What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
tinyurl.com/42mpxw


>>The truth is that the motor industry is in freefall. In the UK, between September 2007 and September 2008, new numberplate registrations fell by 26%. In the US, the market is vanishing; manufacturers are looking to George Bush for a $25bn (£14.25bn) bailout. In Japan, Toyota's September sales fell from 213,042 in 2007 to 144,260 this year. China's car sales, after months of rapid growth, have slumped, and in Brazil, Mexico, France, Germany and India sales also fell: there is almost no one in the world, it seems, who feels that this is the right moment to buy a new car.

To make matters worse, the financial turbulence comes just as restrictions on carbon emissions are finally catching up with car makers. Of all industries, the car sector has been the slackest at reducing its CO2 levels. Attempts at self-regulation have failed and now the authorities are stepping in; the European Commission will shortly ratify new targets that will require car manufacturers to reduce emissions to an average of 130g per km. <<

This will be punitive for most car owners in the UK as no doubt it will result in higher VED for anyone with a car over 130gm per km.

Problem is, these small cars do not have the ability to carry large numbers let alone things like suitcases when off to the airport, a trip of goods back from a DIY shed or a bike or surfboard?


130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - midlifecrisis
My Pug coupe has a C02 rating of 219g/kg. I do have serious concerns about the coming couple of years. This shower will have to recoup all those bankers billions somehow.

I Should change now before my car becomes unsaleable, but that would involve spending thousands to save a few hundred a year.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - Alanovich
Not if you change to something of the same value as the car you already own, only with lower emissions. This is what I did a few months ago and I've ended up with a car I prefer to that which it replaced, which is also much cheaper to run with a year's warranty on it. Nice. No need to spend extra money when you change, it's not compulsory!
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - TheOilBurner
This is what happens when know nothing politicians in their ivory towers try to change how we plebs live.

We've considered swapping our Zafira 2.2 auto with a Meriva 1.7 CDTI manual.

3 problem areas:

1) Meriva is just not big enough, we're already thinking about buying a roof box for the Zafira for family holidays.

2) Even the 1.7 CDTI is still 139g/km and "way over" the average 130 the EU is aiming for.

3) We want an autobox, the flexibility to use 7 seats when we go out with the family, the extra equipment and safety from the bigger car and the Meriva isn't even a very good car...

So what do we do? I have no idea.

130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
This is what happens when know nothing politicians in their ivory towers try to change
how we plebs live.
We've considered swapping our Zafira 2.2 auto with a Meriva 1.7 CDTI manual.


A friend of mine moved down from a Zaf to a meriva last year and is now considering going back up to a Zaf. She has two teenager sons and an elderly Mum who used to be able to slide in and out of the Zaf passenger seat but who now has trouble getting in and out of the Meriva.

They also find the Meriva has alot less poke on the roads, especially on the motorway, which she finds unnerving.

130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - TheOilBurner
That's it exactly Tawse, I wonder how much "upsizing" we'll see in the next couple of years as people realise they prefer the higher tax (let's face not that much more anyway) and running costs to having a car which just doesn't meet their needs.

Edited by TheOilBurner on 16/10/2008 at 17:06

130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
That's it exactly Tawse I wonder how much "upsizing" we'll see in the next couple
of years as people realise they prefer the higher tax (let's face not that much
more anyway) and running costs to having a car which just doesn't meet their needs.


I am going to take a look at the new Jazz in the next week - think my local Honda dealer has it on show from Saturday - to see if I can fit in it but... for comfortable, health and safety reasons I am probably going to bite the VED increases on the head and go for a Verso or a CRV.

I was amazed a few months back when an osteopath told me that I was stopping as a result of using a car - Fiat Brava - that was too small for me and that this was causing longer-term health problems. Sorry, going off-topic.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - L'escargot
Until such time as VED becomes a major percentage of my total motoring costs I'm not going to worry about it. There are loads of ways in which people could, if necessary, economise to compensate for an increase in VED. The trouble is that most people wouldn't even consider a lower standard of living to that which they have at present.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
My car is rated at 114 I believe although I didnt change to it for VED reasons, Im glad I did change as it has meant I am about as cushioned against the anti-car lobby and its policies as I can be.

If you have a big car, you choose to, you pay for it. I know a family of four who made do with a 1980 Mini Mayfair, including holidays to France and every possible journey they needed to do, it was their only car for 15 years. Not cant, its wont.

