What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Parted with money - SLO76
With much reluctance I have finally parted with my hard earned and purchased another car. Swmbo was angling for a new model Volvo XC60 at £25k upwards but after a bit of effort I managed to find a cheaper option that satisfied her need to lord it over others on the road. I bought an approved used 2015 Volvo XC60 D5 auto with all the toys, 44,000 miles, a full Volvo history and in spotless condition inside and out. After negotiation the price wasn’t too bad compared to others nearby at £14,700 but this one had a years Volvo warranty included. With a private plate you wouldn’t know what age it is thanks to the condition too.

Fingers crossed it’s as reliable as our cars typically are but with the one owner from new having traded it in for another one with the local dealer who’d serviced it for the last few years I’d say he’s been happy with it. Yes I could’ve held out for a cheaper one privately, to be honest that’s what I was doing but this one is optimal, it’s right in every way if not exactly cheap and pickings are slim on the private sale front these days with only a very overpriced 17 plate V40 sparking any real interest but it was at retail money and needed to come down by £1500.

Edited by SLO76 on 23/09/2020 at 20:18

Parted with money - DavidGlos
Nice one SLO. Is that the latest shape one, or the previous shape?

Have you still got the Avensis and the Polo? Which one goes on account of the new arrival?

Edited by DavidGlos on 23/09/2020 at 20:55

Parted with money - SLO76
Previous shape, the new ones are all £25k upwards. The Polo is going as the Avensis is just too useful to part with. It was a good wee car but it’s starting to rust on the n/s sill and it’s more likely to go wrong than the big Toyota. With full VW and specialist history and sensible miles It’ll make someone a good car though after a dealer hits it with a bit of paint. I part exchanged it rather than prepped and sold it myself as the dealer offered decent money for it, in fact more than I was offered on a CRV almost a year ago. At best I’d’ve made maybe £400-£500 more but it would’ve meant dealing with the usual idiots and the last thing I want right now is such like turning up at my door.

Edited by SLO76 on 23/09/2020 at 21:09

Parted with money - Big John

D5 - best engine choice

Parted with money - craig-pd130

D5 - best engine choice

The 5-potters are still lovely to drive. I had two V60s back to back, the first was the D3 163bhp 2.0 5-cylinder, and the second was the D4 with the VEA twin-turbo modular 4-cylinder.

The D4 had more power on paper (181bhp vs 163) and supposedly a little more torque, but on the road the D3 was definitely the sweeter motor: smoother and with a nice cultured growl. It felt just as punchy in terms of in-gear go.

While Volvo obviously wanted to rationalise costs with the VEA modular engine, they lost a lot of character by moving from the 5-cylinder motors.

Parted with money - Zippy123
Nice, hope you enjoy it!

I looked at a new one earlier in the year when offered a silly lease deal but realised would never get the thing in to some of the 1960s car parks round here.
Parted with money - nellyjak

Nice one SLO...sounds a good car...and not a bad deal at all.

I'm sure it will give you good service ....and you still have the Avensis.!!

Parted with money - Moodyman

Good result. I'm really liking the recent Volvo lineup and along with Lexus, they would be one of two manufacturers I'd consider if I was looking for premium transport.

However, I have reservations about the Chinese connection. Not politics related, but the quality. How removed are Volvo from their parent Geely too be deemed a 'proper' Volvo?

Edited by Moodyman on 24/09/2020 at 09:14

Parted with money - mcb100

I honestly see no need to worry about Geely's involvement with Volvo. They've proved so far to be remarkably hands off (apart, obviously, from the financial injection). If anything, it has given Geely's own branded products a boost.

Parted with money - SLO76
“ However, I have reservations about the Chinese connection. Not politics related, but the quality. How removed are Volvo from their parent Geely too be deemed a 'proper' Volvo?”

I too was concerned about the Chinese takeover but it seems they simply handed Volvo a fat wad of cash and told them to crack on. They’re really on form of late regards styling and quality inside and out in my opinion. They’re certainly not following the American policy of cutting their way to profit that led to the death of Saab.
Parted with money - Engineer Andy

Wow! Spending 10x as much as you normally do. I bet that hurt. :-)

Parted with money - _

Wow! Spending 10x as much as you normally do. I bet that hurt. :-)

" Ditto",

But all the same SLO knows enough about the trade to make a good choice.

Parted with money - SLO76
“ But all the same SLO knows enough about the trade to make a good choice.”

Fingers crossed but I wouldn’t have bought this had it been down to me to be honest, I’d stick with my usual recommend 5yr plus Japanese petrol powered hatch or Estate. It was the best option to keep the boss happy at reasonable money.
Parted with money - RJ414i
“ But all the same SLO knows enough about the trade to make a good choice.” Fingers crossed but I wouldn’t have bought this had it been down to me to be honest, I’d stick with my usual recommend 5yr plus Japanese petrol powered hatch or Estate. It was the best option to keep the boss happy at reasonable money.

