Get angry. Insist on legislation. To have any effect it needs to be capable of enforcement.
Will plod divert resources to bike rider law. Will plod get extra funds to support extra patrols. Most unlikely - at best there will be positive noises without action.
Will laws explicitly related to e-bikes and scooters have the effect of deterring their inappropriate construction or use. Unlikely - they make no difference at present.
Would the law (insurance, power, helmets, numberplates, bike registration etc) apply to minors below 16. Would force kids onto push bikes - are they actually any safer anyway.
The death of folk, particularly children, is upsetting especially for the family. The only enforceable change that should be made is helmet wearing - other than this, if the law cannot or will not be applied there is zero point in wasting time or energy.
|
|
What are they supposed to do? They're already illegal. If they try to chase them, they seem to to end up crashing and dying.
I saw a load of kids on these electric motorbikes in the park the other day. They're certainly an annoyance and a hazard, but I'm not sure what the solution is. Eventually, I suppose, imports will be more tightly controlled, prices will go up and they'll fall out of fashion.
|
|
A_T you may be made of Kryptonite but I think most pedestrians hit by a moving metal scooter or bike would probably suffer serious injury!
|
I wonder how many of these are used by drug dealers?.............................................................
|
I wonder how many of these are used by drug dealers?.............................................................
I doubt they would risk using the official / legal trial e scooters & bikes in certain parts of the UK as there constantly tracked.
|
|
|
A_T you may be made of Kryptonite but I think most pedestrians hit by a moving metal scooter or bike would probably suffer serious injury!
I have not yet witnessed any of these contraptions, but I would assume that most riders weigh more than the bike or scooter, so a collision between a rapid rider and an almost stationary pedestrian might damage both similarly. The vehicle is solid, of course, so could do damage depending on what hit what.
|
I wonder how many of these are used by drug dealers?
Only last week I saw a yoof on his E-Scooter stop (as expected he was on the pavement) and put on a balaclava (the type when only your eyes show), pull up his hoodie put on gloves and ride off.
Was he up to no good I wonder.
|
I wonder how many of these are used by drug dealers?
Only last week I saw a yoof on his E-Scooter stop (as expected he was on the pavement) and put on a balaclava (the type when only your eyes show), pull up his hoodie put on gloves and ride off.
Was he up to no good I wonder.
In this warm weather, almost certainly ?
|
The accepted ‘uniform’ when riding an illegal electric motorcycle (usually on one wheel) is a balaclava.
I’d always assumed it was for anonymity, given the number of offences being committed.
|
There was another accident local to me, with an off-road e-motorcycle riding into a parked car. The rider's described as being in a serious but stable condition in Addenbrookes.
Note the e-motorcycle is described as off-road, so, presumably, no licence, tax, insurance or number plate, but collided with a parked car on a road!
|
|
The Police couldn't find their own backsides.
That's if they could be bothered to look.
Very few people take the Police seriously these days.
Who thinks they will clamp down now?
The Laws are already in place to keep these things off Paths and Roads.
Who Polices these Laws ???
Not the Police!
|
The Police couldn't find their own backsides.
That's if they could be bothered to look.
Very few people take the Police seriously these days.
Who thinks they will clamp down now?
The Laws are already in place to keep these things off Paths and Roads.
Who Polices these Laws ???
Not the Police!
I think people have a strange attitude to the law now, and if you saw the speed those E-bikes and Scooters go with their manoeuvrability, its no surprise they cannot be caught. I have seen the Police chase these and they just disappear into the woods, Police cannot follow and no good running after them, too fast.
|
Two police officers in Ely Cardiff served with gross misconduct notices for following 2 lads on a reported £4000 e-bike who were sadly killed. The police were nowhere near the scene of the accident when they fell off. Not a dickie bird said so far about the illegality of riding 2 up on an illegal e-bike. I suppose that is the job of the coroner. The police these days don't seem to have the support of their commanders
|
Not a dickie bird said so far about the illegality of riding 2 up on an illegal e-bike.
Around my way they do it on E-scooters as well, do as they please all the time, shoot in front of cars at junctions and often race across pedestrian crossing, but what they can do about them I don`t know as there are more on the road than ever, never seen one in the dark with lights on and rider usually has dark clothes on so very hard to see
|
Two police officers in Ely Cardiff served with gross misconduct notices for following 2 lads on a reported £4000 e-bike who were sadly killed. The police were nowhere near the scene of the accident when they fell off. Not a dickie bird said so far about the illegality of riding 2 up on an illegal e-bike. I suppose that is the job of the coroner. The police these days don't seem to have the support of their commanders
It just means they are being investigated to find out exactly what has happened. They have not had diciplinarys yet.
|
Two police officers in Ely Cardiff served with gross misconduct notices for following 2 lads on a reported £4000 e-bike who were sadly killed. The police were nowhere near the scene of the accident when they fell off. Not a dickie bird said so far about the illegality of riding 2 up on an illegal e-bike. I suppose that is the job of the coroner. The police these days don't seem to have the support of their commanders
It just means they are being investigated to find out exactly what has happened. They have not had diciplinarys yet.
