Thanks. Camry sounds interesting so I'll take a look. What I really need is a Rover 75!
|
If mpg isn't a significant issue Subaru Outback.
You'll get your reliability, very comfortable, sunroof, you may find one with cream leather, no wood!
|
I'll take a look. Thanks.
|
|
|
Thanks. Camry sounds interesting so I'll take a look. What I really need is a Rover 75!
The Rover is well past its retirement date so I'd avoid. Unfortunately with the list of 'not these' you've given us, not many 'proper luxury' cars remain that are stylish and haven't got a centre console that looks like a computer centre (Lexuses). 'Wood' (including the fake kind) is much rarer on newer cars these days.
I agree that the Camry (the equivalent of the mid-sized Lexus, so p[arts shouldn't be an issue even though it's no longer sold new since 2021) is probably a good bet. It is only an auto though (of the CVT type).
Other 'top end' saloons from the remainder tend to be fine but are often shod on blind wheels and tyres which makes them firmish riding. Some can downsize the wheels and use narrower, higher sidewall tyres to achieve better comfort, but often the addition of larger brakes on upper spec (especially the engine) precludes doing so.
In terms of styling (decent amount of kit for the price but a stylish, minimalist interior) and handling, the latest generation Mazda6 (which does have an estate version) or CX-5 (SUV) are both very good, and now come with 2.5L petrol engines which give reasonable performance.
They can have smooth (TC) autos as well as manuals, though not 'perfermance orientated' or quite as fuel efficient as the dual clutch units in other cars - but are far more reliable and work well on congested roads. Whether these two cars are 'luxury enough' and meet the ride quality criteria on the upper spec models, only you can decide.
As a Mazda (3) owner myself (for 16 years from new), they can be very good cars depending on needs, but the dealership network (post sales) is, in my view, rather hit and miss in terms of quality - you'd have to see by looking up reviews of the service and maintenance/parts departments for all your localish ones to see whether any were worth using.
If you did consider Mazdas, I'd also avoid buying the diesels (at least second hand) as they are far less reliable if previous owners used them regularly on short trips from cold (DPF and/or fuel dilution problems). Petrol-engined cars are reliable.
|
Thanks very much for a comprehensive answer. I rather like Mazdas and we have a local dealer, so maybe worth having a look there. Would you believe I used to have a Mazda Xedos 9? One of my favourite cars ever.
I appreciate I am somewhat restricting myself. I can't get over the image problems with the big German luxury brands. My issue with VAG is purely that I would like an auto and theirs are all DCT. I had a DCT Golf up until a couple of years ago and pulling away in it was a matter of pure chance over whether it would move normally, at all or take off like a firework. Never again.
|
There are not many Xedos lovers about - 1998 until 2014.
Under £1,000 repairs in all that time - mostly related to perished bushes, seized calipers age related deterioration. Never left us stranded at the side of the road. 10/10
|
|
Thanks very much for a comprehensive answer. I rather like Mazdas and we have a local dealer, so maybe worth having a look there. Would you believe I used to have a Mazda Xedos 9? One of my favourite cars ever.
They appear to be highly regarded by former owners. At that time, most of Mazda's problems related to rusting (now not an issue as far as I'm aware) and mis-use (as shopping cars) of rotary engined models that lead to reliability problems.
I appreciate I am somewhat restricting myself. I can't get over the image problems with the big German luxury brands. My issue with VAG is purely that I would like an auto and theirs are all DCT. I had a DCT Golf up until a couple of years ago and pulling away in it was a matter of pure chance over whether it would move normally, at all or take off like a firework. Never again.
Can perfectly understand this. From what I gather, the BMW and Hyundai / KIA DCTs appear to be far more reliable than those from VAG, Ford and to some extent Renault / Nissan.
Often it is the manufacturer of 'auto' gearbox used that seems to make as much if not more of a difference to how well engineered / relaible / long-lasting they are.
Many reviewers, both professional journos and punters alike seem to favour those from Aisin (which BMW have used at least in the past [not sure about their latest DCTs, but definitely for their TC ones], Toyota and some others have done/still do) over Jatco (which Renault / Nissan use, if I recall). Similar for CVTs when used.
Mazda, I think, use their own, which may or may not be an evolution of a Ford-derived unit they used during their tie-up with them and Volvo up until the split about a decade ago, which was when Ford and Volvo then started using their own (IMHO very bad) DCT.
The Mazda unit used since the 'divorce' from Ford appear to be reliable as I don't recall hearing about complaints over reliability - only some about it being a TC auto and not being so 'sporty' and fuel efficient as other brands' DCTs.
