What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Genesis - SLO76
Apologies for the rum induced nostalgia moment, but what was the car which instigated your lifelong interest in cars? For me, after a childhood of dozing in the back of a series of Volvo 340’s my dad suddenly went a bit mad and turned up one night in a 1985 C plate (2 years old at the time) Saab 900 16v Turbo 4dr in metallic burgundy with tan interior and all of 175bhp which was a huge number for 1988. I was so impressed and it awoke the petrolhead within. It led to a series of interesting, slightly left field choices which followed, from Volvo 240 GLT, 440 Turbo, Audi 80 16v Sport and Honda Civic VTi. He didn’t half waste money on cars from that Saab onwards but I am today grateful that he did.
Genesis - nellyjak

Always had a soft spot for a Volvo...having had a 264..a 764..a V70..and a 340 thrown in along the say too (briefly..wasn't big enough..lol)

Love the Saab too...only had a "vert for a couple of years but was impressed.

Volvo and Saab have been the only two makes that have come close to my current V6 Toyota Estima in terms of seat comfort.

Genesis - Alby Back
Think I was hooked when I was given my first pedal car at about 3 years old. ;-)

My family has always been into cars, my grandfather had motorbikes and cars before the First World War. My dad had them from the 1920s, and both my brother and I had them from age 17 as has my wife and indeed my son.




Genesis - badbusdriver

No one car for me, but, inadvertently, a person. The headmaster at my school in the Shetland Isles was a huge car fan, and because of this, he got all the magazines. After reading them, he would leave them in the school library, where upon I would nick them (usually Autocar or Motor) to pour over at home.

Out of the cars my Dad has had, the one I'm most interested in now didn't make much of an impression at the time. That was a DAF 55, a little dutch saloon car using a Renault engine (1100cc I think) along with the 'Variomatic' CVT transmission. Apart from the CVT aspect, this had a weird setup whereby each rear wheel had its own 'drive'. In theory, the car could go as fast in reverse as it could forwards (maybe about 80mph?). But I'd love one now and there are still plenty kicking about in the Netherlands. The coupe version is a particularly pretty little thing 48546629692_e1f48b0cae_b.jpg

Just to point out, I clicked on this thinking you were going to talk about Hyundai's luxury offshoot!

Edited by badbusdriver on 21/08/2021 at 08:40

Genesis - SLO76
We had one of those wee Daf Variomatics, a late model with the Renault 1400 in it which apparently made it quite lively away from the lights. Was before my time though, they bought a 1976 P Renault 6 TX when I arrived.
Genesis - craig-pd130

My family didn't have a car until I was 14, but my dad always had motorbikes and some of my earliest memories are of 'helping' him service / rebuild them, so my path towards being a fully paid-up petrolhead and biker started early.

The first car that really turned my head was a Jensen Interceptor when I was around 8 or 9 years old. A car dealer near the centre of my home town had one in bright yellow that I used to see from the bus window, it stood out like a shark in an aquarium. My mum bought me the Dinky model Interceptor which was the same colour. Shortly after my 50th birthday I got to realise my dream and drove an Interceptor III for a 270-mile day (as I described here: www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?t=106212 )

Then my friend's dad had a Capri 3000GXL, and being driven in that introduced me to the concept of torquey engines.

Genesis - SLO76
“ Then my friend's dad had a Capri 3000GXL, and being driven in that introduced me to the concept of torquey engines.”

A very appealing vehicle especially as a young child.
Genesis - craig-pd130
“ Then my friend's dad had a Capri 3000GXL, and being driven in that introduced me to the concept of torquey engines.” A very appealing vehicle especially as a young child.

Indeed - in hindsight, laughably low-powered by today's standards at 135bhp but quite a light car with a mile-wide spread of torque. There weren't many cars around at the time that would give you that pushed-back-in-the-seat feeling.

