In the case of the Giulietta, Mito and 4C, i think i'd have to agree with skidpan. I do get the appeal of Alfa, and i do like the new Giulia. But in the case of the above, well they just are not good enough. The Giulietta and Mito were nowhere near the best in class when new, and while the competition has moved on a generation or even two, the Alfa's, sadly, having remained stationary, have fallen further and further behind. And i don't buy into this 'true petrolheads must own an Alfa at some point in their lives', at least not regarding Alfa's which are just re-bodied Fiat's. As for the 4C, hampered by it's gearbox and girth, it is hopelessly outclassed by the Lotus Elise.
The Giulia does seem to be a step in the right direction, but of course how it works long term remains to be seen, and of course, how the dealers perform. And yes, the Stelvio is set to give Alfa a much needed sales boost, but as i don't like SUV's in general, i am indifferent to it.
Some of my all time favourite cars are Alfa's (though admittedly most were pre-1970's), and the breathtaking type 33 Stradale remains one of, if not the, sexiest looking car ever to be made!.
But i guess i should be happy that Alfa does at least have some sort of identity of it's own and a presence in the UK. Unlike poor old Lancia, who went from being one of the most innovative, advanced, high quality and engineering led car companies, to selling fugly, ill-proportioned, re-bodied Fiat's. A sad ignominy for such a company.
Someone earlier mentioned them (Giulietta's) holding their value well, but a quick look on autotrader comparing the prices of the Giulietta with equivalent Golf's does not seem to support this. One example being a 2015 Giulietta 1.7 TBi Quadrifoglio Verde 240BHP (16k miles) priced at £16990, versus a Golf GTI 230PS DSG (20k miles) priced at £21500. Given they probably cost a similar amount new, the Alfa has lost 25% more of it's value.
|