Would a Part Ex of the third option not have been a cheaper long term option?

Parted with money - SLO76
“ But all the same SLO knows enough about the trade to make a good choice.” Fingers crossed but I wouldn’t have bought this had it been down to me to be honest, I’d stick with my usual recommend 5yr plus Japanese petrol powered hatch or Estate. It was the best option to keep the boss happy at reasonable money.

Would a Part Ex of the third option not have been a cheaper long term option?

Very much so
Parted with money - SLO76

Wow! Spending 10x as much as you normally do. I bet that hurt. :-)

You’re not kidding!
Parted with money - Engineer Andy

Wow! Spending 10x as much as you normally do. I bet that hurt. :-)

You’re not kidding!

The old balance between a happy wife and a decent bank balance! Gone are the days when the colour of the car was enough. :-)

Parted with money - Avant

Best of luck with it SLO. That sound like just the right mileage for a 5-y-o car, and it's always a good sign if the owner has PXed it for another of the same make.

Let's hope Mrs SLO does enough miles to avoid DPF problems - but if she wanted a Volvo there was little alternative to diesel. Until quite recently Volvo were encouraging buyers to go diesel, to the extent that you couldn't get a test drive in a petrol. The D4 engine I had in my V60 was noisy and stodgy; but if your D5 is a 5-cylinder, it makes a much nicer noise and I'd imagine makes it a better car to drive.

Parted with money - John F

Looks good to me, SLO - lots of car for the money. And I always liked the 5 cylinder engines in our previous cars (Passat GL5, Audi 100) - I'm sure you will too. I'd be interested to know your eventual long term mpg.

Parted with money - SLO76

Looks good to me, SLO - lots of car for the money. And I always liked the 5 cylinder engines in our previous cars (Passat GL5, Audi 100) - I'm sure you will too. I'd be interested to know your eventual long term mpg.

Always been a fan of odd numbered cylinder motors too, from 3cyl Daihatsu and VW diesels to 20v 5cyl Audi turbo and Volvo T5’s I’ve always liked that offbeat engine note. I imagine it’ll be fairly juicy though as a large AWD SUV auto with 215bhp. If it gets close to 40mpg on a run I’ll be impressed.

Edited by SLO76 on 24/09/2020 at 14:01

Parted with money - SLO76
“ Best of luck with it SLO.“

Thanks Avant. She’ll get a regular run often enough to keep the DPF happy hopefully. I’ve always liked a car with an odd number of cylinders, I just like that offbeat sound. The Polo had 3 and sounded quite characterful for a wee diesel. I’ll give honest reviews of how it gets on, hopefully it proves as robust as it looks.

Edited by SLO76 on 24/09/2020 at 18:57

Parted with money - drd63

Strange choice given your normal advice SLO. I’m assuming the XC60 fares better than the XC90 2015 onWard model which was found to be the UK’s leas reliable car in a recent Which survey and Volvo generally sit well in the bottom half of brand reliability. Agree with you about odd number of cylinders though, triples especially sound great.

Parted with money - SLO76

Strange choice given your normal advice SLO. I’m assuming the XC60 fares better than the XC90 2015 onWard model which was found to be the UK’s leas reliable car in a recent Which survey and Volvo generally sit well in the bottom half of brand reliability. Agree with you about odd number of cylinders though, triples especially sound great.

Yes, another reason (aside from Scots misery) that I wanted an older D5. The later 4cyl Volvo diesels have been proving quite troublesome with regards to EGR and DPF related woe. I also wanted to avoid the Powershift gearbox that certain Volvo’s use too. The previous gen D5’s are regarded as robust but gearbox problems aren’t unheard of as they age so fingers crossed. I opted for the auto despite this as it really suits the nature of the car. Had I bought a newer model I would probably have tried to go petrol.

Edited by SLO76 on 25/09/2020 at 14:15

Parted with money - SLO76
Well that’s (Venus) the Volvo sat on the drive. Initial impressions are very favourable. Condition is excellent, drives without fault, no rattles or squeaks and buying experience was largely pleasant, though I was disappointed that it hadn’t as promised been through the valet shop again before delivery, there were a few bird droppings and a there was a wee later of dust.

First drive as a passenger was pleasant. The seats are excellent and the interior quality is high. The only mild disappointment is the ride quality which is slightly on the choppy side at low speeds, worse I’d say than the CRV we had before and the decade old Avensis I have also but then it’s pretty normal for an SUV, the big Honda was very soft for its type.

On the return trip as driver however I was more impressed. The slightly firm ride at low speeds is offset by excellent high speed stability, loads of grip and little roll on corners for an SUV. The 215bhp D5 motor shoves it down the road at a fair lick when required and the slightly grumbly engine note this engine is often criticised for is to me quite pleasant with that old school diesel note softened slightly by the 5cyl warble. I like it.