Its not that people cant cope, they just dont want to have to change their priorities when buying a car. If you want a big 4x4 or MPV, it will cost more as will an automatic, thats the way it is.

But as has been said, why people get their knickers in a knot about VED is beyond me - forgetting my car as it is unreasonably cheap to run, say my mums Hyundai Coupe V6 - Her VED will eventually be £430 a year - sounds big BUT her fuel bill is £2200 a year - that is where the saving could be made by changing car, even if it was still high VED banding.

Even at £430 a year, thats only £35 a month - less than some people spend on say a SKY TV subscription. Get some perspective.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - cheddar
>>So what do we do? I have no idea.>>

By a pre March 2001 V12 S-Class, pay £185 VED and give the proverbial two fingers to Brown and Darling.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - Alanovich
>>So what do we do? I have no idea.>>
By a pre March 2001 V12 S-Class pay £185 VED and give the proverbial two
fingers to Brown and Darling.

Erm, and give them an awful lot of money in fuel duty at the same time. That approach makes absolutley no sense to me.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - cheddar
Erm and give them an awful lot of money in fuel duty at the same
time. That approach makes absolutley no sense to me.


The thread is about VED not fuel duty though I was being a little tounge in cheek.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - rtj70
"Even at £430 a year, thats only £35 a month - less than some people spend on say a SKY TV subscription. Get some perspective. "

Exactly. I am amazed when people try to save a few tens of pounds a year on VED by buying a new car costing them thousands to change. As you say above you can save a lot by using less fuel.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - TheOilBurner
"I know a family of four who made do with a 1980 Mini Mayfair"

Maybe you're right and maybe would all could make do with less.

With a Corsa or Fiesta many trips that results in buying something or going on holiday would need a trailer or paying for deliveries. Not always practical and certainly not the norm, but could it be done? I guess so.

But try getting 2 adults, 2 kids and a medium to large sized dog in a Fiesta! You might fit, but forget about taking _anything_ with you!
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
>>But try getting 2 adults, 2 kids and a medium to large sized dog in a Fiesta! You might fit, but forget about taking _anything_ with you!<<

The point there is simple though - have as many kids as you can afford ( seems the people with the least money seem to multiply well beyond their means - a condom is cheaper than a baby too ) and a dog is a luxury - if you can afford vets bills, food and all associated gear that goes with having a pet, you also commit to having a vehicle large enough to carry them.

I know a mum who can carry all her baby gear, her stuff and her partners stuff for a holiday in a Ford Ka. Its amazing how much stuff will fit in certain small cars if you package it right.

These small estates from Renault, Peugeot and Skoda arent bad ideas either, not to mention some of the utility MPVs which seem to be good value.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - TheOilBurner
Stu, I think you may be missing the point. I doubt few people will lie on their death bed and say "I'm glad we didn't have more than one kid or that dog we always wanted and saved a packet on VED"... ;-)

However this is the problem as I see it, people having kids and dogs and what not expect life to be more expensive, and that's fine. But if politicians make cars *too* expensive to run for people like that then that isn't fine. £400 or so in VED hasn't got to that point yet, but if these loons want to make 130g/km, then 100g/km and then even less the norm and they intend to push up VED and other taxes to silly amounts (4 figures+) to force that to happen, then ordinary people who made sane choices about their lifestyles one day suddenly find themselves seriously out of pocket with few or no options the next.

See the difference? I don't think anyone can seriously suggest that a family of four + a dog is priced off the road just yet, but ideas are going round the politicians heads...
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - NowWheels
ith a Corsa or Fiesta many trips that results in buying something or going on holiday
would need a trailer or paying for deliveries. Not always practical and certainly not
the norm, but could it be done? I guess so.


My family did exactly that in the 79s, changing down from a Cortina to a Chevette. The Chevette+trailer shifted big stuff when needed, and the car was fine for daily use.
But try getting 2 adults, 2 kids and a medium to large sized dog in a Fiesta!
You might fit, but forget about taking _anything_ with you!


Nonsense. My family at the time consisted of two parents, two teenagers and one large dog, and we all fitted. Dog sat in the back seat between us two; in those days there were no rear seat belts, but nowadays the dog would wear a safety harness, as my open dog does now. As to luggage, that was easy: don't use suitcases. Pack clothes is squashy bags, and there was plenty of room for everything in the Chevette's tiny boot for long weekends, and for summer holidays extra clothing went in the dinghy we towed behind the car.