This period Autocar road test of a 3-litre manual gives the 0-60 as 10.3s with a 113mph top whack :-D

www.flickr.com/photos/triggerscarstuff/sets/721576.../

Genesis - badbusdriver

This period Autocar road test of a 3-litre manual gives the 0-60 as 10.3s with a 113mph top whack :-D

That deceives the actual performance through low gearing and slightly slow heavy shift. Its the reason you shouldn't really pay too much attention to the 0-60 time as it is an utterly meaningless figure for real life. Look at the in gear figures for a better indication of how it will feel on the road, i.e, plenty quick enough for its brakes and suspension. The top speed may look low, but that is 43mph higher than the UK legal limit, so what would the point be of giving it longer legs?, that would just lose drivability at the kind of speeds the car will actually be driven at.

Genesis - movilogo

>> lifelong interest in cars

I have lost interest in cars in recent years. For me car is now something that takes me to my destination reliably, safely, comfortably and without costing too much money in maintenance.

Genesis - madf

>> lifelong interest in cars

I have lost interest in cars in recent years. For me car is now something that takes me to my destination reliably, safely, comfortably and without costing too much money in maintenance.

I disagree slightly.

"For me car is now something that takes me to my destination reliably, safely, comfortably and without costing too much money in maintenance and is nearly 100% reliable or as close as possible"

Genesis - Alby Back
I still like cars very much, but my attitude to them has shifted from them being the most desirable things in my life, to them being enabling platforms for the things I want from life.

In other words, if they can't reliably, safely and comfortably contain and shift the people and things I want with me most of the time, then no matter how otherwise nice they might be, then they're no use to me.

I probably spend more on mountain biking than cars these days. That does thrill me, and there are no cameras...

;-)
Genesis - galileo
I still like cars very much, but my attitude to them has shifted from them being the most desirable things in my life, to them being enabling platforms for the things I want from life. In other words, if they can't reliably, safely and comfortably contain and shift the people and things I want with me most of the time, then no matter how otherwise nice they might be, then they're no use to me. I probably spend more on mountain biking than cars these days. That does thrill me, and there are no cameras... ;-)

Just curious, how many times has mountain biking been unsafe for you?

Anyone I have known who used two wheeled transport has had at least one injury accident, in one case fatal and another suffering brain injury despite wearing (and breaking) a helmet.

Genesis - Alby Back
@galileo

Yes, I've "dismounted involuntarily" more times than I could possibly count or remember. We were building primitive mountain bikes for use on Scottish mountain trails from childhood nearly fifty years ago. But, it comes with the territory really. I suppose I've always had a bit of a penchant for more extreme activities. Horse riding, skiing, windsurfing and so on. Fortunately, my wife is similarly, if not more so inclined. Maybe it's not wise, but it is fun. What else are you supposed to do at the weekend anyway?

Heh Ho eh?

No pain no gain etc.

;-)
Genesis - SLO76
I still like cars very much, but my attitude to them has shifted from them being the most desirable things in my life, to them being enabling platforms for the things I want from life. In other words, if they can't reliably, safely and comfortably contain and shift the people and things I want with me most of the time, then no matter how otherwise nice they might be, then they're no use to me. I probably spend more on mountain biking than cars these days. That does thrill me, and there are no cameras... ;-)

I get that. I find modern cars soulless and that’s only likely to worsen via electrification. They’re appliances. Efficient, quick and safe but dull to look at and drive. There’s no feel, no fun, no manual gearbox. I also like my mountain biking, it’s what kept me sane over the last year or so between Covid and personal illness. Getting out on the bike exploring has kept my mind occupied especially here in Ayrshire which has some glorious off-road cycling routes and some very interesting old industrial sites worth a visit, the old ICI site at Ardeer in particular. I’ve covered every metre of the place and have a comprehensive photo collection of this and much of Ayrshire’s old mining industrial sites. My bike however is next to valueless, though it was pricey when I bought it in 2003. It’s been the most reliable vehicle I’ve ever owned. It is in need of an update though.