It feels like it’ll outlast the next ice age but only time will tell. It’s certainly spacious, comfortable, safe, well made, lusty and has class without the image issues of rival German brands. I’ve always liked Volvo’s, I grew up being flung around the back seats of 340’s and 240’s in the 80’s. They always feel a bit dated to drive but also they feel like home.
Parted with money - misar

Did you study the HJ review Good/Bad page and the owner reviews before making the purchase?

Parted with money - SLO76

Did you study the HJ review Good/Bad page and the owner reviews before making the purchase?

Sure did, they’re always very helpful and thus the reason why I initially wanted to go for a Honda CRV 1.6 Twin turbo EX or a Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv but neither particularly appealed to swmbo and I also found the Mazda hard to locate in petrol form and every Honda we looked at had been neglected by owners who treated them like appliances, even the approved used examples at our nearby main dealer. The XC60 is far from vice free but the best of them seems to be the older D5’s with much of the complaints being made against the newer 4cyl diesels but they do need full dealer history and you need to verify all updates and recalls have been carried out. It’s more of a risk than a simple petrol engined hatch or estate but when buying a large(ish) SUV there will always be some risk involved. I’ve removed as much of it as possible with this sort of vehicle for the money I was willing to spend and I know a few people who own them and one with an elderly 2005 XC90 2.4d auto and none report anything other than praise though the XC90 owner does moan about the lack of power and fuel consumption but then I did tell him not to buy a large SUV on a baked bean budget. Time will tell but it’s covered by a Volvo warranty for the next year which gives me a good opportunity to gauge how reliable it’s going to be and I’ve bought it well enough that it wouldn’t be a disaster if I have to move it on. Hopefully this won’t happen though as the gaffer rather likes it and would only demand a newer one on a horrid never-ending PCP or lease. Plus me buying (or rather renting) a new car wouldn’t make for very interesting reviews would it? I like hunting for and buying good used cars on a budget and this is a car that would’ve had a list price in excess of £35k just over 5 1/2 years ago that I bought for less than £15,000. Aside from one minor stone chip it looks like new inside and out. It’ll be interesting to see how ownership of a premium diesel SUV pans out.
Parted with money - pd

If it has been main dealer serviced then it will have had any software updates automatically although to be honest by 2015 the XC60 was a very well sorted car with few generic issues.

Any Volvo serviced at a main dealer gets 12 months breakdown cover as well included (called "SARA" regardless of any used warranty provision.

Parted with money - SLO76
Well, I’ve not had much opportunity to drive it so far which is in itself not a bad thing as it suggests that swmbo is very happy with Venus the Volvo. The fleeting drives I’ve had to date have revealed hugely comfortable seats, excellent interior quality, surprising capability on corners and very lusty performance but the biggest negative is very choppy ride at low speeds. I’m still very pleased with it though and I rate it well ahead of the CRV we had previously. With new and used car prices continuing Northwards I’ll be trying to keep the gaffer parked on this drivers seat for many a year to come hopefully.
Parted with money - KBB

Hi SLO, you commented earlier on issues with the more recent engines:

"The later 4cyl Volvo diesels have been proving quite troublesome with regards to EGR and DPF related woe."

and I wondered if you could elaborate on that.

I've recently bought a 2018 V60 D4 (2.0L 4cyl) and before buying I did a bit of looking around forums etc to see if there were significant issues. I found some threads on the Volvo forum about rising oil levels due to dilution with diesel from failed regens, but not enough that it looked like it was a widespread issue.

I am currently WFH every day and thus, a higher proportion of journeys are short. I realise this is not great for the DPF, but from what I had read, the Volvo implementation doesn't have too many problems. I'd like to be forewarned and forearmed, esp if there is something I can do to prevent. Thanks.

Parted with money - SLO76
Best thing to do is to read the review sections on Volvo’s equipped with this engine, you’ll find mention to it. Owner reviews often mention engine related issues too but I suspect later cars will be sorted by now. Volvo generally has a good reputation. But as with anything I tend to avoid the first of any new generation engine until it has proven itself, almost all designs go through a teething problem or two. The old D5 is well known but not entirely vice free either.
Parted with money - KBB

Problem is the D4 has been used as an engine identifier for years across multiple models, so it's impossible to tell from a review if it's actually the same engine.

What I do know is that the EGR problems are from an engine version that did not use Adblue. The engine I have definitely DOES use Adblue so hopefully should not suffer that issue.

I suppose I will just keep an eye on it and cross fingers. Unfortunately, there is no dipstick to measure the oil level. The electronic dipstick currently shows the oil is full, so theoretically if it starts getting diesel added to it I should get a warning fairly quickly.

Parted with money - Avant

You should be fine, KBB. The issues with the D4 were on pre-2016 models.

Parted with money - KBB

OK, thanks.

Parted with money - SLO76
Update on approved used Volvo ownership.