It all worked, and the petrol savings paid for more holiday treats. Rear legroom was cramped, but we coped with that by stopping every hour. My job was to research interesting places to stop, and our journeys were so much more fun that I was very miffed when times got better my dad changed the Chevette for another Cortina.

The notion that a family of 4 "needs" a large estate or an MPV is nonsense. Sure, it's more comfortable that way, but the little car is perfectly doable.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - FotheringtonThomas
(..) just as restrictions on carbon emissions are finally catching up with car makers.
Of all industries the car sector has been the slackest at reducing its CO2 levels.
Attempts at self-regulation have failed and now the authorities
are stepping in; the European Commission will shortly ratify new targets that will
require car manufacturers to reduce emissions to an average of 130g per km.


Hence my thought posted as a request for a reference a while ago - from the BBC:

"The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) said a cut in greenhouse gas emissions of at least 80% by 2050 should include international aviation and shipping.
It said other industries would have to make up any shortfall in those areas."

So. Personal transport is the source of approximately 15% of total UK carbon emissions, with private vehicles contributing over 11% (total UK carbon emissions) on their own. I suspect we'll begin to feel the pinch a bit more.

Edit: Source for figures: ONS.

Edited by FotheringtonThomas on 16/10/2008 at 17:03

130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - madf
Next year when big car prices have fallen even further due to recession I am going to buy a pre 2002/pre new VED regs CDI or TD Mercedes...

I reckon I will be able to buy one under 90k miles, Full MBSH for under £4k.. - all toys/leather, no rust etc etc...

The Yaris is 120 gms so it's £35 VED.. and cheap to run and sevice. SWMBO's 15 years old 106 will hav eto go..(but don't tell her)
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - the swiss tony
<< I am going to buy a pre 2002/pre new VED regs CDI or TD Mercedes... ll toys/leather, no rust etc etc... >>

Hmmmm do a google ... you will find 99-03 Mercs rust as you look at them... go for older or newer - but also be careful with CDI's - misfueling as on other threads, and im not sure the V6 is a good engine even without misfueling - ive seen a lot in bits!
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - Westpig
I can't believe that some people will lose 3 or 4 grand minimum on swapping newish cars around to save 3 or 4 hundred pounds a year on their Road Fund Licence..or..

make do with something they don't really want or doesn't fit their needs properly

the worst case scenario is only about £25 per month difference in extra funds in your budget to pay for more car tax

look at how much a month goes on depreciation, many hundreds normally

i understand that some people are running cars on quite tight budgets, but in reality the depreciation recently on larger engined models, means it often isn't economic to sell them, because the smaller engine ones are now in demand... best to wait until a natural change were due and think sensibly then

e.g. family on tight budget, not intending to do silly mileage. what to buy? 2.0 petrol Mondeo type car could well be a reasonable bargain compared to say 1.6 diesel Focus type car, (diesel always having had a premium price anyway..and more so nowadays with people downsizing and wanting lower car tax brackets) so you'd probably get noticeably newer, larger, probably more simplistic (known potential for some diesels to cost a few bob to put right when they go wrong), maybe not so stressed an engine e.g. difference between a smaller fully laden car and a larger engined one...down side would be the car tax and fuel, but when you even them all out (servicing and putting right diesel problems if/when you have them) i wouldn't imagine the difference would be all that great, although i'd accept re-sale would be a hit, so it would have to be a long term game
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
I see the Govt has just signed us up to even tougher CO2 regs - what now for VED?
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - retgwte
time for a diesel panda estate version then
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - Alby Back
time for a diesel panda estate version then



That'd be one to drop in the conversation at the High school re-union eh ?

" Yes, life has been good to me, three kids, angel of a wife and this year I treated myself to a diesel Panda estate y'know......"
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - doctorchris
I've done, more or less, what this post suggests.
Most of family left home or have own cars. Wife has a Honda Jazz which will actually swallow huge items when need arises.
3 years ago I bought a Fiat Panda 4x4 when all around me were buying Mercs and Jags and I'm about to "upgrade" to the diesel version of the Panda 4x4 (which was the engine I really wanted in the first place but it's only just become available).
I haven't enjoyed driving as much for years as I have recently. Mind, I rarely need to use a motorway which helps.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - FotheringtonThomas
See earlier post. It'll get worse. If air/sea transport emissions can't be reduced by a very great deal, then change will happen somewhere else - home energy efficiency and cars could well be in the sights. I can imagine there being an absolute cap on CO2 emissions at some time. Still, perhaps some technical advance in powering cars (or even price-driven change) will come about.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
See earlier post. It'll get worse. If air/sea transport emissions can't be reduced by a
very great deal then change will happen somewhere else - home energy efficiency and cars
could well be in the sights. I can imagine there being an absolute cap on
CO2 emissions at some time. Still perhaps some technical advance in powering cars (or even
price-driven change) will come about.