Yes that is correct. Does little for police moral I would suggest. Just what do we pay the pay the police to do when they see wrong being committed sit in they car eating Haribo sweeties. I love that advert!
|
Yes that is correct. Does little for police moral I would suggest. Just what do we pay the pay the police to do when they see wrong being committed sit in they car eating Haribo sweeties. I love that advert!
They're being investigated/dealt with under the protocols shared between the force managers and the Police Federation.
What's wrong with that?
|
Yes that is correct. Does little for police moral I would suggest. Just what do we pay the pay the police to do when they see wrong being committed sit in they car eating Haribo sweeties. I love that advert!
They're being investigated/dealt with under the protocols shared between the force managers and the Police Federation.
What's wrong with that?
Like everything else in the public sector lets do something to slow the whole process of efficiency and common sense down so nothing gets done.
|
Like everything else in the public sector lets do something to slow the whole process of efficiency and common sense down so nothing gets done.
So you're a dead efficient private sector employer.
There have been massively well publicised deaths involving your staff. There is, at its lowest, a possibility that SOPs were not followed. How do you deal with gathering evidence etc?
|
<< There have been massively well publicised deaths involving your staff. There is, at its lowest, a possibility that SOPs were not followed. How do you deal with gathering evidence etc? >>
Quite so, Bromp, but you must admit that rigid procedures do have an amazing tendency to slow down results to a glacial speed, because (I assume) everyone involved has to tick every possible box laid down in the process. It's hard to define a happy medium, but one could be very beneficial.
|
Things often take a long time in the public sector, mainly because of the public.
We have a litigious, blame seeking culture. Anything that goes wrong is the responsibility of someone (police, doctors, etc).
The public sector is risk averse. They understandably put in place procedures to minimise the risk of blame. For the police this includes body cams, statements, evidence collection, documentation, review processes etc etc etc.
All very commendable - no one should be arrested or convicted without sound reason. However, it takes time, drags resources away from more hands on policing, makes them disinclined to pursue minor offences as the effort required is disproportionate.
The days of Dixon of Dock Green when police were respected members of the community upholding the law are long gone. More recent Sweeney inspired policing with apparent authority to maim the crims as they saw fit has also long passed.
Allocating blame to the police for death or injury in the appropriate pursuit of wrongdoers is effective acceptance of illegal activity. If they are inhibited from giving chase because of the risks we should repeal the laws as they are never going to be enforced.
We do need to understand the reasons for the deaths of those on e-bikes and scooters. If they were riding illegally modified machines or foolishly I have limited sympathy.
|
Things often take a long time in the public sector, mainly because of the public.
We have a litigious, blame seeking culture. Anything that goes wrong is the responsibility of someone (police, doctors, etc).
The public sector is risk averse. They understandably put in place procedures to minimise the risk of blame. For the police this includes body cams, statements, evidence collection, documentation, review processes etc etc etc.
All very commendable - no one should be arrested or convicted without sound reason. However, it takes time, drags resources away from more hands on policing, makes them disinclined to pursue minor offences as the effort required is disproportionate.
The days of Dixon of Dock Green when police were respected members of the community upholding the law are long gone. More recent Sweeney inspired policing with apparent authority to maim the crims as they saw fit has also long passed.
Allocating blame to the police for death or injury in the appropriate pursuit of wrongdoers is effective acceptance of illegal activity. If they are inhibited from giving chase because of the risks we should repeal the laws as they are never going to be enforced.
We do need to understand the reasons for the deaths of those on e-bikes and scooters. If they were riding illegally modified machines or foolishly I have limited sympathy.
"""We do need to understand the reasons for the deaths of those on e-bikes and scooters. If they were riding illegally modified machines or foolishly I have limited sympathy."""
Regrettably someone in one of the lads family bought the e-bike costing a reported £4k. It does make one wonder how it is legal to sell these things. Only a couple of days after the accident the police issued a GPS showing their vehicle half a mile away and no longer following and no other vehicle was involved.
Why do the police have to make this enquiry sound so dramatic "" gross negligence" I do not think so. Nobody takes any responsibility these days for their actions it is always someone else's fault. This particular incident sparked a full scale riot and those in charge are adopting an approach so as not to inflame the situation I expect this will give the police officers doing a lawful job moths of sleepless nights before it is resolved
|
Things often take a long time in the public sector, mainly because of the public.
We have a litigious, blame seeking culture. Anything that goes wrong is the responsibility of someone (police, doctors, etc).
The public sector is risk averse. They understandably put in place procedures to minimise the risk of blame. For the police this includes body cams, statements, evidence collection, documentation, review processes etc etc etc.
All very commendable - no one should be arrested or convicted without sound reason. However, it takes time, drags resources away from more hands on policing, makes them disinclined to pursue minor offences as the effort required is disproportionate.
The days of Dixon of Dock Green when police were respected members of the community upholding the law are long gone. More recent Sweeney inspired policing with apparent authority to maim the crims as they saw fit has also long passed.
