Well, it's been far too cold to be messing around with cars outside for at least the past 5 weeks so no further investigation was done. However, now the temperatures are on the rise, I decided it was about time to continue trying to find the problem. So, a few days ago I removed the battery from the car and did a major clean up of the main terminals and 'negative' connectors. The battery posts were quite dull with oxide as were the terminals so these were given a good going over with emery paper back to bright metal. As the battery was off the car I thought it might be a good idea to give it a top up charge on the bench. I connected the charger and lo and behold the ammeter went straight up to 5 amps (max) and stayed there for the best part of 5 hours ! After that the charge rate gradually dropped to just under 1 amp at which point it didn't seem to want to take any more. Conclusion for all this.... the battery was almost flat.
Question though...... why was this not picked up on the garage's battery test equipment? All indications were about normal according to them. Also why was the battery capable of cranking a freezing cold engine without failing completely? Very odd in my book.
My own opinion...... Fiat somehow manage to arrange some sort of priority with the distribution of available current during starting and in this case I suspect that although there was just about enough for the starter, there wasn't sufficient volts / amps for the ECU, hence the trip computer and clock resetting. Curious to say the least.
I will be soldiering on for the summer months using this original battery (monitoring it closely) but will be replacing it in the autumn. I will probably look at getting a heavier duty type as most of my driving is short distance and there isn't a lot of time to recharge what's been taken out in a cold start situation.
|