I'm not a legal expert. However, some points seem clear.
1. The problem arose quickly after you bought the car and was reported to the dealer promptly.
2. You gave the dealer ample opportunity to rectify the faults. They failed to do so. The stuff about a warranty was a smokescreen designed to put you off.
3. The dealer stopped responding to you; however, it may be worth writing, recorded delivery, to the effect that you will commence legal proceedings if they do not re-imburse you for the work you have had done.
4. You have had the car fixed (I assume it's AOK?), so you now know exactly what should have been done by the dealer and you should expect them to cover the cost.
So my feeling is you have a good case and should consider proceeding with small claims action.
As regards the fees, IIRC they are on a sliding scale depending on the amount claimed, and it will cost more if the case is defended and comes to court. You will have to study the relevant pages again. If the case goes in your favour and the dealer does not pay up, you will have to consider going to the next level and involving bailiffs/sherrifs, which will again cost more.
All your costs can be claimed against the dealer as part of your case, but you may want to check that the dealer has the assets (equipment, unsold stock etc.) to cover your total claim.
The one area of uncertainty is the age/mileage of the car (which you do not state). However, the issue seems so clear-cut I don't see this as particularly relevant.
Note: "The dealer said that I wasn't within my rights to get the car fixed for free" is simply untrue.
Edited by FP on 08/08/2013 at 17:54
|