Around this time of year someone usually brings up an argument that we should use BST (British Summer Time) all year round.
Geography means that at locations further West than Greenwich, sunrise and sunset are later than GMT (Greenwich Men Time) and locations further North have shorter hours of daylight in winter.
Those suggesting this change are mostly living/working in the South East and I suspect are under the age of about 50 years.
They don't remember that Harold Wilson had a trial of this from October 1968 to October 1971, when the trial was ended on a free vote in Parliament.
Many people living and working in the North and West remember this being commonly described as B----y Silly Time, as they seldom saw daylight during the working week from October to March.
RoSpa trot out the argument that accidents increase by 8% when the clocks go back. Logic says that there must be an 8% reduction in Spring when the clocks go forward, but I have never heard them say so (I wonder why?).
Computers, modern central heating timers, radio controlled clocks and watches adjust automatically, so it is a simpler change now than in 1971.
Claiming it would ease communication with Europe is hardly valid, I have worked for two companies with headquarters in the USA and dealt on a daily basis with European companies, we had no problems communication across the time zones.
I will await comments with interest.
|