What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Fiat Qbo Wav - Unfair PCN & Appeal - skybluepink

The LA brought back a former restriction on local road ie: No right turn Fairbridge/ Hornsey Rd N19 [ recent road works & new road built] been using 3-4x a week for last few years, taking photos before sign put up then doctored time on camera for their evidence sending a locked DVD too.

Google Earth have it as viable route . Only started using when policeman told me a viable route before 1996 .Street Management ignored date instralled even when sent aFOI before Appeal.

The Independent PCN Appeal Service run by Islington employing the adjudicators.Had to complain about lack of independence to SRA .The LA ignored 2 letters from MP [ PAs?} now refusing to address injustice .

Surely sign changed since 1985 . Sign now cannot be missed.

Fiat Qbo Wav - Unfair PCN & Appeal - Bromptonaut

The question is not whether the route is viable on Google but whether the Council went through the correct process/signage. If they did then you're liable. If they really did doctor their evidence that's a serious matter. The out of London adjudicator found such a case up north and it went to Crown Court - perverting the course etc.

What do you mean about a locked DVD - presumably the CCTV of the infringement, how else would they send it?

The PCN appeal service in London (PTAS) is not run by individual boroughs. Ultimately it's under the wing of TfL but the Adjudicators themselves are appointed with the consent of the Lord Chancellor and are fiercely protective of their judicial independence.