Recently I've noticed some newer used cars have decent warranty periods on them, eg 10+ plate Toyota's, and the Kia's.
However, I'm finding it really hard to put a value on the warranty, many people I've asked seem to feel the warranties aren't worth much on a car which is already proven. Specifically it appears that warranties can be summarized as covering anything which can be classed as a "manufacturors defect", whereas pretty much anything that is likely to go wrong would class as "wear and tear" or "driver error", and thus not be covered by the warranty.
Since I'm in the market for a 1-4 year old car, I'm wondering whether warranty is something I should even be adding in to the equation, and if so what presedence should I be giving it?
example: Given 2 equivalent cars in every way of the same make model and variant, a 10 plate for 11k with no warranty, and the same car in a 11 plate for £13k with 2 years warranty left - is that warranty worth the extra £2-3k.
Thanks for any advice!
|