I think CO2 taxes will be charged on houses sooner than later which, for much of Britain's soddy built housing, will be a money-spinner for the UK. Many older houses are simple one brick thick construction which means it is night impossible to insulate the walls and Victorian and Edwardian houses with high ceilings are nothing more than chimneys. Having said that, the new build I am renting at the moment has ceilings so low I feel as if I am going to bang my head on them. I am 6' 2" btw.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
Im not sure they could target houses too much, atleast not for a while as the economy will take a while to right itself and people struggle to pay household bills as it is, plus how would you measure emissions from a house accurately? Its not like a car which is a single entity, nor does it have an exhaust pipe!
I think that the CO2 wont be taxed directly but through energy bills, that would seem the only sensible way with discounts if the supplier gets a certain percentage of energy from a renewable source or low CO2.

I dont think teh economy can take much more at the moment, people at the bottom of the ladder dont have enough money to live as it is, let alone facing more taxes on house emissions, rubbish collection and higher energy bills.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
Im not sure they could target houses too much atleast not for a while as
the economy will take a while to right itself and people struggle to pay household
bills as it is plus how would you measure emissions from a house accurately? Its
not like a car which is a single entity nor does it have an exhaust
pipe!


Sorry, I was being flippant by using CO2 for houses. What I meant to say is each house being taxed on its energy efficiency rating which, of course, all houses now have to state when being sold since the introduction of HIPs.

It is a first step for a Govt to rate all houses and then the next logical step is to tax them on that rating. Knowing this Govt it will be in addition to any Council Tax also. Btw, UK houses have some of the most inferior build qualities of any new builds in Europe or the US.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - boxsterboy
Of course one of the reasons why the government are increasing VED for higher 'poluting' cars is because families don't really have an alternative. We are a family of 5+ and so need a large car. If a realistic alternative was available the government would not be increasing the tax.

It's their monopoly abuse of a captive market.

Edited by boxsterboy on 16/10/2008 at 22:20

130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
Me and the misses reasoned that since we do need two cars as we both work nowhere near eachother, when we have kids, we would simply use two cars on the rare occasion that we needed to transport more than one car could take, which if we have two kids, would be about three or four times a year.

It saves having one large vehicle which for the most part would be under utilised.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - midlifecrisis
I had a Peugeot 107 whilst my car was in for tyre valve replacement. Apart for suffering terminal embarrassment (it was a sport, white with twin red 'go faster stripes over the roof) it certainly wasn't something that was going to replace a family car. It took a couple of hours to get my hearing back after a motorway run.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
The 107 is a poorly packaged car though with more thought on style than practicality.

I dont have any refinement issues with my Daihatsu but cant comment on the 107 an dits clones. Maybe its what one gets used to. I find the misses Picanto much less refined than my car, although that said, mine does have a vocal engine under hard accelaration,, I just dont mind the sound ( throbby 3-cyl ).

The difference between the Charade and other city cars is quite large in terms of interior space, to such an extent that the misses wants to get a Charade when she has a baby as no other city car offers that kind of space inside.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - ijws15
Problem is these small cars do not have the ability to carry large numbers let
alone things like suitcases when off to the airport a trip of goods back from
a DIY shed or a bike or surfboard?


My 130g car swallows what we used to put in the Honda Tourer when we go on holiday to France, cruises happily at a true 70mph, will swallow a 900x1200 sheet of plasterboard back seats down and 4 adults back sets up (as the Honda), don't recall when I last had five in a car but then I found out what was causing the arrival of children and put a stop to it!

It is not especially small, about 8" shorter than the Honda.

Skoda Octavia 1.9!

