Hi Tony, thanks for the reply.
The T&C page that I gave in my original post is the page that you are directed to when signing up for the policy, asking you to agree to those T&C. I'm not entirely sure of the relevance of the paragraph you posted, could you explain to me?
It's not unreasonable no but it's not all that common either. I've had insurance policies with 4 different companies and I've never had to give those documents, ever. I once had to give a copy of my licence as the policy holder but that was it, even though my father was on that policy, as with all of the others. So you would think that if they wanted those documents, they should make it clear from the outset but they didn't. In fact no mention was made at all during the sign up process or during my phone calls to them, the first I knew was when I got my policy pack through a few days later.
I do understand why my father should have his licence but that's outside of my control, what he does is up to him. So there's nothing I can do about it really, I can't provide them with the licence but I want to be able to keep him on the policy, mostly because it brings my premium down, which as a trainee teacher living on £6500 a year, is pretty important but also because I want him to be able to drive it at times if necessary.
If I take him off the policy, it goes up by £90 and there's also an admin fee. Then to add him back on there'll also be an admin fee. I think the admin fees are £50, taking into consideration those fees and that I'd be paying a higher premium for a while, I'd actually rather just cancel the entire policy with them and not give my money to such a ridiculous company.
So are you all saying that there's no way around it as you've not suggested one?
|
Hi vanadesse,
Okay ,the first part is that the quote you received is subject to terms and conditions .One of those conditions is the provision of a driving license copy for any person named on the policy.
Second ,other insurance companies haven't required copies of driving licenses .Sorry but you're not dealing with other insurance companies ,its not relevant ,you're dealing with e sure ,they will have there own specific requirements ,what they are asking for is not unreasonable .
Think about it ,if your father had a drink driving conviction ,it would show on his license .if the insurance company didn't know about it because they had not seen his license ,and they found out when you tried to make a claim .your insurance would be invalid .A huge problem for you ,not the insurance company .
Finally try to deal with the issue purely in monetary terms .Whats the cheapest way to get the insurance that you want ,if e sure still offer the better price ,deal with them .if not use another company .im sorry to say I don't think you're entitled to a refund of your inititial payment ,you're unable to comply with a reasonable request ,from e sure .
Regards
Tony g
|
I am just going through the same awful experience. I refuse point blank to give any insurance comany my driving license details. This is private information. The police and the Courts are the only orgInisations that can have your licence details. You have no idea what that iinformation is going to be used for and as such by you disclosing such information to unknown persons you are leaving yourselfwide open to identity theft. The insurace company has already checked your credit reference file via CDL or DL insurance services to establish your identity and credit history (especially if your paying by instalments. I intend to test the validity of these nonsense demand via the Ombudsman and if necessary the County Court. In my case they had all the relevant information and the price paid in full, then after they issued the policy started to make demands for my licence information...I sayeth unto thee..go forth and multiply! ! Oh, just in case you are wondering I have a clean licence, 22years no claim, and 44 years driving experience!! This yet another imposition put on the motoring public..stand firm and do not give in to these ridiculous demamands.
|
If the insurer makes disclosure of licence details a condition of the contract then the only choices you have is to disclose the details or find another insurer - you can't force them to insure you on your terms.
Which is same as Tony G posted.
Edited by RT on 12/05/2013 at 20:45
|
|
If you don't trust the Insurance Company and it's employees with your licence details, why trust them to pay out on any claim you may make?
Not a consistent position, is it?
|
The contract was made without any reference to supplying licence details.
This demand came withthe policy.In essence I complied fully with the terms as laid before me.After they had take my money in full our contract was made.End of...
Also it is a breach of my human rights to be forced to reveal confidential information.
Just because they are a company why should I trust them or there employees who I dont know fromAdam.QED
I agree..not a constant position.
|
Breach of your human rights?
You, sir, are a muppet
|
Thank you for your kind thoughts.However I am a muppet that fully understands his rights. Whilst you may scoff I strongly suggest you accqaint yourself with The Right of Privacy under the HRA. The Act is quite clear about being forced into disclosure of confidential information. Having spent the weekend with my niece who is a solicitor I await 9 a.m eagerly to cross swords with these empty suits...by the by..are you an insurance salesman..muppet?? Mr Stadler perhaps...Kind regards Mr Waldorf.
|
I'm more clued up than you think, many are within these boards. I just can't help but feel that you are dramatising the issue. You're not being forced, you have a choice to go elsewhere, which I for one would urge you to do.
