I purchased a FIAT Scudo Van in autumn 2008.
In November 2012 the car stopped due to a faulty ECU.
After having been sent by the vendor to an authorized dealership the car eventually got fully tested and repaired...at a cost of just under £2500
Initially the authorized dealership felt FIAT might cover such fault which seems very rare and my van (in light domestic use) in very good shape. FIAT however simply stated that the car was outside of their usual warranty.
I then contacted the vendor on the basis of the Sales of Goods Act. He repeatedly pointed me to FIAT Customer care, and in the end I began small claims proceedings.
I now received their formal response, saying that '...Mr K did not purchase his vehicle from our comapny. Our company is Vans Direct Ltd, company No xyz, incorporated 23 July 2009. We understand that Mr K purchased his vehicle on 10 September 2008 from Vansdirect.co.uk Ltd, Company No xyz, dissolved/ entered administration on 28 October 2009.'
Unnoticed the company I was talking to over recent months as if responsible is called Vans Direct Ltd rather than vansdirect.co.uk Ltd
All 'company' details / phone numbers / website (which is Vansdirect.co.uk) are still the same, but from a legal point of view does this mean I can consider my case closed with no redress via the Sales of Goods Act? - does anybody know for sure?
Any thoughts much appreciated to put my mind at rest,
Many thanks
Edited by NOKURCZ on 01/10/2013 at 09:37
|