TBH, decent (relaible) CVTs are fine performance-wise and only are 'whiney' when accelerating hard, so not that often. For general driving they probably aren't much different to the TC autos in noise.
With the German 'upmarket' brands, you are often paying for preceived 'quality' - essentially badge snobbery - rather than actual superior engineering quality over the best from South Korea and Japan. In my view, BMW get the closest on that score.
VAG sub-brands such as SEAT and Skoda are as good as the likes of VW and Audi on engineering and because they are cheaper, they represent far better value for money, especially for the long-term buyer.
It's why so many Backroomers here will buy (and subseuqnetly strongly recommend, at least for manual ones or DCTs where they mainly do longer trips on free-flowing roads) cars like the Octavia, Superb and Leon over the Passat, A3 saloon / A4 / A6 etc. If you don't want or need an auto, don't count them out - as long as you can find a good local main dealer for the post sales experience.
|
|
..... I can't get over the image problems with the big German luxury brands.
As a contented Audi A8 owner I'm puzzled by this. Please explain! Also, the older ones are ZF torque converter autos, not DCT.
|
Yeah, I’m a bit puzzled by the “image” thing too.
I’ve always bought/run whatever works for me at the time, whether it be a Mondeo or a Merc, a Corsa or a Cosworth. Don’t give, and never have given, the slightest flying fig about what anyone else might think of my choices.
Just none of their business and every bit all of mine really.
|
Yeah, I’m a bit puzzled by the “image” thing too. I’ve always bought/run whatever works for me at the time, whether it be a Mondeo or a Merc, a Corsa or a Cosworth. Don’t give, and never have given, the slightest flying fig about what anyone else might think of my choices. Just none of their business and every bit all of mine really.
I wish I could say the same. I do care what people think of me and my choices. It's rather tiresome...
|
|
|
..... I can't get over the image problems with the big German luxury brands.
As a contented Audi A8 owner I'm puzzled by this. Please explain! Also, the older ones are ZF torque converter autos, not DCT.
Perhaps he means the possible image of German car owners (particularly of BMWs, Mercs and Audis) being seen as by some as 'flash gits' - including how they are driven.
These days, they aren't the 'only for the well-off' (well not until the current financial issues anyway) that they may of been in the past. And they aren't just the preserve of speed merchants who like to push their way out of junctions and slip roads... :-)
Possible with the addition of the expensive but complex and, for some cars (more Mercs and the DCT VAGs [especially when mainly used in slow moving traffic] in my view) their reliability not matching their expensive price tag.
To be fair, VAG hasn't used torque converter auto gearboxes for some time now, and the OP may realise that as regards the possible lower reliability of their DCT (DSG) gearboxes, especially when buying second hand where it is nigh on impossible to know the driving pattern of previous owners and thus how worn their DSG box is.
|
|
..... I can't get over the image problems with the big German luxury brands.
As a contented Audi A8 owner I'm puzzled by this. Please explain! Also, the older ones are ZF torque converter autos, not DCT.
I'll explain, but you might not like the answer!
Mercedes - lovely, but for old people who play golf (see also Jaguar). Rustier than you think.
BMW - endless gear changes to get any torque out of the minute power band. Interiors fall to bits.
Audi - drive 1cm behind you on the motorway flashing their lights.
Nonsense prejudices, all of them, but they won't leave my head!
|
Don’t pay a stupid price for a secondhand car when you can have a new one.
I have just ordered a new Citroen C5x Sense Plus on the road for £24,490. This is a Stellantis Group brand now which includes Maserati and Alfa Romeo. Look in Autotrader to quote the price to your local Citroen dealer.
£540 to extend the warranty by two years, and the service plan is £19.20 a month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don’t pay a silly price for a secondhand car when you can have a new one.
If you want a comfortable car go for the new Citroen C5x. Fantastic ride quality, super comfortable seats, loads of tech including Stop and Go, Extended Blind Spot Monitoring. Acoustic glass all round on top models. 8 speed automatic. This car is built for comfort. Nearly as big as a Skoda Superb. Hatchback with 575 litres of boot space with the seats up
I have just ordered a new Citroen C5x Sense Plus on the road for £24,490. This is a Stellantis Group brand now which includes Maserati and Alfa Romeo. Build quality is fantastic, the car is not manufactured in France. Look in Autotrader to quote the price to your local Citroen dealer.
£540 to extend the warranty by two years, and the service plan is £19.20 a month.
