It seems the Hyundai/Kia commitment to quality (A journey they started about 20 years ago) is continuing to pay off. The rest are about where you'd expect them, but I was suprised to see Vauxhall pip Honda into the top 10.
www.am-online.com/news/manufacturer/2018/07/11/hyu...y
Meaningless. I couldn't find any description of the methodology. A given make could do well even though one or two models are dogs. Without a model breakdown, it's useless. And what about the statistical reliability? No mention of the expected spread of the data. None. Zilch.
How do they rate the faults? Some such as the CarPlay rebooting are minor, others such as wipers breaking are serious and can cause a crash.
What about mileage? If the Honda Jazz is always bought by people over 70 who drive 5,000 miles a year, can you really compare that to a BMW 3 series that is bought by sales people who drive 40,000 miles a year?
What about usage? If the Range Rover is mainly bought to drive around inner cities, can you compare that to a Toyota Land Cruiser that is mainly used off road? (Okay, you can argue with that example, but I am sure that you get the point I am making.)
I also think the model ratings are meaningless. Last year the Skoda Citigo was near the top, the VW Up near the middle, for reliability. Both are made in the same factory with the same mechanics and electrics. Eh? How does that work then? Perhaps the VW Up has some premium options that are unreliable, so if you avoid the option, you're fine. Who knows.
The survey is marketing pants. Not sure what they are selling. Maybe they sell the survey to magazines and papers?
|