Edited by SLO76 on 21/08/2021 at 20:31

Genesis - Andrew-T

<< Ayrshire ... has some glorious off-road cycling routes and some very interesting old industrial sites worth a visit, the old ICI site at Ardeer in particular. >>

Interesting you should mention Ardeer. As a one-time ICI man I visited that site in 1971, when I was briefly in the Safety business. Spent a few hours watching some explosions - it used to be Nobel Explosives Ltd I think.

Genesis - Andrew-T

I have lost interest in cars in recent years. For me car is now something that takes me to my destination reliably, safely, comfortably and without costing too much money in maintenance.

I know what you mean. Cars have become too complex to work on, too uninspiring and clumsy to look at, and have no 'character', for want of a better word.

Genesis - craig-pd130

That deceives the actual performance through low gearing and slightly slow heavy shift. Its the reason you shouldn't really pay too much attention to the 0-60 time as it is an utterly meaningless figure for real life. Look at the in gear figures for a better indication of how it will feel on the road, i.e, plenty quick enough for its brakes and suspension. The top speed may look low, but that is 43mph higher than the UK legal limit, so what would the point be of giving it longer legs?, that would just lose drivability at the kind of speeds the car will actually be driven at.

Very true, although while it's got decent in-gear shove (especially compared to other cars of the early 70s) it's no fireball.

I do agree that a top speed of much more than 100mph is more or less useless for UK roads, although a tall top ratio is useful for motorway cruising. Laycock overdrive, anyone?

Genesis - Manatee

Indeed - in hindsight, laughably low-powered by today's standards at 135bhp but quite a light car with a mile-wide spread of torque. There weren't many cars around at the time that would give you that pushed-back-in-the-seat feeling.

This period Autocar road test of a 3-litre manual gives the 0-60 as 10.3s

And of course it would be just as quick now. The point being that today's cars are pointlessly powerful. Every preening middle manager thinks he (it's usually a he, but not exclusively) needs at least 250bhp. I might have been one myself when I applied for the Legacy turbo as a company car, although I prefer to think I was just a car enthusiast.

The car that made the biggest impression on me at the time, 40 years ago, was a 1600 Golf GTI with about 110bhp. I had never driven anything like it and it would still have the performance I want. In fact my 'toy' MX-5 1.5 fulfils that criterion quite well - with a bit more power and, incredibly, about 180Kg more weight despite being light by today's standards.

Genesis - Alby Back
A Bugatti Veyron couldn't have got me down the M5 and into Somerset yesterday any quicker or indeed more slowly, than my lowly 180bhp diesel estate did.

Utter bedlam. At first, I reserved most of my ire for anyone with a caravan or motorhome, then, after a while, it extended to anyone with a top box. Then I began to dislike anyone with so much luggage that they couldn't see out of the back of their wobbling SUV.

The trucks became increasingly hateful in time, the vans more so, and well, let's not start on those with pick ups.

Once onto the rural Somerset section, it then became apparent that everyone with a tractor had conferred and decided to come out and jam up all the roads that were being used by this innocent party from Cheshire who was just trying to get somewhere to do some work.

Every pensioner with a walking frame had rallied round to ensure that every zebra crossing was obstructed for as long as possible, and of course every wide vehicle was out, deliberately being used to grind every narrow stretch to a complete halt while other wide vehicles intentionally and mean spiritedly went the other way so that they could only pass each other at a snails pace.

Ultimately, I hated them all.

Genesis - Engineer Andy

I hope your windscreen wipers were working ok, needing to remove all that red mist from your vision! :-)

Genesis - Engineer Andy

Whilst I always showed an interest in cars just because my parents would take me/my sister out for a drive or to visiti grandaparents on weekends, I would say what really got me interested in cars was me being given toy cars and seeing flashy cars of varying types - racing cars for Formula 1, etc, and fast cars on TV shows such as Starkey & Hutch, Knight Rider, etc.

