I was wondering to myself today whilst stuck in traffic, not using any of the 140 turbocharged bhp available to me...
There is a definite trend for downsized petrol engines. But these seem to have a lot of the tech that gives diesels a bad name....turbos, dmfs, direct injection etc.
Then there are petrol / electric hybrids which carry a large weight penalty and I think time we show them not to be all that green once raw material sourcing for the battery is taken into account
Why doesn't anyone make a modestly petrol engined car, of (say) 80bhp with an in-parallel electric motor which provides transient (say) 50bhp power boost for just (say) 10-20 seconds at a time? On most journeys, a bit of sliproad acceleration or spooling up for an overtake is the only time one gets anywhere near full throttle.
To my mind, the electric motor would replace the starter, alternator, allow brakes to be smaller not to mention allowing a smaller overall engine & transmission. The weight penalty would surely not be too great. And instead of huge Lithium Ion cells under the seats weighing things down, the limited amount of electricity stored could be taken care of with smaller battery / flywheel / capacitors.
Are the amounts of electricity and storage technology not quite there yet to make this practical, or are there other reasons?
|