Stronger cars = harder to see out, with thicker blindspots = accidents continue, although injuries are less severe while fatalities are reduced too.

I bet you cannot find any evidence to support that assertion.

You don't need more than a few brain cells to realise what I typed is correct.

"Speed camera partnerships...." - the name gives the game away.

Part of the definition of a commercial partnership is that it's there to make a profit. These 'partnerships' may not be quite the same thing, but they wouldn't be called partnerships unless there was some commercial value in it.

Indeed - a speed camera was installed in my parents' home town on a stretch of main road going out of town through an industrial area, just because (the minimum justification supposedly) one elderly driver was killed at a double roundabout due to speed - I believe it was because the accident was on a downward slope and due to the age of the driver (they misjudged the speed they should've been at when they arrived at the roundabout), and not general 'speeding' 250m away where the camera now sits (now a 30mph speed limit, was 40mph), catching many people who are otherwise driving safely at 35mph. At least they've pianted the rear of the camera box the reflective orange colour now so it can be seen.

All too often any actual speeding is when a young person is joyriding or a middle-aged person is showing off in their sports saloon, whereby they go far above the previous speed limit, and so reducing the speed and adding a camera doesn't deter anyone who is driving unsafely. Too many 'red flag' brigade people in charge of/have too much influence over council and police these days - we need to get out there to influence these organisations rather than just sounding off via web forums and shouting at our TVs - I'm just as guilty as most.