First fault, water ingress due to badly fitted rear fog lamp on what turns out to be replacement rear bumper (the lamp holder is ruined) not covered under so-called all singing, all dancing Volvo warranty. It’s a bad design too being so low in the bumper it gets all the spray from the rear wheels directly into the wiring and lamp connector. I’ll send it to the trusted local auto electrician I’ve used for years. Mildly miffed as fault was likely there from purchase as this was the first time we used the fog lights. I expected some goodwill.

Called the service dept a month after buying to ask when the timing belt interval was (I know it’s 10yrs or 108k) to which they answered 6yrs regardless of mileage. But when I informed them I’d just bought it this figure quickly reverted to the 10yr Volvo recommendation. Seems 10yrs is ok for them but not for the rest of us. Blatant attempt at dishonesty plus lack of any good will for above means my local independent will be servicing the car rather than the main dealer. They have a poor reputation locally but the car itself is a nice example.

Edited by SLO76 on 01/02/2021 at 11:44

Parted with money - nellyjak
Update on approved used Volvo ownership. First fault, water ingress due to badly fitted rear fog lamp on what turns out to be replacement rear bumper (the lamp holder is ruined) not covered under so-called all singing, all dancing Volvo warranty. It’s a bad design too being so low in the bumper it gets all the spray from the rear wheels directly into the wiring and lamp connector. I’ll send it to the trusted local auto electrician I’ve used for years. Mildly miffed as fault was likely there from purchase as this was the first time we used the fog lights. I expected some goodwill. Called the service dept a month after buying to ask when the timing belt interval was (I know it’s 10yrs or 108k) to which they answered 6yrs regardless of mileage. But when I informed them I’d just bought it this figure quickly reverted to the 10yr Volvo recommendation. Seems 10yrs is ok for them but not for the rest of us. Blatant attempt at dishonesty plus lack of any good will for above means my local independent will be servicing the car rather than the main dealer. They have a poor reputation locally but the car itself is a nice example.

I'd find that quite disappointing SLO......the lack of goodwill particularly.

I did use my local Volvo main dealer when I had my V70 and they were good so I guess I got lucky.

Glad you are enjoying the car though.

Parted with money - SLO76
“ Glad you are enjoying the car though”

To be honest, I prefer the old Toyota. It rides better, it’s better on fuel, it has more space inside and it’s better made. I’ll wager it’s still going long after the Volvo is in the bin. I’ve far more confidence in it but swmbo wanted a big posh SUV.
Parted with money - badbusdriver
“ Glad you are enjoying the car though” To be honest, I prefer the old Toyota. It rides better, it’s better on fuel, it has more space inside and it’s better made. I’ll wager it’s still going long after the Volvo is in the bin. I’ve far more confidence in it but swmbo wanted a big posh SUV.

Maybe a Japanese or Korean SUV would be a possibility?. Not posh in the traditional sense (apart from Lexus), but the leather upholstery and gizmo's might make it an adequate substitute. And the Mazda CX5 is a handsome machine, for an SUV.

Parted with money - Alby Back
You can't resist the tide SLO. My wife's Qashqai is the most uninteresting thing to drive. Can't fault it as a car really, but it's slow, handles ponderously, isn't fab on fuel, has too hard suspension and it feels like you're sitting on a bar stool when you are driving it.

A Focus, Astra, Golf or anything similar would a far nicer thing to drive, with similar practicality, but, she loves her sitty uppy car.

I really don't get it, she doesn't have a bad back or anything, so the ease of entry etc is irrelevant.

It's just her preference, and when asked, she can't tell me why. But, I'm old and tired and broken enough to know better than to argue...

;-)
Parted with money - Avant

Bearing in mind the title of the thread, I don't think that Mrs SLO will be getting another new car any time soon!

Time was whern both Toyotas and Volvos had well-deserved reputations for reliabilty and longevity: remember those tank-like 240 and 740 estates? Toyota's reputation is still intact; but as Volvos have become better to drive, they seem to have become less sturdy, perhaps lined with the increased reliance on electronics. Toyotas are full of electronics too, but the Japanese seem to have the ability to test them fully before putting them into production.

Still, even that is better than selling cars while the software is still in development. That could well do VW more harm than 'Dieselgate', which didn't have the effect on sales that some people expected it to.

Parted with money - Alby Back
I learned to drive in 1975 in my dad's 240. Last time I checked ( about 5 years ago ) it was still on the road. Must see if it still is.
Parted with money - SLO76
“ Maybe a Japanese or Korean SUV would be a possibility?. Not posh in the traditional sense (apart from Lexus), but the leather upholstery and gizmo's might make it an adequate substitute. And the Mazda CX5 is a handsome machine, for an SUV.”


I wanted a petrol post facelift CX5 but the gaffer wasn’t keen. The big Volvo is a fine big car (stupid positioning of rear fog lamps aside) it’s just a bit lumpy riding which is normal for an SUV. I prefer a big estate.