Allocating blame to the police for death or injury in the appropriate pursuit of wrongdoers is effective acceptance of illegal activity. If they are inhibited from giving chase because of the risks we should repeal the laws as they are never going to be enforced.
We do need to understand the reasons for the deaths of those on e-bikes and scooters. If they were riding illegally modified machines or foolishly I have limited sympathy.
"""We do need to understand the reasons for the deaths of those on e-bikes and scooters. If they were riding illegally modified machines or foolishly I have limited sympathy."""
Regrettably someone in one of the lads family bought the e-bike costing a reported £4k. It does make one wonder how it is legal to sell these things. Only a couple of days after the accident the police issued a GPS showing their vehicle half a mile away and no longer following and no other vehicle was involved.
Why do the police have to make this enquiry sound so dramatic "" gross negligence" I do not think so. Nobody takes any responsibility these days for their actions it is always someone else's fault. This particular incident sparked a full scale riot and those in charge are adopting an approach so as not to inflame the situation I expect this will give the police officers doing a lawful job moths of sleepless nights before it is resolved
I believe the line usually trotted out when the boot is on the other foot is "if you've done nothing wrong you have nothing to fear".
In any case, I think we would all rather live in a country where things are thoroughly, even tediously, investigated rather than simply accepting that anyone who dies whilst committing a crime is wholly responsible.
|
I recommend to those interested in 'thorough' investigations those you will find at this link:
www.gov.uk/raib-reports
These cover every possible contributory factor in rail accidents, similar ones are to be found on the site for MAIB (marine accident investigation board).
Invariably human errors are the basic cause, but the other factors can make the consequences more severe.
|
Regrettably someone in one of the lads family bought the e-bike costing a reported £4k. It does make one wonder how it is legal to sell these things. Only a couple of days after the accident the police issued a GPS showing their vehicle half a mile away and no longer following and no other vehicle was involved.
There are differing reports as to what exactly happened and in what order. The police say the van was half a mile away at the time of impact but there are at least two pieces of camera footage showing the following the bike at first quite close quarters and later (?) from a distance.
Presumably the bike hit something solid. There are reports of a bus but others say no other vehicles; a wall or solid fence?
Why do the police have to make this enquiry sound so dramatic "" gross negligence" I do not think so. Nobody takes any responsibility these days for their actions it is always someone else's fault. This particular incident sparked a full scale riot and those in charge are adopting an approach so as not to inflame the situation I expect this will give the police officers doing a lawful job moths of sleepless nights before it is resolved
The phrase you used earlier was not gross negligence but gross misconduct. The former is around apportionment of blame etc in court proceedings either criminally such as for manslaughter or in a civil court when seeking compensation.
The latter relates to employment. An employee found to have committed gross misconduct will have done something so serious that the employee/employer relationship is irredeemably broken. In that circumstance the employee can be dismissed forthwith and without compensation. Gross misconduct might be theft, lying, falsifying records etc. If there is a suspicion of offending at that level then the employer will want a full investigation with all facts etc unearthed. While, in a Police context, the type and seriousness of offending been addressed is relevant even people in stolen vehicles or those, as here being driven illegally and perhaps recklessly have rights to life etc.
We cannot, as a society, simply right their deaths off as collateral damage for their own stupidity etc.
|
I feel sure the police in their many statements have chosen their words better than I have done. May be I was too relaxed about believing what the police are telling the public of how the accident happened. Misconduct or negligence is only mincing words. The police are legally entitled to pursue law breakers and the country would be in a worse state than it is if a police officer has to ask permission from a senior one to tackle crime being committed. Again the officers involved have hurt no one or for that matter caused people to injure themselves. Criminals or people acting recklessly will do anything these days to escape justice. In the case of this general post you can only blame the Gov to allow kids access to these machines. The public are wising up to their dangers. Only a few months ago there was a similar thread on here about this subject and the general consensus was that they were the bees knees. I have nothing against e-bikes or e-scooter but the reality is there use is largely out of control and will only get worse.
""We cannot, as a society, simply right their deaths off as collateral damage for their own stupidity etc.""
NO we cannot, but what will change if society gives young people the tools to kill or injure themselves or worse still innocent members of that same society. Yes young people steal cars and motorbikes but they are not freely available to most.
|
... Misconduct or negligence is only mincing words. ....
Not really - one is a sin of commission, the other a sin of omission. Think about it. Legally different.
|
NO we cannot, but what will change if society gives young people the tools to kill or injure themselves or worse still innocent members of that same society. Yes young people steal cars and motorbikes but they are not freely available to most.
Too much to deal with at once, but there is absolutely nothing stopping anyone from going on eBay and marketplace and buying a car, motorbike or scooter from a private seller.
|
We cannot, as a society, simply right their deaths off as collateral damage for their own stupidity etc.
If two young lads die as a result of them riding a vehicle which is not allowed on the road, I fail to see why 'society' needs to get involved other than to use this episode to demonstrate to the youth of today that their actions have consequences, even if it's for a tiktok video.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|