Gareth, before making a final decision I suggest strongly that you research the reliability of the timing chain drive fitted to these engines. My experience indicates that as yet, VAG are incapable of producing a reliable chain drive. Some of their belt driven engines (1.9 PD diesel for example) are reliable.
All of the applications utilising American involute non-roller chains which I have looked at have proved to be unreliable and I would not be prepared to own such a drive. Caveat emptor - the internet is your friend here.
Which were the troublesome diesels and what went wrong with them?
659.
Isn't the latest VAG 1.4 TFSI a belt-cam engine? Its the main reason (shelling out to replace the belts every 70k or sooner - just maintenance costs, not a reliability issue) that I haven't considered the SEAT Leon SC 1.4 petrol (as well as my feeling that the mpg figures for this type of engine are way over the real-world figures) for my next car. The VAG 1.2 & 1.8 TFSIs are chain cam engines I believe, although I have heard of reports of unreliability as well for their chain cam engines.
I wonder whether Mazda and their different approach to their latest engine lineup (as well as using tried and tested reliable chain-driven engines [to be honest, most Japanese chain-driven engines are faily bullet-proof]) will prove the right one, given they may be reliable and trusted for mpg figures in the real world. Shame about the possible reliability issues on VAG cars at present - I really like the Leon (Audi A3 good but over priced for me). Looks like another Mazda for me when my Mazda3 expires (hopefully not for a good few years though) - maybe VAG will have gotten on top of the quality/reliability issues by then.
|