Tricky one. I'd be interested to know his reasoning to going straight to a head removal. Were any advanced diagnostics done first?
On the one hand, its not unreasonable to be expected to be paid for work done, but if he's been incompetent and come to the wrong conclusion and spent time and money pursuing that route and come to a dead end, you shouldn't be liable.
I've helped people out in a similar situation before where a garage has said that the high pressure pump needed replacing. They replaced it, problem was still there, but shrugged their shoulders and asked the customer to pay for the pump and work and that they couldn't do more.
My diagnostics showed that the problem was the lift pump in the tank. Once that was replaced the car sprung into life. The customer then used my report as defence against paying.
So, I'd get a second opinion, then use this against the original mechanic if his guesswork was way off. No small claims court will award in his favour for incompetence.
Edited by Gibbo_Wirral on 24/03/2017 at 11:47
|