130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - Pendlebury
>>I don't think the economy can take much more at the moment,<<

I agree with you Stu but I also think the economy is in for much more of hammering yet. People talk about a credit crunch. What we have actually had is a liquidity crunch. Banks that have used our money to gamble, lost and now have no or little liquidity. The CREDIT crunch is only just starting. You will see allot less financing available as the banks will now over-react to protect themselves and re-capitalise. We are already seeing it with Northern Rock. It will now just get a whole lot worse as Joe Public will not be able to get financing or if they can it will be very expensive relative to the last 10 years. This will now drive a recession with even more reductions in house and car sales.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - gmac
Why stop at 130g ? Don't base anything on what a politician says.
Fact is the Governments of Europe are not helping the situation. Until there is a common goal agreed to by a majority of countries, the manufacturers do not know which way to jump.
Try selling a car in Spain which is more than 120g.

People, as we have seen on here, are chopping in perfectly good 3, 4, 5 year old cars and down sizing to save two tanks worth of fuel in road tax.

I will be sticking with my current car until a clear policy is in place which I can assess and work out what provides me with the most cost effective way to transport my family around. I'm not going for the kneejerk reaction.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
We are entering the same type of deflationary environment that Japan entered in 1991 and which, 17 years, later, they are not out of yet. House prices have fallen by 90% on average in that time and the cost of all 'big ticket' items such as boats, bikes, electronic goods and, of course, cars has also fallen dramatically.

We are going to see the self same thing but perhaps more so because our credit debt binge has been hugely greater and assets across the board are going to fall in value in ways that will shock most of us. They will be talking about this economic crisis long after most off us are dead and gone just in the same way as we talk about 1929 and the Great Depression.

Japan is a small over-crowded island with twice the population of the UK - house prices fell 90% there. It is going to happen here also. What hope for cars!
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
Those who properly downsize while still suiting their needs are trying to get ahead of the game, not to try and save a few quid on VED. Look ahead, which few seem to have done up to this point and project how much more expensive cars will be.

I downsized not because its a bit expensive now, but because in 5 years time, I think it could well be prohibitive to run a large car and I dont want to be one of the predictable whining bunch who say they didnt know, its so unfair.

The policy IS clear - big cars will be targeted as the enviromental issues continue to be persued - short of the planet suddenly showing signs of recovery from whatever it is they think is going wrong, that is the way it is going and its a case of whether or not the individual can afford to be shortsighted.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
Those who properly downsize while still suiting their needs are trying to get ahead of
the game not to try and save a few quid on VED. Look ahead which
few seem to have done up to this point and project how much more expensive
cars will be.
I downsized not because its a bit expensive now but because in 5 years time
I think it could well be prohibitive to run a large car and I dont
want to be one of the predictable whining bunch who say they didnt know its
so unfair.


Exactly. My Fiat Brava died in June after 10 years and I hope that my next car will last 10 years. It was going to be a CRV a year ago when I began looking but all this environmental change has made me stop and think. I am not convinced that a smaller car will fit my needs in terms of what I carry and my height but, if one did, then I probably would have bought one by now because of where I can foresee the costs of motoring going in the next 5 to 10 years.

Having said that, was just coming home from the pub with a mate and we had a Jazz in front of us and it just looked tiny compared to the other cars in front of and passing it - I don't think the car makers have got it right yet by any means in terms of lower CO2, higher MPG and practical space. Maybe these next generation cars need to have engines no longer capable of doing 100 MPH plus as that is just a waste of development and resources these days.

130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
It is possible to package a small car to be spacious - my Charade is certainly small, but rear legroom is comparable to my dads Astra as is space in general, aside from the boot although that is a decent size for a small car.
The clue is the stupid amount of interior trim that cars seem to have these days - the Kia Picanto looses nearly two feet of boot width to plastic trim which serves no practical purpose. I love cars like the Fiat Doblo which offer great space for low price and some models offer good emissions and economy.

I was talking to a customer with an Audi Q7 - by rights an enormous vehicle, but strangely terrible use of space at the expense of cabin design.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - bazza
Interesting thread this... We downsized to a Note a year ago and have been very satisfied (it's an SE, so no tyre size problems on it). It's very spacious in the back with the sliding rear seat and to be honest, my 2 teenage kids love it for the legroom. Average 47mpg on petrol. In fact, it is perfectly capable of replacing the Octavia as our main family car, except perhaps for the annual French holiday - although a large roofbox would sort that.
A work colleague has recently been driving a 1.2 Corsa courtesy car and has commented on the lack of space compared to her 1.1 Panda - suprising given the external size of the Corsa these days.
I hope we see a move away from increasing size and weight to lighter, smaller, more efficient designs such as the Panda and Charade, Sirion etc. I see that the new Insignia is larger (if that's possible) than the outgoing Vectra and even the new Mondeo! Wrong car at the wrong time IMO. Can't these manufacturers see the writing on the wall, or are they like a large superertanker and difficult to make changes in direction?
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
>> Can't these manufacturers see the writing on
the wall or are they like a large superertanker and difficult to make changes in
direction?