Being taken to the Motor Show at the NEC back in the late 1980s helped as well, as did the fathers of school friends and eventually my cousin owning some very nice sporty cars. The most my Dad ever got was to a bog-stand Ford Escort.

Genesis - Terry W

For me it wasn't any particular car that got me interested. Growing up in the 1960s the car was the route to adulthood, freedom, a social life, girls etc.

That I was also fascinated by how things worked meant cars were an opportunity to use skill and knowledge to make it go faster, more reliable, smoother, handle better etc.

In my 20s I was able to afford better cars (before marriage and kids) - faster, bigger etc was very attractive.

Time moves on and beyond a certain point extra performance is now really quite academic. Reliability and comfort are key. Money, whilst not an issue, is a consideration - do I spend £30k on a car or winter in Spain for the next 5 years? The latter wins out every time.

I also know that if presented with a car capable of 0-60 in 5 seconds and able to corner on rails I no longer have the skill or reflexes to exploit it (if I ever did!)

Genesis - badbusdriver

I find modern cars soulless and that’s only likely to worsen via electrification. They’re appliances. Efficient, quick and safe but dull to look at and drive.

Read an article in a classic car magazine the other day about a 21 year old who's daily driver is a 1933 Riley Monaco saloon!. I should point out that he does actually work for Blue Diamond, a well known Riley specialist, but even so, kudos to him!.

He say's,

"The wipers work, so there's no reason I can't use it in the rain, and I didn't hesitate during the winter. I was out in the snow, and yes, it was very, very cold, but I wore there layers, gloves and a hat, and the engine started first time, every time"

Great to hear stuff like this and the headline of the article was, "Much more fun than a Fiesta".

Here is a picture of one (not his)

4.jpg

Genesis - madf

I owned and drove daily a 1929 Riley Monaco - same mechanics, fabric body.

No syncromesh

Vacuum wipers Cable brakes . No servo action (of course)

Petrol tank tank mounted in engine compartment above driver's feet. (gravity feed)

A deathtrap on wheels. (I was 18 at the time.)

Genesis - barney100

Nostalgia at the Basingstoke car fest last weekend. Capris, Cortinas, Morris minors, Saabs etc. Car I always loved was the MGB, mate had one in the 70s in white, real dials and went like the clappers or so it seemed.

Genesis - badbusdriver

I owned and drove daily a 1929 Riley Monaco - same mechanics, fabric body.

No syncromesh

Vacuum wipers Cable brakes . No servo action (of course)

Petrol tank tank mounted in engine compartment above driver's feet. (gravity feed)

A deathtrap on wheels. (I was 18 at the time.)

I'm sure most, if not all cars of that era had similar levels of safety (lack of). Doesn't really make them 'deathtraps', a very overdramatic term if ever there was one.

Car I always loved was the MGB, mate had one in the 70s in white, real dials and went like the clappers or so it seemed.

The MGB wasn't an especially fast car, even in its day, but nor was it especially slow. The 1800 motor gave it enough power to be usefully quick within the limitations of its suspension and brakes. And being low to the ground makes it feel faster!.

Genesis - Manatee

Nostalgia at the Basingstoke car fest last weekend. Capris, Cortinas, Morris minors, Saabs etc. Car I always loved was the MGB, mate had one in the 70s in white, real dials and went like the clappers or so it seemed.

Saw a B GT this morning, parked outside Screwfix. It was in between a recentish Fiesta, and a MINI, and it looked tiny - not a novel observation. Had it not been a GT I might have mistaken it for a Spridget.

Genesis - Big John

For a while my dad had a late version Vauxhall VX 4/90 2300 shortly after a mkII Cortina 1300. I was just driving then and what a transformation - at the time it felt like a sports car and was great on a motorway especially with that fab overdrive. It rather liked a drink of 4star though - the only saving grace was with the twin carbs you got a few useful seconds warning as you ran out of petrol when it dropped onto two cylinders as one carb lost fuel before the other.

