To some extent this worries me as it is not the first case I have heard of.
If on the sale of a car one has complied with the instructions of VC5 or sent a letter to DVLA notifying them of sale of vehicle then the law IMHO has been complied with.
The if no acknowledgement contact DVLA has no authority at law in fact the case of Duncan Peek at Horsham County Court in April 2010 it was stated that DVLA had NO STATUTORY POWER for anyone to ring them. Likewise in the case James COLLINS in October 2009 (http://www.tinyurl,com/3xnrdme) ( Liquid Knights long post) at Clerkenham District Court one had not to prove to DVLA that letter re SORN sent. Up to DVLA to prove otherwise.
Whilst there is statutory authority to impose an £80 surcharge if after 1 months expiration of RFL SORN is not declared - no Court involved, I do not know of the statutory authority for DVLA to impose a fine regarding the offence of failing to notify change of ownership. Such a fine can only IMHO be levied after a Couit case. Neither am I aware that DVLA can issue a FPN for this offence.
If anyone can update me where they get this authority in the letter of the law I would be obliged.
In the meantime I have written to DVLA for clarification. Will they write back?????????
DVD
Edited by Dwight Van Driver on 04/10/2011 at 16:20
|