It’s the dishonesty of the local Volvo dealer that’s the issue. Sadly this particular firm runs the Honda, Mazda, Suzuki and Mitsubishi dealerships nearby. Customer service is sadly lacking at nice you’ve left the showroom.

Edited by SLO76 on 01/02/2021 at 15:45

Parted with money - Alby Back
It does though fascinate me, both personally and professionally ( I've been around the premium "branded" fashion business all my life ) as to what people think they are buying into when it comes to car choice, as opposed to what they are actually getting.

Once you get beyond the primary function of efficiently transporting people and their belongings from point A to point B, which can be achieved with the most basic and inexpensive of vehicles of varying sizes, it all starts to get a bit more subjective.

You could draw all manner of Venn diagrams on the subject but with the two main loops being solutions versus statements.



Parted with money - SLO76
“ Customer service is sadly lacking at nice you’ve left the showroom.”

Customer service is sadly lacking once you’ve left the showroom.


Damn predictive text.
Parted with money - Heidfirst
It’s the dishonesty of the local Volvo dealer that’s the issue. Sadly this particular firm runs the Honda, Mazda, Suzuki and Mitsubishi dealerships nearby. Customer service is sadly lacking at nice you’ve left the showroom.

That'll be a group beginning with P then ... I thought that they had a reasonable reputation but maybe I am wrong. Mind you my sister has had issues over the years with at least 3 Volvo dealers in the Glasgow area so maybe it's the franchise rather than the dealer? Have you personal experience of all of those local P's Group franchises?

My own experience with 3 different franchises within the AC empire suggests that franchise does make a difference.

Parted with money - SLO76
It’s the dishonesty of the local Volvo dealer that’s the issue. Sadly this particular firm runs the Honda, Mazda, Suzuki and Mitsubishi dealerships nearby. Customer service is sadly lacking at nice you’ve left the showroom.

That'll be a group beginning with P then ... I thought that they had a reasonable reputation but maybe I am wrong. Mind you my sister has had issues over the years with at least 3 Volvo dealers in the Glasgow area so maybe it's the franchise rather than the dealer? Have you personal experience of all of those local P's Group franchises?

My own experience with 3 different franchises within the AC empire suggests that franchise does make a difference.

I have bad blood with the Honda franchise and was horrified by the standard of their so-called approved used stock when we went to view CRV’s. My previous example was serviced there and often the work was substandard. They couldn’t even wash the thing properly which they are supposed to do when in for a service. They just moved the dirt around. The difference between them and our local VW dealer is huge but neither of us fancied a Tiguan. My little Polo always came back with any work done properly and it was always spotless.

Edited by SLO76 on 01/02/2021 at 18:33

Parted with money - nellyjak
“ Glad you are enjoying the car though” To be honest, I prefer the old Toyota. It rides better, it’s better on fuel, it has more space inside and it’s better made. I’ll wager it’s still going long after the Volvo is in the bin. I’ve far more confidence in it but swmbo wanted a big posh SUV.

Well, It's no secret that I'm an out and out Toyota fan and have been for years...tbh I buy nothing else..but at least that's based on experience over the many I've had.

I've never had to question reliability and build quality in any of them.

Parted with money - skidpan

Called the service dept a month after buying to ask when the timing belt interval was (I know it’s 10yrs or 108k) to which they answered 6yrs regardless of mileage. But when I informed them I’d just bought it this figure quickly reverted to the 10yr Volvo recommendation

When we bought the 1.4 TSi Leon back in 2013 I asked about cam belt changes and cost since I do not like to get surprises later. Was told it was 3 years or 36,000 miles and the cost was about £350 inc water pump.

Not too unhappy but after a couple of weeks it seemed that with such a short interval they would get very few fleet sales, 36,000 would be about 18 months on our works cars. So I rang another local Seat dealer to be told 5 years or 60,000 miles, better but nowhere near Fords figures.

With 2 very different figures I contacted Seat themselves who confirmed it was after 60,000 miles inspect the belt and if it OK inspect every 20,000 miles after that. Regardless of condition the belt must be changed after 6 years or 120,000 miles.

Personally very happy since it mean't I would not have to change a belt since I would get nowhere near 120,000 miles and would be unlikely to keep it longer than 5 years (we actually had it for just under 4 years.

I could not hep but feel that the dealer we bought from was simply profiteering and since he proved himself to be a liar shortly after we had bought it that feeling was 100% correct.

Well, It's no secret that I'm an out and out Toyota fan and have been for years...tbh I buy nothing else..but at least that's based on experience over the many I've had.

I've never had to question reliability and build quality in any of them.

We have not had reliability issues with any of the car we have had since the mid 80's (when we bought the first Golf) and although I find VAG products perfect for our current needs that does not mean we never look elsewhere. I will always make the final choice on more factors than being happy with a brand in the past. Been very happy with the 4 Nissans we have had but when they don't make a suitable car for us we don't go and even look.