Incidentally it's "Statler"
|
|
|
The contract was made without any reference to supplying licence details.
This demand came withthe policy.In essence I complied fully with the terms as laid before me.After they had take my money in full our contract was made.End of...
Also it is a breach of my human rights to be forced to reveal confidential information.
Just because they are a company why should I trust them or there employees who I dont know fromAdam.QED
I agree..not a constant position.
The policy is a fundamental part of the contract - and you would be allowed to examine it BEFORE entering the contract, if you'd asked.
Sounds like you got a quote without bothering to find out all the contractual details and then agreed a contract that you subsequently don't like the terms and conditions.
There's no breach of human rights, you're not being forced to do anything - you voluntarily agreed to a contract without finding out it's terms first.
Many businesses have terms and conditions which I find unacceptable- I simply dpn't use those businesses but find others whose T&C are acceptable.
|
Very few if any Insurers currently check the DVLA database when you arrange Insurance, some will check your credit file.
However 99% of Insurers will require to see a photocopy of your driving licence (Some will require all named drivers) or arrange a conference call to the DVLA to check your licence for a theft or fire claim. Many will require it for an accident.
Many companies will now days want to see your driving licence and retain a photocopy (Which incidently normally displays a "fake" watermark when photocopied) eg Banks, your employer etc.
There's little information on your driving licence that the Insurer does not already know about you apart from whether you truely have any convictions / a valid licence.
I recommend you don't get to the stage where the Insurers enforce cancellation of your policy as the repurcussions (currently) last forever
|
Normally the only people who kick up a fuss about providing information are the ones with something to hide.
Bet this applies here.
|
Hi all
Good news to report, but first I really must thank the experts on this forum who have been sosupportive and helpful, most appreciated.
The upshot of this folly is that I contacted the insurers this morning and after a brief discussion was put in touch with the complaints section. I asked for a copy of their complaint s procedure, a data subject access request (Subject to the statutory fee) and copies of all correspondence. I then told them I was contacting the FSA Ombudsman which I duly did. Story told to FSA. The FSA would contact the insurers and get back to mme.About half an hour ago I received a phone call from the insurance company. My policy has been re instated, a small adjustment in premium due to refunds, and as a token of goodwill an extra months cover for gratis. Well helpful people...I have not had to reveal my driving licence details....their now!
As stated previously 22years ncb, 44 years of unblemished driving.
The final word is that I'll be bu###rd if I'm going to pushed round by the office junior or an empty suit..the law of the land stands no matter what there worthless terms and conditions state.A contract is made by both parties agreeing. In my case the terms and conditions were applied after the contract was made and the full premium paid. If you buy insurance over the internet I suggest you do a local screen print of every page that you are filling in.If their is no request for your licence details ( copy there of) before payment is made then the insurers do not have a porcelain receptacle to urinate in..as the man said."I love it when a plan comes together". Kind rgds.I
|
Well the OP seems to have got what he wanted for now but I'm afraid the 'right to privacy' argument is a red herring.
The 'Human Rights' angle on privacy rests on Article 8, respect for privatre and family life. Likle most rights under the act/Convention the rights in article 8 are not absolute; they have to be balanced against other rights and responsibilities.
Most HRA issues arise with government although Article 8 has been used to justify the privacy rights of so called celebrities where the press is publishing what are usually salacious details of their personal lives. In these cases the right ot privacy works in tandem with the rights to freedom of expression under article 10. A court, deciding whether to injunct such publication must use the FACTS of the case to balance on right against the other. A politician's Financial shenanigans might be more likley to warrant publications than some t*rt's revelation of his performance under the duvet.
It's very difficult to see why, applying a similar test it would not be proportionate to the needs of a motor insurance contract to see the licenses of the insured. There are certainly commercial outfits that with permission and for a fee will check employee's details against DVLA records. No disclose, no drive and possibly no job.
What on earth does the OP think is 'personal' about his DVLA record (age; classiifcations on license; points on license) that he has not already disclosed on the proposal?
|
The FSA you say?
Are you sure of that? All completed today was this or am I missing something?
|
Indeed. Something fishy here: the FSA was replaced on 1 April 2013 by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
|
Indeed. Something fishy here: the FSA was replaced on 1 April 2013 by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
I'm glad it wasn't just me then. Not to mention the 'old' FSA would not have had an action as quick as one working day and act as a telephone intermediary.