I've always hankered after a suitable "wolf in sheep's clothing" ever since. I came close with my last ever company car circa 1992 which was a Saab 9000 cs turbo, fab, comfy, fast car.

Edited by Big John on 23/08/2021 at 22:43

Genesis - badbusdriver

I've always hankered after a suitable "wolf in sheep's clothing" ever since. I came close with my last ever company car circa 1992 which was a Saab 9000 cs turbo, fab, comfy, fast car.

From 1990-1995 I worked at a SAAB dealer, and I well remember when the 9000CS was introduced. I always thought the high level brake light looked like someone had taken the illuminated sign from the roof of a black cab and stuck it on the top of the tailgate facing backwards.

But as for a wolf in sheep's clothing, the best example of that I remember was actually a 9000CD saloon. This was in the most basic trim and didn't even have alloys, but it did have the 200bhp 2.3 turbo engine!. It was a demonstrator, so I had plenty of opportunities to get behind the wheel and go out 'hunting'!. Wasn't great at putting all that torque through the front wheels on a damp road, but good fun in the dry!.

Genesis - pd

I wonder how the Thema 8.32 (on the same platform as the Saab) coped! I think that had 220ish bhp.

Genesis - badbusdriver

I wonder how the Thema 8.32 (on the same platform as the Saab) coped! I think that had 220ish bhp.

The main problem with getting the power down in the SAAB was the amount of torque at low revs. While the Thema 8.32 did have more power (215bhp) than the early 2.3 turbo, it had less torque which peaked much higher up the rev range than the SAAB (209lb/ft @ 4500rpm vs 243lb/ft @ 2000rpm).

The top of the range 9000CS Aero upped the power to 225bhp and torque to 258lb/ft @ 1900rpm. The boss had one of them (needless to say!) and it was a very impressive car (for the time). Magnificent seats too (front and back)!.

Genesis - craig-pd130

I wonder how the Thema 8.32 (on the same platform as the Saab) coped! I think that had 220ish bhp.

The main problem with getting the power down in the SAAB was the amount of torque at low revs.

20-odd years ago now I had the old-style Volvo S40 T4 for a while. Slightly less grunt than the Saab (220lb-ft at around 2,750rpm) but even so, the torque-steer in 3rd gear coming off a roundabout was epic if I was enthusiastic with the throttle.

Genesis - badbusdriver

20-odd years ago now I had the old-style Volvo S40 T4 for a while. Slightly less grunt than the Saab (220lb-ft at around 2,750rpm) but even so, the torque-steer in 3rd gear coming off a roundabout was epic if I was enthusiastic with the throttle.

Just last night browsing Autotrader I came upon a Volvo S80 T6 (now gone, I've checked!). It had around 80k miles, looked tidy enough and the asking price was well under £2k, which seemed something of a bargain.

Its 272bhp and 280lb/ft (from 2000rpm) all went through the front wheels!.

Genesis - Big John

Magnificent seats too (front and back)!.

Saab 9000 seats - wow they were fabulous

Genesis - badbusdriver

Magnificent seats too (front and back)!.

Saab 9000 seats - wow they were fabulous

Yes they were, but those in the 9000CS Aero were in a different league, check them out!

saab-9000-hatchback-5-doors-1997-model-interior-photos-0.jpg

Genesis - RT

Magnificent seats too (front and back)!.

Saab 9000 seats - wow they were fabulous

Yes they were, but those in the 9000CS Aero were in a different league, check them out!

saab-9000-hatchback-5-doors-1997-model-interior-photos-0.jpg

When GM got involved with Saab, those of us loyal to Vauxhall hoped that some of Saab's features would percolate onto Vauxhalls - but sadly it was the other way round.