Parted with money - SLO76
“ Well, It's no secret that I'm an out and out Toyota fan and have been for years...tbh I buy nothing else..but at least that's based on experience over the many I've had.

I've never had to question reliability and build quality in any of them”

Yeah, they rarely go wrong. I’ve never had any major trouble in all the years I spent flogging them and owning them.
Parted with money - SLO76
Forgot to mention that the dealer did (with a bit of arm twisting) fix the problem free of charge. Car has been otherwise faultless but I find I’m not really that keen on it. The 5cyl engine is probably the best part of it, bags of pull and a fair bit of character but the ride quality really isn’t good enough. All irrelevant though as swmbo absolutely loves it.

The choice of who to service it is approaching however and with trust in the main dealer absolutely gone after the timing belt lie I’m left with trusted independent who services “Terrance” the Toyota (wife names everything) and offers “dealer level servicing using genuine manufacturer parts” or do I take a day off work to visit the well regarded Volvo specialist in Glasgow?

Edited by SLO76 on 16/05/2021 at 21:02

Parted with money - Metropolis.

Go for the independent or you'll be a slave to the car. I'm sure the service schedule is readily available in the paperwork or failing that online, and so you can ask that specific things are done ontop of whatever is found to be needing doing. Main dealers, specialists, independents, they can all be toe rags (in my experience a dodgy specialist with lovely family run branding and credentials!). My only stipulation with the indie is that they must use OEM parts (as in the original brands such as Denso) rather than pattern. Usually i supply my own if i am asking for a specific job to be done.

Could the ride quality be improved with higher profile tyres?

Parted with money - Falkirk Bairn

I used to get my Honda serviced by a P ..... franchised dealer - they have loads of franchises.

The last time was when the car was 5 years old. I booked the car in then decided I wanted a wheels off look at my brakes and pads out, handbrake adjusted, greased etc. The car service was £200+IIRC and they wanted £295 for a brake service. I had the service done and got my local Indie to do the brakes - 1 hour labour was the whole charge.

Months later I was checking levels and decided to look at the auto gearbox levels - the dip stick was like a coiled spring. I phoned and they said it was not them - they would say that!

Never paid them another penny - my local Indie stamp in in the service book

Current Honda 5 stamps, Indie 3 in a few months 4 - I will not be back.

26 years ago I bought first Honda at Dunblane Honda (locally owned) then 2001 Helensburgh Honda (locally owned) - used them for servicing etc - Great service.

At around 2005 Honda started shutting local "smaller outlets" - Honda in Scotland is now chains - A Clark, Parks, Vertu, Eastern Western ................ the only small Honda dealers are in rural communities Dumfries, Aberdeenshire, Peebles in the Borders - all too far tor me to use.

Parted with money - barney100

Sounds a good deal on an excellent car. Mate has one and loves it.

Parted with money - SLO76
First long run in “Venus” the Volvo, down to Southampton for a short Disney cruise. Car performed well, knobbly ride smooths out very well on the motorway and the twin turbo 5cyl motor pulls great. Averaged 38mpg, which is ok for a flying barn door. Seats are thankfully great, swmbo and mother in law fell asleep quickly.

Edited by SLO76 on 05/08/2021 at 17:22

Parted with money - badbusdriver

Seats are thankfully great, swmbo and mother in law fell asleep quickly.

Bonus!

;-)

Parted with money - SLO76
Ruddy Nora! Low mileage Volvo snapped a front coil spring in sensational fashion this morning, cost to replace with Volvo spring from main dealer £300!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A wee reminder for folks looking at used prestige motors that parts and servicing prices are in line with that new list price. Appalling overcharging for a small piece of bent metal and one that didn’t even last 7yrs and 50,000 miles. I’ve bought cars for that before. If only swmbo would lower her nose and be happy with a nice used Civic or similar.
Parted with money - Chris M

Question is, why would you go to Volvo for the repair? Sachs item from ECP (other retailers are available) is £55 (inc VAT). Obviously you will replace both, so £110. You MUST know a man that can. Assuming it's a straightforward strut out job, be done in time for elevensies.

Edited by Chris M on 16/08/2021 at 17:35

Parted with money - Rerepo

Question is, why would you go to Volvo for the repair? Sachs item from ECP (other retailers are available) is £55 (inc VAT). Obviously you will replace both, so £110. You MUST know a man that can. Assuming it's a straightforward strut out job, be done in time for elevensies.

Front spring failure is a well known XC60 weak spot. Usually its just the end coil that snaps off. Should do both sides - remove strut, compress spring and replace. Strut top bearings are another weak spot so replace those at the same time. Adds nothing to the labour time andthey cost around £30 each.