>>

Look how many makes charge 2K for a non updateable sat-nav when you can buy such a device for 100 quid. Ipod connectors are still unavailble on many makes or if available they cost a few hundred pounds for something that effectively costs pence. Bill Gates was right about the motor industry.

I think cars have got heavier re NCAP ratings - 5 stars is a must today.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - Pendlebury
>>We are entering the same type of deflationary environment that Japan entered in 1991 and which, 17 years, later, they are not out of yet. <<

I am not sure we are entering a deflationary period - all the signs are that we have quite strong inflation. The problem we will have as a country is that we have nothing to sell any more to help us out of this mess. As a nation our wealth is primarily dependent upon the finance sector and now this is up the creek without a paddle we will struggle much more than most other countries. Even the USA has a huge and very high tech manufacturing base, as does Germany, France, Japan etc. We have run out of North Sea oil, the finance sector is broken - and is being rescued by Spain, the French and Germans own our energy supplies, we sold our Nuclear energy capability to the Japanese and Americans, any car factories we have are owned by the Germans, Japanese and French and what gas we do need also comes from Russia and Norway. Singapore also realised along time ago that it had no natural resources and realised that it's people would be the differentiator. They have a very highly educated population with companies lining up to build factories there.
People keep thinking the worst is over but I'm afraid it is only just starting. As people have reported we have spent £500Bn just to stop the rot and stand still.

On the subject of downsizing though I am in favour of pushing the car makers to reduce emissions. They can do it with a bit of pressure. Cars today must be 70% more fuel efficient than 20-30 years ago and with a bit more pressure the Japs and Germans will do it again for us. We can't because we have no factories or scientists (oustide of RR and BAE).
Also cars are getting bigger so downsizing to a Jazz/Note is not really that uncomfortable because these are fairly big cars in reality.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - gmac
The policy IS clear - big cars will be targeted as the enviromental issues continue
to be persued...


Only in the UK, possibly. Car manufacturers have to cater for more than one market when designing and building a new model. Should one market put too many draconian measures on a manufacturer or manufacturers then they will simply pull out of that market.
Some European Governments have yet to decide how they are going to implement or even IF they are going to implement taxation by exhaust emissions.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - midlifecrisis
During my days in the mob on fishery protection duties, the French and Spanish completely ignored all the rules then, so I don't see them doing it now.

They have a habit of signing agreements, smiling nicely and ignoring anything that will hurt their own national interests. . (Which isn't necessarily a bad thing)
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - tawse
During my days in the mob on fishery protection duties the French and Spanish completely
ignored all the rules then so I don't see them doing it now.
They have a habit of signing agreements smiling nicely and ignoring anything that will hurt
their own national interests. . (Which isn't necessarily a bad thing)


This has long be the problem with the EU - they bring in a 1001 new rules each year and the only country that is stupid enough to enforce them is the UK with our a nally obsessed Civil Service control freakdom. The resto f the EU, most notably the Italians, Greeks and Spanish, just ignore them.

A good example of this is when, a few years back, they decided that all EU bridges had to be reinforced to take bigger juggernaunts. Us mugs did it at a huge expense, other countries either did not bother or are, years after the deadline, still getting round to doing it... and certain Med EU countires just pocketed big wads of EU grants to do it but, um, the money never got as far as the bridges.

The only country with a more a nal Civil Service than us is India and, um, we are the silly sods who taught them how to run one.
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - stunorthants26
You have to change a car to meet the demands of whichever market you are selling it in - if one or two brands did pull out, that actually makes it more cost effective for the remaining brands to make the changes for our particular market.

One thing that amuses me about the global warming thing - if we are to believe that seas will rise significantly, doesnt that just mean that we will all invest in boats instead of cars? I for one cant wait to see the first 'floating city'! Maybe im just an optimist :-)
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - gmac
You have to change a car to meet the demands of whichever market you are
selling it in


Reading that made me think DDR and Trabant. :(
130gm per km CO2 the new benchmark for VED? - Pendlebury
I'm all in favour of global warming with gas prices at the level they are at the moment.
Might cut down on my energy bills.