Do Toyota, Subaru, Hyundai and Kia actually have confidence - or simply invest the extra warranty costs in promoting their brand?
My Hyundai Santa Fe spent more time "off-road" being repaired under warranty than all the cars together that I've owned in 40 years - having had the engine/transmission rebuilt at 3 years old, I didn't have the bottle to keep it past its 5-year warranty end date.
Whatever the reasoning, the maker is standing by their product almost twice as long and in Kia's case for more than twice as long as the european marques, that would give me peace of mind if i was a new car buyer, and as used car buyer of vehicles usually long out of warranty (mainly Toyota/Subaru) the long term durability of the overall vehicles are good, also the vehicles have been designed to be worked on (with few notable awkward jobs) so make good choices for the DIYer.
Apart from Toyota's MMT automated manual gearbox (no car maker has made an AM worth a light yet far as i know) you do not hear of the regular drive train failures that plague euro makes with odd gearboxes, maybe the jury is still out on Korean double clutch boxes, not something that would appeal to me anyway, note Toyota/Subaru have given such boxes a wide berth, MMT must have caused major embarrassment at Toyota HQ and they ain't going down that road again.
Not sure where Hyundai went wrong with the Santa Fe, it does seem to have it's share of problems, and it has put me off used Sorentos too for the same reason, pity because both Hyundai and Kia had already established themselves as makers of good value durable old school 4x4's with Terracan and Sorento 1 respectively, how did it go so wrong?
|