Parted with money - badbusdriver

A few years ago on Top Gear, they did a test, pretty extreme at times, of 3 medium sized SUV's, one of which was a Volvo (presumably an XC60). During one of the more extreme punishments, which involved a (small) jump, the Volvo broke its suspension. Now obviously this is way beyond the treatment a car would expect under normal circumstances, but I do remember the other two contenders managed with no breakages other than bits of plastic trim.

Maybe new Volvo's, or relatively recent ones anyway, are not as hardy as Volvo's traditionally were?.

Parted with money - Trilogy.

Perhaps the parts are now Made in China, I hasten to add, not 'of' china!

Parted with money - SLO76
Unfortunately I need the car back quickly and my usual independent is booked solid for the next two weeks so main dealer will be doing it along with the timing belt and ancillary belt plus service it’s booked in for but at a discounted rate, they almost matched the specialist quote I mentioned to them. Unfortunate timing but both cars are needed this week as the boss is back to work tomorrow.
Parted with money - SLO76

Perhaps the parts are now Made in China, I hasten to add, not 'of' china!

Similar quality it would seem. On inspection it’s not even that crusty. I hit a speed bump at a fair speed, not exactly excessive and within the speed limit but that when it shattered. It’s an off-roader which must be driven rather gingerly over obstacles it would seem.
Parted with money - Rerepo

Perhaps the parts are now Made in China, I hasten to add, not 'of' china!

Similar quality it would seem. On inspection it’s not even that crusty. I hit a speed bump at a fair speed, not exactly excessive and within the speed limit but that when it shattered. It’s an off-roader which must be driven rather gingerly over obstacles it would seem.

Its a rather mild off-roader. It uses Volvo's 'P3 Chassis', which is actually another name for the Ford EUCD chassis (as used on the Mondeo, Galaxy, S-Max).

Parted with money - Chris M

"On inspection it’s not even that crusty."

I've replaced broken springs where, with a quick wipe over, could pass as new and I've had cars with very corroded springs which have lasted for years and not snapped.

Parted with money - Steveieb

HJ always guided us towards the Japanese/Korean method of chamfering the coil springs so that the pressure is evenly spread.

European manufacturers just fit normal springs which rely on pressure on a small area

Parted with money - SLO76

HJ always guided us towards the Japanese/Korean method of chamfering the coil springs so that the pressure is evenly spread.

European manufacturers just fit normal springs which rely on pressure on a small area

In all the years I’ve bought, sold and personally owned cars I’ve only replaced one coil spring on a Japanese car. European cars are murder for springs failing.
Parted with money - Andrew-T

<< In all the years I’ve ... personally owned cars I’ve only replaced one coil spring on a Japanese car. European cars are murder for springs failing. >>

I've never owned a car where a spring has broken - helical, leaf or hydrolastic. And only one of them was Japanese. Must be the way I drive ... :-)

Parted with money - SLO76
Well on a positive note, the warranty has surprisingly covered the top mount and track rod end that went pop along with the spring which they’ve also covered. Suspect swmbo may be rattling over those speed bumps on her way to work at a fair old lick.
Parted with money - Archie35

If I may ask SLO76, how are you getting on with this XC60 now that you've had it for a year? I'm looking at a similar car, also for my wife [mostly], in our case a "2015 Volvo XC60 D5 auto with all the toys, 30,000 miles, a full Volvo history and in spotless condition inside and out". It's somewhat more than you paid, but all the cars I've been looking at over the past 6 months are now asking more ££. Also from a Volvo dealer, with a year's warrenty. I'm just a bit nervous that I might be buying into a potential money pit. For the mileage we do, and the type of roads we use (mostly country roads, & a mix of tiny lanes up to dual carriageways) a diesel makes more sense - but I'm aware that older diesels can get expensive. Are you still happy with yours?

Parted with money - SLO76
Apologies for not answering.

I have to say that I don’t like the car at all. It’s a smart looking thing, it has great seats and the 2.4 5cyl twin turbo diesel would pull a house down. It’s not terrible on fuel either, averaging around 38mpg and for an SUV it’s pretty nimble on the twists, with plenty of grip though the steering is numb and the 6speed auto box is a bit dimwitted.

Now for the negatives, which is pretty much everything else. The ride is awful, it never really settles at all, the quality isn’t good at all. Interior plastics are generally ok but some bits would look bad in a Dacia Sandero. There’s more rust underneath and on the front crossmember than there is on my 11yr old near 100,000 mile Toyota Avensis. The air conditioning compressor is noisy (perfectly normal according to the dealer), the rear fog lamps are i****ically in the rear bumper and have no protection from the muck and water thrown up by the rear wheels meaning they regularly need replaced (not just the bulbs) and the suspension is made from chicken wire. Ours shattered a front spring and required a new top mount and a drop link after running over a moderate speed hump at low speed. Luckily it was covered by Volvo Selekt’s warranty otherwise it was a costly repair that shouldn’t be needed on a low mileage SUV.

