than on a skeptic to disprove an unsubstantiated claim.
Indeed, jamie is the claimant.
|
Guys, there's a lot of hissing about the IAM on this forum and it's a little disappointing considering the type of motorist that we expect here. Is anyone here actually a member?
I am and I love driving fast and enjoying my car. I don't hold my hands at 10 to 2 and I was never told to. I start driving using the clutch alone in the snow that's currently outside and I have no problems. I don't use 2nd gear because I haven't got stuck doing what I'm doing. The advice I was given by the IAM was simply that 2nd gear is a useful rescue tip if you do slip.
The IAM taught me how to read the road and the traffic with the intention of driving in a way that was sympathetic to my car and that would get me from A to B safely and, it now appears, faster than the general stream of traffic.
I'm nothing special and I don't consider my driving to be either but the IAM is a good thing. I get massively reduced insurance premiums - don't forget that only 12 months ago, the majority of the insurance industry was penalising drivers who were risk averse enough to fit cold weather tyres,like much of Europe and North America, when it was cold! So just because Sheila's Wheels and Admiral don't give someone a reduction, you can't extrapolate.
Almoat without exception, the IAM advice pages that are posted on HJ are excruciatingly simple and slightly embarrassing for all of us who read these pages, but it does reflect the standard of driving out there. It's white and icy outside but I still see others driving without lights on, before sunrise, peering through little peep-holes in their windscreen.
So please let's have less of the denegrating talk about the IAM. They do a good job but the majority of motorists know nothing about what they actually stand for and I agree that the advice post recently on this site doesn't really help that.
|
|