Hi, I need some advice.. I recently purchased a second hand car that apparently had a valid MOT certificate and "drives like new" and also had "remote central locking".
When I handed the money to the seller, he then told me... "the front steering brushes/bushels (??) need replaced and would cost about £30", he also told me to get the wheels balanced.
When I got the car home I couldn't operate the central locking as the fob doesn't work (new fob from Mercedes = £219).
Then I took it to a mechanic to sort out the front bushes. He told me that the brushes were fine but some steering arm needs replaced (cost £80) and that there's no way that the car would have passed its MOT (dated only 6 weeks ago) with this fault. He also noticed the rear tyres have been turned around so that they look healthy, but the insides (which was the outsides) are near bald!! Finally the brake pads and disc are so worn that again it would have been an MOT fail.
I have gone back to the seller with this news and he claims that when he got the car he took the MOT as gospel... however, he has ended up selling me a car that is currently unroadworthy!!
I paid over £5k for this car so I am keen to know what my rights are as a consumer. Should he have sold me a car in this state... and by claiming he didn't know about these faults meant that he is not liable. And if the MOT guys claim that the car was fine when they did the MOT 6 weeks ago, should I suspect that the guy who sold me the car has altered it before he has sold it onto me (although I appreciate that may be difficult to prove)
Please help :(
|