Perhaps because I'm not normal people? If thats so, I'll have to try much harder to feel broken up about it.
I'll get on that right away.
Re the standard "Everything from the major manufacturer must be for the best, in the best of all possible worlds" jive, well, yeh, you would think that, wouldn't you, though it aint necessarily always so.
Possible explanations as to why they might not be using them might include those I mention above, i.e. short plug life (commercially a downer) and electrical interference (possibly illegal and quite likely to involve collateral unpleasantness with highly strung computerised cars, like normal people drive.).
Apparently this effect doesn't usually work with resistive low interference plugs, like normal people use.
Some motorcycles spec non-resistive plugs, so I suppose sufficient RF suppression for legality can be achieved by other means but (a) I'm not sure that motorcyclists are normal people. I'd suspect not (in the UK anyway. Here there are so many of them I suppose they must be), and (b) motorcycles tend to use CDI and I'm not sure if this effect is compatible with that.
But I'd have to concede your point that if I wanted b*******, the major manufacturers could supply all my present and future needs, without any need to go poking around on the internyet.
Here's an abstract (all you get without paying) of an SAE (not well known for b*******) paper on it.
www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/.../
They seem to think it has potential for igniting extremely lean-burn mixtures. The use of the phrase "conventional peaking capacitor ignition techniques, which normally employ non-resistor spark plugs" (they apparently get it to work with a resistive plug) might suggest that it isn't as loony fringe as I first thought, simply because I hadn't heard of it,
But then I knew I didn't know everything...I wonder if that's normal?
|