Dear Mr Fitzgerald,
I would like to start with thanking you for a very prompt reply. I hope you do not mind if we continue our conversation on “HonestJohn Forum” so other existing policy holders and future policy buyers can follow it.
I agree with you that using “appropriate channels” was right to resolve this matter with your Nominee Repair Centre. The Verdict of HM Court of Justice brought a lot of satisfaction as I proved in court that your Nominee Repair Centre was wrong on several counts. I would like to just bring some of them:
· Failure to provide satisfactory service
· Providing misleading information
· Carrying jobs without authorisation
· Failure to provide invoice for work carried
· Loosing/hiding car parts which were vital to obtain a cause of failure and which were not available for the inspector.
I would like to bring also to your attention quote from the policy booklet which says:
“In addition, the Nominee Repair Centre Network has been chosen because of the standard and quality of their operations”
I think HM Court of Justice verified that statement in June 2012.
I strongly disagree with your comment: I can confirm our last contact with anyone regarding this was a request from your solicitor received 9th November 2011 to provide details of conversations with the repairer. This was compiled and provided 15 th November 2011.” as my solicitor send you another letter in the summer of 2012 on the Court Case completion. We are still awaiting your reply.
I strongly disagree with your comment: “I cannot agree that we, at Motorway Direct, have either failed you as seller of the cover nor shown no attempt to resolve. The Dealer Care Extended Guarantee was provided by Essex Saab with your vehicle at point of purchase, this product is the dealers Guarantee on your vehicle which was administered by us on their behalf. The cover was not sold by us and, furthermore, we have made numerous attempts to progress a claim for you however were unable to do in line with the terms of the dealer’s Guarantee.” to support that please refer to facts below:
· In my recent communication from summer 2012 (date to be confirmed) I have also raised another very important issue with my policy. There was a claim on my policy for Fuel Injection Pump. It only came to my attention when I received my Inspection Report through post in 2011(please refer to page 2 of Dekkra Report). I`m asking The AA/Motorways Direct again for full details of this claim as It was not me who made the claim in December 2008. It is a crucial piece of information which is still kept away from me and in my view could have made a positive impact on my claim in 2009.
· I would like to bring to your attention another fact. In the correspondence to Geoff Nolan from 11/10/2011 I requested information about why it took 2 years to send me Dekkra Inspection Report which was done by Dekkra on 4/08/2009. Has Motorways Direct ever answered that question? Answer to this question is very important to me.
· In July 2009 you acknowledged first problems with your Nominee Repair Centre because of my first concerns I shared with The AA/Motorway Direct Customer Service. You failed to support me. I called and complaint about lack of progress. In my opinion my car should have been moved to another Nominee Repair Centre.
· On 4/08/2009 you acknowledged another problem which appeared after inspection carried on my vehicle. There was some parts missing which made inspection inconclusive and therefore my claim was rejected. Yet again I felt let down and left without any support from The AA/Motorways Direct. It was another signal that the Nominee Repair Centre is not capable to carry any work on my car. In my opinion it should have rang another warning bell and car should have been moved to another Nominee Repair Centre.
· In September 2009 I requested my car to be moved as there were trust issues between myself and your Nominee Repair Centre. You Nominee Repair Centre lost parts which were crucial for inspection. They could not find any way to progress with initial inspection. Car had been left in the yard with all parts inside on seats which caused further damage to interior. Further work had been carried without my authorisation. I wanted to proceed with claim but in another Nominee Repair Centre. Please may you kindly advise me where were your support then? You left me again without support. I refused to pay for release fee for work carried as it was unauthorised and with unsatisfactory service. The only choice was to take action through “appropriate channels”.
· In Year 2009 I made another complaint and this time I did it through“appropriate channels” and amazingly you sent me a letter about my claim being reinstated as a goodwill gesture for all my inconveniences.
· On 14 th November 2009 (email to Simon Short) I demanded all details of Dekkra Report in writing. Report came through the post in October 2011 only because I used as you wrote ““appropriate channels” and the court order were issued.
All above are facts and in my opinion The AA/Motorways Direct showed lack of customer care in my case. In fact to this day I have not received any apology letter or compensation of any kind from The AA/Motorways Direct. After 3 years long legal battle I proved your Nominee Repair Centre they were wrong. It is your Nominee Repair Centre which held my car in ransom without any legal right to do so. It is your Nominee Repair Centre which I had to battle in court for 3 years and I had to spend over £6000 in legal fees. It is your Nominee Repair Centre Network so you should take direct responsibility for their actions. It is your obligation to us as customers who pay hundreds of pounds for policies which in fact are worthless.
I strongly claim that The AA/Motorways Direct failed to provide satisfactory level of customer care.
I again strongly demand the following information to be provided:
· Written fully investigated details of fraudulent claim made in 2008. Please state: who authorised it, who made a claim, which Nominee Repair Centre carried the work, what car work was carried on etc.
· Clear answers why The AA failed to provide any details of The Dekkra Report for over 2 years after it was requested.
I hope to receive a prompt reply.
Kindest regards
Piotr Malecki
|