It is now loosing coolant, the source of which I and my local garage have been to date unable to find, I’m currently carrying a bottle of coolant and a bottle of water around in the boot which is poor going for a £15,000 car. It now needs a front wheel bearing at 55,000 miles which shows you how poor the quality is. I’ve never replaced a bearing so early, even on cheap budget cars. I have no faith in the car and the parts are cripplingly expensive. It doesn’t drive well, it has less space inside than my old Avensis estate, it’s really no bigger than a hatchback. The old Toyota rides much better and is much smoother and with the much more costly Volvo there’s loads more that can and seemingly is going to go wrong.

Volvo’s used to be great cars. Well made, long lived and easy enough to fix when they did eventually go wrong. Today the Chinese ownership of the firm and past interference of the American bean counters at Ford have left a legacy of reduced quality. In my (admittedly limited with recent Volvo’s) experience they’re poorly built Chinese junk. I wish I’d held out for another Honda CRV. I won’t buy another.

Edited by SLO76 on 01/01/2022 at 20:15

Parted with money - Metropolis.
Blimey, offload quick while prices are high!
Parted with money - SLO76
Blimey, offload quick while prices are high!

Exactly what I want to do but swmbo loves it. It’s getting one more chance, I’ll book it in with the nearby Volvo specialist to see what he thinks. But this will be the last non-wear and tear money I’m willing to spend on it.

Edited by SLO76 on 01/01/2022 at 21:30

Parted with money - Brit_in_Germany

Could the coolant loss be related to the EGR, a known Volvo weakness?

Parted with money - SLO76

Could the coolant loss be related to the EGR, a known Volvo weakness?

As far as I’m aware that relates to the newer D4’s, an engine I chose to avoid due to a number of early issues. Figured the old D5 would be well sorted by its last year but I will give the Volvo specialist a call and ask his opinion.

Edited by SLO76 on 01/01/2022 at 23:05

Parted with money - FiestaOwner

Sorry to hear about your experiences SLO. Not what you expect from a low mileage, Approved Used, Volvo.

Just shows that there is no such thing as a safe bet when car buying! When you can get it wrong, the rest of us have no chance! I've certainly got it badly wrong on 2 occasions myself.

Parted with money - Andrew-T

Just shows that there is no such thing as a safe bet when car buying! When you can get it wrong, the rest of us have no chance! I've certainly got it badly wrong on 2 occasions myself.

I'm not sure there ever has been a 'safe bet', unless you are willing to spend on a car which has had everything fully vetted before leaving the factory. Even a 20th-century car is a fairly complex machine made of parts from various makers. 100% certainties are rare - most of us expect about 95%. I think I may have been luckier than that :-)

Parted with money - badbusdriver

Sorry to hear about your experiences SLO. Not what you expect from a low mileage, Approved Used, Volvo.

Just shows that there is no such thing as a safe bet when car buying! When you can get it wrong, the rest of us have no chance! I've certainly got it badly wrong on 2 occasions myself.

To be fair, I don't think SLO himself would ever have chosen that car! ;-)

Parted with money - SLO76
Only the second time I’d say I’ve really been caught by a lemon and both were low mileage full dealer history approved used cars. This suffer of a Volvo and a 2yr old BMW 318 Ci. I’m not counting the pig pig of an MG Metro I bought for my first car as I was young and even more stupid plus I didn’t pay for it.
Parted with money - Metropolis.
Let’s hope it is not head gasket going then! Did they do a coolant exhaust gas check?
Parted with money - SLO76
Let’s hope it is not head gasket going then! Did they do a coolant exhaust gas check?

No signs of oil and water mixing and they’re not prone to HGF these so I’d doubt it. That said, nothings impossible to this car.

Edited by SLO76 on 02/01/2022 at 23:54

Parted with money - SLO76
Well that’s the troublesome Volvo away. I sold it to a local dealer group via their equivalent of WBAC for £14350, only £350 less than I paid for it as a main dealer approved used car a year and a half ago. Fortunately the glorious wet weather hid the rust patches on the roof and an enormous stone chip on the windscreen and the buyer didn’t drive it at more than 30mph so the droning front wheel bearing wasn’t noticed either. The low coolant warning stayed off too which was nice. I’m delighted to be shot of this utter liability and no other post Ford or Chinese Volvo product will ever darken my driveway again. Quality is poor and parts prices insane. Anyone can be caught out and even sticking to a very well maintained full main dealer history car is no guarantee of longterm reliability. SWMBO is now running around in that 59 plate Nissan Note I was selling while we await a decision on another vehicle. I’m hoping the pleasure of having no monthly payment and a noticeable fuel saving will appeal enough to deter the planned electric car.

Edited by SLO76 on 09/01/2022 at 18:36

Parted with money - Xileno

Sounds like you got out in time and did well on the valuation. Let's hope the replacement is more satisfactory for you.