I call 'Bluff'
|
Indeed. Something fishy here: the FSA was replaced on 1 April 2013 by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
I suspect reference to FSA is a mistake and that it was the Financial Services Ombudsman the OP consulted.
|
I've been driving since the 70's and have never been asked for a copy of my driving licence, anyone that tells you 99% of companies want to see it is mis-informed. I have though been asked for a copy by a previous motorcycle insurer and did send them it with the proviso that they returned it to me (without copying it) in a prepaid envelope that I kindly provided, in hindsight I would not do so again.
I do recommend that you safeguard important data such as your birthdate, NI number, phone reference number etc, never use use any personal data on sites like facebook and always use modified information you can trace if there is a security breach.
Bonzomatic has been most sensible, there is so much fraud around that we must all be on our guard constantly, dishonest people do work for reputable companies as well as honest ones, Indian call centres area prime example of criminal activity.
Take care,
Frost
|
I've been driving since the 70's and have never been asked for a copy of my driving licence, anyone that tells you 99% of companies want to see it is mis-informed. I have though been asked for a copy by a previous motorcycle insurer and did send them it with the proviso that they returned it to me (without copying it) in a prepaid envelope that I kindly provided, in hindsight I would not do so again.
I do recommend that you safeguard important data such as your birthdate, NI number, phone reference number etc, never use use any personal data on sites like facebook and always use modified information you can trace if there is a security breach.
Bonzomatic has been most sensible, there is so much fraud around that we must all be on our guard constantly, dishonest people do work for reputable companies as well as honest ones, Indian call centres area prime example of criminal activity.
Take care,
Frost
Two seperate issues here; we're not talking about not divulging personal info to the interweb, this is about providing licence info to an insurance company (of which I'm still unsure what personal information it contains).
Bozomatic stats that the FSA (a defunct organisation) intervened to override a request for such information by an insurance company based on the HRA, all in a day.
Don't confuse the issue.
|
1. What happened to the word "please"?
2. I was not trying to confuse the issue.
3. Divulging any information to any service or company opens you up to fraud or criminal activity, so be very careful.
4.The less documentation you spread around the safer you will be.
5. Driving licenses are very valuable items to criminals, you should not let anyone have a copy.
Thank you, have a nice day
Frost
|
1. What happened to the word "please"?
2. I was not trying to confuse the issue.
3. Divulging any information to any service or company opens you up to fraud or criminal activity, so be very careful.
4.The less documentation you spread around the safer you will be.
5. Driving licenses are very valuable items to criminals, you should not let anyone have a copy.
Thank you, have a nice day
Frost
Sorry about that, didn't intend to cause offence but on review I can see how my post seemed blunt.
However the crux remains. You appear to be mixing the issues here and therefore adding confusion. I do not consider sharing information with an insurance outfit on par with posting it online (which you introduced).
The point about the FSA remains the same, and I note Bozomatic has not returned since his post.
|
"I've been driving since the 70's and have never been asked for a copy of my driving licence, anyone that tells you 99% of companies want to see it is mis-informed. I have though been asked for a copy by a previous motorcycle insurer and did send them it with the proviso that they returned it to me (without copying it) in a prepaid envelope that I kindly provided, in hindsight I would not do so again.
I do recommend that you safeguard important data such as your birthdate, NI number, phone reference number etc, never use use any personal data on sites like facebook and always use modified information you can trace if there is a security breach.
Bonzomatic has been most sensible, there is so much fraud around that we must all be on our guard constantly, dishonest people do work for reputable companies as well as honest ones, Indian call centres area prime example of criminal activity.
Take care,
Frost"
I've worked in the industry for more than two decades and can guarantee you that 99% of Insurers will insist on seeing a photocopy of a driving licence or possibly a conference call to the DVLA before they pay a Theft or Fire claim.
Anyone that tells you 99% of companies DON'T want to see it is mis-informed...
|
I only deal with a single insurer per year, but never been asked for a copy of my licence, even after a claim - not that I'd find it an issue if it was one of the terms of the contract.
Perversely I often get asked to see my driving licence for general id purposes - despite it being a 40-year-old faded green licence with no picture!
|
I've worked in the industry for more than two decades and can guarantee you that 99% of Insurers will insist on seeing a photocopy of a driving licence or possibly a conference call to the DVLA before they pay a Theft or Fire claim.
Anyone that tells you 99% of companies DON'T want to see it is mis-informed...
Two different scenarios in play.
No reason to doubt that insurers would want licences in case of a claim, indded I'd be amazed if anything else happened.
