Are there any cars that currently on the market that don't suffer engine damage from a snapped timing belt. I was always under the impression that at Hondas were designed like this?
|
Such engines are termed 'non-interference' engines. The concept is that at no time do pistons or valves occupy space which at another time is occupied by the other.
I don't have a list of current engines designed along these principles, but I believe they are mainly found in Japanese cars and that they are not especially common.
|
MX5
|
Do you mean that the MX5 engine will be damaged if the belt breaks, or it won't?
It would be nice to know for definate as son and heir has a 1998 1,6. Lovely little car.
|
|
The question was if there were any cars that didn't suffer engine damage. I said MX5 because it doesn't.
|
|
|
Such engines are termed 'non-interference' engines. The concept is that at no time do pistons or valves occupy space which at another time is occupied by the other. I don't have a list of current engines designed along these principles, but I believe they are mainly found in Japanese cars and that they are not especially common.
If this is techically possible, why on earth are engines designed any other way? Seems absolutely ludicrous to me.
|
to get higher compression ratios and more power.
|
Better policy is to avoid it all by aiming for cars with a timing chain. Seems like madness to risk all to a rubber belt, along with connected problems of water pump failure etc.
Belts are a cheap solution and in theory fine if replaced regularly but there is always the element of risk and expense.
It's been discussed previously, I think most Nissans have chains instead of belts. More of the modern Fords and Vauxhalls also.
|
|
|
|