I'm no expert so looking at this from an amateurs point of view, do we assume insurance has been renewed in the period between the two crashes?
Did her own insurance have to cough up because she was at fault first time, is this going to be the same scenario, if so the insurance are going to be less understanding than if she was not at fault in the first incident.
They could i suppose decline to cover her own repair costs, if she's at fault they may well honour the third party claims, let us hope that is the worse case.
If she's not at fault then her claim is against the other party's insurer anyway her own insurer only advised as required with no actual claim on her policy, hopefully Andrews suggestion is the more likely outcome.
Lesson to be learned here, declare everything, i do, what happens if i cause a £million accident?
|