In the OP's case and that which follows it seems insurers are wanting licence details at policy inception or renewal.
Not surprised that might start to happen. If insurers have got burned fingers paying third party claims from unlicensed drivers it makes sense to ask for details at outset. That seems to me to be proportionate use of data. I'm surprised they're not able to make such checks on line with DVLA. I've had a little involvement with managing 'driving at work' risk and was approached by companies offering to confirm employee's licence categories and points.
|
- Theft & Fire claims are blighted by very high amounts of fraudulent claims so tend to trigger extra investigation. Requesting a copy DL has been standard for these claims for many many years. I even seen a few cases where people have crudely faked the copies and been caugh
- The only company I've ever known check with the DVLA at inception is Chaucer (I don't deal with them now days so not sure if they still do). I spoke to their underwriter about this and he explained the cost per client was relatively high, as a company it would cost them circa £250k a year (The DVLA charge per enquiry and the fee the DVLA charge for the data link) and however he mentioned they were discovering enough undisclosed convictions to generate £400k so they were happy.
- I believe they had an extra line or two added to the proposal forms about Data Protection (In addition to the standard DP notices)and them checking DVLA
- It did tend to upset a lot of customers as many resent receiving a letter advising them they need to send X amount extra including an admin fee.
- Insurers tend to work at the speed of continental drift and don't like change. They also worry that if they work in a different way to other Insurers they will lose customers due to customers going to a company that has not adopted whatever they fangled idea.
- You also have the issue of Utmost Good Faith on which Insurance was founded and most Insurers still believe in. They rely on clients to declare the correct information at inception, the checking of licences at claim stage is regarded as the customer proving the claim / the Insurer validating it.
- Having said that, Insurers are slowly embracing new technologies with many now checking for claims at inception stage against C.U.E and many checking credit files, some even check against the Hunter database at inception. I have no doubt that in the future the vast majority of Insurers will pay the DVLA fees and start checking licences at inception.
- There are a few Insurers that require a copy of DL at inception eg the esure group of companies do but also clearly advise of this http://www.esurebroker.com/faqs/proof_of_driving_licence (I've heard of many many people having their policies cancelled by them for this reason.
Edited by dacouch on 16/05/2013 at 19:39
|
Sorry about bullet points, I lost my connection when I pressed post, refreshed and then clicked post and they appeared.
Changes the context of my post completely!
|
Here is a slight variation on what has been posted previously:
- I call for an insurance quote, answer their questions, receive a price, and make a payment.
- My insurance documents are received through the post.
- Two weeks after my initial call, I receive another letter requested a copy of my driving licence.
- I contact the insurance company and indicate that I am reluctant to provide a copy of my driving licence, as it it a government issued photo identification document, which I never allow to be copied.
- I ask what the requirement is for the insurance company to hold a copy of my licence, and am told that in the event of an accident the insurance company would have all the relevant details to hand.
- I offer to present my original (not photocopied) driving licence to any of the insurance company's offices where their personnel have satisfy themselves as to its authenticity, and, make a note of any relevant details the insurance company may require.
- The is unacceptable to the insurance company agent, the actual insurance company is headquartered outside of the EU.
- I ask how they would intend to store any copy of my licence, and who would have access to it. To which I am informed that it would be scanned and stored digitally (electronically) and that any representative and/or agent would have access to the document.
For me, there remain 6 key issues with what has transpired:
- I was not informed in advance that the insurance company would require a copy of my driving licence.
- The insurance company has no reason nor standing to demand to hold a copy of a government issued photo identifiation document, as this was not agreed as part of any contract.
- There is no statutatory legal requirement for an insurance company to hold a copy of customer's driving licence.
- I have no offers nor guarantees that once any supplied copy is digitally scanned and archived that this information will not be accessible from outside the EU, which will have differing data handling conditions.
- At the end of the inurance period, unless renewed, the insurance company would no longer have a requirement to hold a copy of a driving licence. What would be there disposal verification procedures.
- The offer to present the original driving licence to them in peron has been made, yet why does this not satisfy their information requirements.
Essentially, once a government issued photo identification document is being digitally held, the owner of the data (the driving licence holder) has effectively lost all control of where this information may end up and by whom it may be accessed.
It is not even a question it being unable to be tracked, it is a question that insurance companies want your information, and are not held accountable as to whether they actually need it; how they will store it; what will it be used for, and by whom.
|
|
|
|
|
|