Interesting question. Did the OP mention the Wty and History at time of purchase? Was it recorded as being present when the car was offered for sale? Was the sale conditional on the presence of these items? Did you write a note on the sales documents (to that effect) when you signed for the vehicle?
My opinion is that if the answer is no,no and no and given the car is as you admit absolutely fine, then I would have said nope. You have no grounds to reject. Arguably the vendor could say he was offering the vehicle at that advantageous price specifically as he didn't have the documentation.
Given that A you were offered a set deal for a set price. You accepted same and paid under those terms.
Invitation to Treat ie Offer> Acceptance> Remuneration> Transfer of Goods/Title.
If as I suggest, NOW you remember these items and seek to alter the terms of the completed deal then I would have said your out of luck.
I would think the Sale of Goods Act (to which you refer) is only meant to be there as protection against sub standard goods and as you admit the goods ie the vehicle is fine. Not to slew the terms of a completed transaction more into your favour.
My 2p though I may be completely wrong. I'd love to find out how this issue resolves itself or if any legal beagles are reading it.
Practically I would have thought that Hyundai would be able to supply all of that stuff centrally anyway.
Edited by Ethan Edwards on 05/09/2011 at 17:48
|