Edited by Speedbird 747 on 16/05/2022 at 20:50
|
Don’t pay a silly price for a secondhand car when you can have a new one.
If you want a comfortable car go for the new Citroen C5x. Fantastic ride quality, super comfortable seats, loads of tech including Stop and Go, Extended Blind Spot Monitoring. Acoustic glass all round on top models. 8 speed automatic. This car is built for comfort. Nearly as big as a Skoda Superb. Hatchback with 575 litres of boot space with the seats up
I have just ordered a new Citroen C5x Sense Plus on the road for £24,490. This is a Stellantis Group brand now which includes Maserati and Alfa Romeo. Build quality is fantastic, the car is not manufactured in France. Look in Autotrader to quote the price to your local Citroen dealer.
£540 to extend the warranty by two years, and the service plan is £19.20 a month.
It seems like a lovely car, but I don't think I have ever seen someone suggest that buying a brand new big Citroen made financial sense! I will look into it, though. Thanks
|
Citroen are offering an introductory discount on the C5x, but you have to be quick. This is unheard of to get a discount at this time. If your priority is comfort and a quiet environment with a low cost of ownership, the C5x ticks a lot of boxes. All the reviews are fantastic. This is the first time I have ever bought a car without seeing it.
Over the years I have had two new Citroens. In 2001 a Picasso Exclusive and in 2003 a C5 Exclusive estate. Both cars were no problem. However in 2016 I bought a new BMW 5 series estate that had EGR problems that were not resolved before the warranty ran out, and my weekend car a 2001 Mercedes CLK Avantgarde cabriolet has cost me £16,845 in repairs and servicing over 16 years of ownership. Every time I had a big bill, I thought I would hang onto it a bit longer. I should have got rid of it years ago.
Yes people change the subject when you tell them you have bought a Citroen, but that is their ignorance. They would rather pay £178.00 an hour labour at a Mercedes dealership, and Mercedes don’t even want to know about older cars like mine. This car is just Citroen in name badge only, it is a Stellantis. https://www.stellantis.com/en
|
Citroen are offering an introductory discount on the C5x, but you have to be quick. This is unheard of to get a discount at this time. If your priority is comfort and a quiet environment with a low cost of ownership, the C5x ticks a lot of boxes. All the reviews are fantastic. This is the first time I have ever bought a car without seeing it.
Over the years I have had two new Citroens. In 2001 a Picasso Exclusive and in 2003 a C5 Exclusive estate. Both cars were no problem. However in 2016 I bought a new BMW 5 series estate that had EGR problems that were not resolved before the warranty ran out, and my weekend car a 2001 Mercedes CLK Avantgarde cabriolet has cost me £16,845 in repairs and servicing over 16 years of ownership. Every time I had a big bill, I thought I would hang onto it a bit longer. I should have got rid of it years ago.
Yes people change the subject when you tell them you have bought a Citroen, but that is their ignorance. They would rather pay £178.00 an hour labour at a Mercedes dealership, and Mercedes don’t even want to know about older cars like mine. This car is just Citroen in name badge only, it is a Stellantis. https://www.stellantis.com/en
You've drive one, though, right? I have nothing against Citroens - my parents had 2 CXs, 2 XMs an AX and a 2CV. I suppose where I'm coming from is an expectation that I will sell it after a few years and a big Citroen will be worth next to nothing. Any brand new car will lose a big chunk as soon as you buy it (VAT) and, generally, the bigger and more French, the more you lose from then on. If I knew I'd keep it for 10+ years, no problems, but I know I won't.
I have to say I'm not convinced that merging with Fiat is going to improve Citroen's reputation at all.
|
This car is just Citroen in name badge only, it is a Stellantis. https://www.stellantis.com/en
Curious statement. It suggests that the name Stellantis is going to mean anything at all to the average person (very, very doubtful), and also that the average person is going to think of the name as being a positive ("Oh, Citroen is now part of Stellantis, well that defo makes it a better car").
Just imagine the conversation in the golf club car park;
"I see you've bought a Citroen",
"No, I've bought a Stellantis"
"A what?"
:-)
Also, given that most of what is underneath a C5 X was developed before the Stallantis deal came about, it is actually a PSA Group car if anything.
I also don't think it is very realistic to suggest that because you had one new Citroen in 2001, another in 2003, and had no problems with either, a modern Citroen must be reliable.
As it happens, I do like the C5 X, and I do like that Citroen are focussing on comfort. But no way would I part with my own money for one new, especially if I was only planning to keep it a few years.
|
|
|
|