What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - Trilogy

www.petrolicious.com/citroen-gs-1220-pallas? Love the non cancelling indicators, just like my Dyane in the 1980s. Shame car design has moved backwards compared with this. 2.5 million sold tells you quirky does sell.

Launched in 1970—the same year as the famous SM—the GS filled an important slot in the Citroën range. Up until the GS arrived there had been an obvious gap between the frugal 2CV and its derivatives and the large and luxurious DS. GS stood for Grand Series to really point out that this was the marques’ new volume car.

The 13.7-ft long (4.2-metre) GS was aimed at the growing middle class, and competed both in size, performance and price with cars like the Ford Taunus/Cortina, Opel Ascona, Saab 96, Morris Marina, Fiat 124, Alfasud and Volkswagen K70.

Why pick the GS over the more mainstream competition? Simple: its advanced construction and unrivalled ride comfort. It had the hydropneumatic suspension and brake system of its larger siblings, disc brakes all ’round, and a newly-developed, high-revving air-cooled four cylinder engine.

I drive a 1975 Citroën GS 1220 Pallas. It has the slighter larger engine of 1,222-cc, compared to the first cars, offered with just a 1,015-cc engine. The Pallas trim in the Citroën range means it’s the top model with more brightwork, thicker carpeting, and higher-spec upholstery. Even today, I think it’s really elegant—and has aged remarkably well.

It was bought new by a man in Kiruna, the northernmost town in Sweden—a small community north of the Arctic Circle. Rather oddly, he only drove three cars in his life, the first a Model T Ford, the second a ’50s Ford Taunus 12m, and finally, the Citroën GS. He must really have felt the technical development of the car industry with each trade-up!

After some 30 years of pedantical ownership (he was well known at the local Citroën garage) he sold the car to an enthusiast who had a light restoration of the car carried out. There was no rust at all and the tobacco brown interior was in very good condition, but the original metallic paint work was very matted down by time.

When I was 18 and just had received my driving licence in the mid-eighties, there were plenty of GS models around to choose from. Better yet, they were dirt cheap! I ran a string of them, buying them for a song, enjoying their comfort and roadholding until an expensive part broke, usually after a year or so. Then it was passed on to another motorist even more cheaply—or scrapped.

This example, however, was a whole new deal: a GS in almost mint condition. I was proud to really care for it, and I only used in the summer time. As soon as I got behind the one-spoke steering wheel, I felt at home. Despite its humble engine capacity, the GS is a car that loves to be driven…and the feel of performance you get out of the 1.2-litre engine is a lot stronger than the 60 horsepower its specification says.

The feeling on road is of a much larger car, with stability and road holding that beggars belief—just look at those narrow tires! The only thing you have to adapt to is the high-revving engine: 5500–6000 rpm on the motorway sounds a lot but feels totally effortless for the car.

When you compare the GS with the often three times more expensive SM coupé you see many similarities.

In period, the Citroën GS lived up to its name and became a big seller—at least by Citroën standards. Together with its facelifted successor, the GSA, more than 2.5 million cars were built. Today, sadly very few still exist…and the interest even among Citroën enthusiasts is very limited.

I think the GS is even more fascinating than the larger DS and SM—because, like the 2CV, the GS was a “people’s car” that drove as well as the very best cars of its era.

Want to see your road trip on Petrolicious? Click here for more information.

Edited by Trilogy on 03/04/2015 at 11:44

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - jc2

If they were so marvellous,why have so few survived?

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - John F

Humdrum shape, unremarkable engineering. Hardly a classic. Now the Ford Anglebox with reverse slope rear window modified with lowered suspension, a 1600GT engine and a Lotus g/box.....ah, happy memories - truly a classic. I wonder if there are any left?

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - madf

Built in rust . Noisy engines. Death trap in a crash...

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - Trilogy

As madh says, rust. Nor were they particularly reliable, being much more complex than others in that sector. Most cars of that era had noisy engines and were death traps. At least this handled superbly, and could stop, due to all round disc brakes. Doubt there were many cars in that class with all round discs. I thought it was rather smooth, with the flat four, air cooled engine.

I wonder how many survive in warmer climates?

Edited by Trilogy on 03/04/2015 at 16:48

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - Happy Blue!

The problem with some 'great' cars was that the greatness was overwhelmed by the reliability, poor construction and poor materials. Two great cars of the 1970s (the Alfasud and the GS) had many supurb and advanced features, including space, excellent ride and handling, smooth flat four engines, Kamm tail etc, but all we remember them for is rust and unreliability.

However, the Mk1 Ford Escort is remembered and there are many still around despite being totally unremarkable in terms of engineering design, but were sufficiently simple so that tin worm etc was not considered abnormal.

I wonder what cars of the last 15 years would be remembered as being advanced.

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - alastairq

And the dashboard plastic of the Mk2 made me car sick....

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - Bianconeri

The problem with some 'great' cars was that the greatness was overwhelmed by the reliability, poor construction and poor materials. Two great cars of the 1970s (the Alfasud and the GS) had many supurb and advanced features, including space, excellent ride and handling, smooth flat four engines, Kamm tail etc, but all we remember them for is rust and unreliability.

However, the Mk1 Ford Escort is remembered and there are many still around despite being totally unremarkable in terms of engineering design, but were sufficiently simple so that tin worm etc was not considered abnormal.

I wonder what cars of the last 15 years would be remembered as being advanced.

Got to agree 100% with this. I had both a GS Club and an Alfasud 5M back in the day and both were remarkable for just how good they were. You have to compare them with the competition and forget the "French cars are rubbish" and " Italian cars are rust buckets" stereotypes. Both were brilliant and I'd love a GS Pallas to join my classic car dream fleet. Not as much as a DS though... Or maybe an Alfasud Green Cloverleaf...or..

Edited by Bianconeri on 04/04/2015 at 22:54

Accessible Classic: The Fantastic, Forgotten Citro - Avant

That was how the VW Golf came to be such a success in the 1970s, and has never looked back. It was almost as reliable as the Beetle, and (at least the bigger-engined versions) as good to drive as anything else that size. And it was less prone to rust.

It was also a hatchback, which the Austin Allegro, successor to the 1100/1300, should have ben but wasn't: and of course the Allegro managed to be both unreliable and unremarkable to drive.

Edited by Avant on 05/04/2015 at 01:00