Stuart,
Yep, my solution (no pun intended) too, but using screenwash. V. expensive...
(BTW could you get done for "passive alcohol consumption"? if you use the washers regularly?)
However, my point is that manufacturers go to great lengths to provide cupholders, etc, without addressing an issue that affects safety and sheer convenience of motoring. There must be an engineering fix, ideally using electricity rather than yet another coolant pipe offshoot.
"In extremis", I have carried a Fairy Liquid bottle (aaahh! the Blue Peter generation!) and simply squirted it on manually out the window. Crude, but it sure beats having collisions.. Another one was leaving the washer bottle half-emply and topping it up with boiling water first thing. The heat usually travels along the pipes and thaws the nozzles out. The 405 has five tiny nozzles on an arm attached to each wiper blade which, sitting right out in the airflow, is particularly vunerable.
Up here in Teesside it was a "cabin heater" job this morning, with a small fan heater in both vehicles 15 mins before boarding passengers.
rg
|
Can you get done for apssive alcohol consumption? Often wondered about that myself.
Another reason not to use the additive in full strength is the pong!
|
Is this stuff safe for the paintwork?
|
Ian,
Never had any problem. The alcohol is an ingredient anyway in washer additives, all that is being suggested is increasing the concentration from the 1% or so that the original stuff contains up to maybe 2-3%?
I don't know the exact concentration to use for a given freezing point as I understand the only way to determine this is by practical experiment.
But most additives say they are OK down to minus a big number if they are used neat as opposed to normal concentrations.
Freezing point of neat IPA is about -89C if that is any help.
SB
|
|
|