It always amazes me how many people who 'drive', think that one has to drive in a 'special manner' for a driving test.
This is not the case.
The Examiner is looking for [in the case of Cat B] a reasonable standard of competence. The Candidate is expected to exercise a thorough, working knowledge of the Highway Code.
The Candidate should be able to demonstrate they can 'keep up with the flow of traffic, if safe to do so'...this is an assessment of competence, not a 'rule' which must forever more be complied with.
For CAt B, the candidate must demonstrate they can park their vehicle properly. They must also demonstrate they can follow their intended route[road signage]..
I note above, a question regarding 'effective observation?' [ie, what constitutes 'effective observation?]......if a candidate fails to demonstrate effective observation,. they will receive drivng faults..perhaps a serious fault [test fail]...So, what do you lot think is meant by 'effective observation?'
Coming up with the excuse, 'I didn't see them' is the result of ineffective observation...so where do you think you will look before proceeding?
Is there anywhere you don't think you have to look?
There is also much misunderstanding by candidates , of what they have heard in instruction.
Any Instructor will know, there is a huge difference between why the candidate thinks they have failed, and what the Examiner says they have failed on.
The example of a novice driver 'drivng to the speed limit, ''because my instructor said so'' is a classic example of a lack of comprehension of that aspect, where, and why it was said, etc.
There are books in WH Smiths..usually near to the Highway Code, which outline the DVSA syllabus for each test category.
|