True? I assumed most interaction would happen downstream of the bikes? No idea which is correct.
It's a real effect tho. Years ago, in my irresponsible youth, my Mum's Metro GTi topped out at 75 with two bikes next to each other, and more like 95 with them on opposite sides of the roof. Saying that, I'm ashamed to say I verified it would do 120 without bikes.
|
Perhaps persistent speeders could have a variable number of bikes clamped to their cars to slow them down. The state would benefit from the extra fuel tax paid.
We would enjoy seeing £700 chav Corsas and the like with several grand's worth of mountain bikes on their roofs.
|
As a teenage Mountain Bike racer, I managed to get about £7k of mountain bikes on the roof of my Mk I 1.1 VW Jetta shed. The car was optimistically worth £200, would do about 60 without any bikes, and a lot less once the bikes were up there. It required patience when on the way to meets!!
Saying that, you could four wheel slide it at about 10 mph into my parents road (just a normal 90 degree turn in). Great fun, although terrifyingly little grip now I come to think of it.
|
With my Mountain bike mounted vertically atop my V70 2.4T, instantaneous consumption at 70MPH increased from the 30 MPG or thereabouts that I typically expect to get on level ground in still ambient air to around 26 MPG. I was amazed it was as much - I thought may be 1 or 1.5MPG - but since repeated several times I always get the same result.
I too now take the bike in the boot unless I have rear seat passengers.
|
70MPH:
Actual (GPS confirmed)
75 MPH displays on the speedometer.
|
|
|