Not seen this reported on the news yet?
Probably because of Trumpmania but on the bbc they are still saying it's due to come in next year!.
|
|
|
All well and good, but two items are omited from that article, firstly the number of prosecutions has gone down drastically, not because less people are using mobles but because enforcement has dropped.
And secondly no mention of any extra measures (traffic police) to ensure it is carried out, so higher penalties for the few caught and little change in the numbers using phones.
|
|
|
|
Not before time. Though money to some folks who have it. £200, wont make a difference. Hit them hard by taking away their Licence and made to sit another test till they get it into their heads that driving and Mobile Phones are not compatible.
|
|
|
|
Police should run a camaign to target mobile phone users and hit them hard. Automatic ban for repeat offenders, doubling with each offence. Then it won't matter if you do have pots of money or a company to pay the fine.
|
|
|
the points are justified but the monetary penalty is way too low. £750-£1000 may start to register with people. Second offence should see a doubling of both .
|
|
|
|
Excellent news. There is enough death on the road without this unnecessary hazard. Surely there is enough cheap technology to cater for hands-free communication.
|
|
|
This affects only people who are holding a phone - and I don't see how that is much different from holding an apple or a bottle; it's not holding the phone that's the problem except, I suppose, that you have to look at a phone to dial or text, The real problem is having the brain dealing with a call and with driving at the same time - you only have to see how people's driving goes haywire when they're on the phone to realise that. A phone's being linked to the car doesn't help with the brain.
I think that phones and their in-car systems should be disabled when the car is moving except to be able to take messages, which the driver can deal with when he/she stops. I know that this goes against the modern imperative to respond instantly but that is better than killing someone.
|
This affects only people who are holding a phone - and I don't see how that is much different from holding an apple or a bottle; it's not holding the phone that's the problem except, I suppose, that you have to look at a phone to dial or text, The real problem is having the brain dealing with a call and with driving at the same time - you only have to see how people's driving goes haywire when they're on the phone to realise that. A phone's being linked to the car doesn't help with the brain. I think that phones and their in-car systems should be disabled when the car is moving except to be able to take messages, which the driver can deal with when he/she stops. I know that this goes against the modern imperative to respond instantly but that is better than killing someone.
I wholeheartedly agree. When you are on the phone you are looking at the situation at the other end of the call. When talking to passengers, it is easy to just stop when the situation on the road demands it - they can see that, or be told. It is not necessary to be constantly connected. I realise that this makes passengers also unable to make/receive calls but so what? The world will not end if they can't either.
I like your solution of only receiving messages [preferably text] which are delayed until the engine is switched off. There's always the fool who will coast with the engine off so that he/she can be extra stupid. Can't legislate against utter stupidity.
|
|
Glad you agree. A passenger could always use a hand-held.
|
|
|
|
Tough up the penalty. Enforce it- this means more police doing their jobs.It's not their fault they are understaffed but it's no point in having laws and not being able to enforce them.
It's not just mobile phones that are the problem- it is anything that distracts the driver including sat navs. Most new cars now have so much advanced tech on the dashboard that the driver is easily diverted from properly driving the car.
|
|
|
|
They may as well set the death penalty for using a mobile - we all know its not enforced & idiots on mobiles will continue to get away with it.
|
|
|
|
I think if you are cought using a hand held mobile wile you are driving it should be an instent ban. coss there is no need for it at all and it is very dangerus .
|
|
|
We seemed to manage to have a life before mobiles, hit the idiots hard!!!
£1000 for first offence, 12 months ban and £2000 for a repeat offence
|
|
|
Car manufacturers very much at fault for all the tech, particularly touch screens, that visually and mentally detract from driving. Amazing that the busybodies in Brussels that come up with so much so-called safety regulations for so many things have let this slide through, or does the old cynic in me think that the car industry is too good at "lobbying" the Eurocrats.
Having said that, the use of personal handheld tech is utterly irresponsible and when detected (please more Police checking on bad driving not just easy speed enforcement), there should be no questions-asked 1 year ban and a fine proportional to annual income.
|
|
|
Great, but where have all the traffic Police gone? What's the point of a law if there is no one to enforce it?
Why not extend this to drivers smoking cigarettes? Doesn't involve the brain much but still very dangerous.
|
|
|
|
Sadly, there is evidence that using a phone with bluetooth impairs concentration and the responsiveness of drivers, so the concern should be widened to research whether cars becoming smartphones on wheels enhance or impair overall road safety. Even with solid research that infotainment systems in cars are distracting and increase the risk of accidents, I cannot see car manufacturers ensuring that such systems are not accessible when on the move. The only solution would be for more education as legislation to restrict the use of infotainment systems on the move seems unlikely. How do you draw the line between changing the radio station and sending a voice activated text when driving down the M1 at 70mph?
|
|
|
|
With more and more dashcams in use all you need is a website to post your clips of offenders and the law should allow these to be used as evidence. Watch the number of prosecutions rise and then offences will drastically fall.
|
|
|
I would agree with those who feel this does not go far enough, I used to manage train drivers and any driver caught using a mobile whilst driving was for dismissal.
I would make it a steep penalty, say £2500 for first time, plus points and a 2 year ban and £5000 fine for second offence to get the message home.
We managed perfectly well before mobiles and I do question the use of hands free and driving by Satnav as well, it all serves to distract and consequently puts lives at risk.
|
|
|
Brilliant news,should be an automatic loss of license,and there insurance sky hi.
About time.
|
|
|
