Whilst it's not the best handling / performing car, what about the updated version (2016-19) of the KIA Venga / Hyundai ix20 in 1.6 petrol (TC) auto form (part of the update was to change from a older, less efficient 4 speed box to a newer 6 speed one). Good all round visibility.
Still not as fuel efficient as a normal hatchback like the gen-4 Mazda3 2L petrol auto, but supposedly nearer to 35mpg than the 4spd box got (32 real world mpg), sometimes as high as 40mpg on longer runs out of town.
A smaller footprint than the Mazda3 (hatch) but a bigger boot. Whilst I liked the drive (handling - excellent) of the Mazda3, performance-wise (better than the Venga/ix30 though) it wasn't much of a step-up to my old 1.6 gen-1 car for 'ordinary' driving, and I thought that rear visibility was not great due to the small rear window. Not so bad when it comes with rear parking sensors.
Seen a good few 2016-19 examples (all Venga 3 1.6 petrol auto 6spd) PXed and resold quickly at my local KIA dealership over the last year or so, all of which visually looked (I obviously couldn't see underneath, but no MOT failures on that score / anything of note) in very good condition. All in the £8.5k - £12k price range.
I'd say that the OP really needs to test drive some of the other cars, as they might find one of those suggested alternatives not quite as 'bad' for the size as they may feel. The Venga/ix20 seems more to be a 'town' car as it has a soft-ish ride, though apparently not so good on properly bumpy country lanes.
Note my previous comments on another thread that the gen-2 Auris (it may be the previous version though, possibly both) may be part of the cadre affected by poor CAT security and thus might lead to a big insurance premium, particularly if the OP lives in an area where CAT theft is prevalent.
I do sympathise as I had similar issues (and still do) when I was working back in 2017 and looking to replace my 2006 Mazda3 with a TC/CVT auto car of a similar size to my own. I just wasn't moved to buy a replacement back then, though now I might not be so picky if push came to shove. Still cheaper to keep the existing car on the road if rust doesn't take hold in a major way.
As you've said before SLO, early Ceeds were (like most KIAs back then) not so good on underbody rust protection, especially in areas near the seaside or ones that have their roads salted a lot in winter. Neither were the Mazda3s in gen-1 and 2 form (I've been relatively lucky with mine), gen-3s and the Mazda2 don't seem to have suffered from that problem though, at least I haven't seen reports of this nature here or elsewhere.
The Mazda CX-3 in 2L petrol TC auto form might do, as the boot is nearer to that of the Mazda3 of the same era, but a smaller footprint and the same interior style/size as the 2. Probably not good for taller people though, given its small interior, though fine for younger kids and adults under 6ft (I found it ok and I'm 5ft 10in tall).
Just avoid the Sport spec cars and 4WD versions to avoid a firm ride and no chance of having an underboot area for a spacesaver wheel/tyre (which may not come with the car [not standard fit], but you can buy for the extortionate sum of £400 from Mazda) due to either the 4WD tunnel or perhaps upgraded ICE equipment (CD changer/subwoofer) taking its place.
The SE-L (Nav or not [can always use your smart phone for sat nav]) is the best value spec for Mazdas of that era, SE spec not bad (might be more difficult to find an auto) if you're not that concerned about having climate control rather than manual A/C.
All assuming the CX-3 is within budget - some early examples are now being sold near to the £9k - £10k mark.
|