It's reassuring to see that an accessory to the death has been punished. At his age it's unbelievable that he didn't know better, what a tosspot.
Dunno.
The primary responsibility clearly rests with the driver of the car that crashed, but the article says he was too severely injured to be charged.
This seems odd to me.
The article doesn't state whether the driver will be prosecuted if he recovers, but if he isn't, this would be an anomally, not quite The Law is An Ass grade, but getting there.
Sorry, that's Legal.
Because it is.
Perhaps you can move it again.
Edited by edlithgow on 30/11/2019 at 03:09
|