I've paid a deposit and signed for an order for a new 49K BMW on the basis of a very generous trade-in valuation of my 18 month old option loaded Q7. The paperwork has been signed by me and the dealer sales manager but I have a suspicion in the back of my mind that they may have made a mistake valuing my car. Perhaps by 8 or 9K.
I was at the dealership for over 2 hours so things weren't rushed. The Salesman and the Sales Manager were both involved so they should know what they are doing but I wondered what my rights were to insist on the deal going ahead.
Part of the sales pitch was that my trade-in was guaranteed and that they would stand by it irrespective to what happens in the car market for the 8 weeks it takes for my new car to arrive.
I asked Honest John who I greatly respect and he very kindly responded to say that the dealer can cancel the contract on the basis of the contract being 'unfair'. This makes me think further. According the the Consumer Direct website ...
Terms in consumer contracts that set the price or define the product or service being supplied are 'core terms' of the contract and are exempt from the test of fairness as long as they meet the plain language requirement.
So is it really so easy for the dealer to just say sorry mate we made a mistake off you go? What if it were the other way around and I accepted 8K less than I should have?
I do want the car and may negotiate 50:50 but thought it would be good to have the thoughts of others.
Anyone had this happen to them?
Any legal eagles?
|