I heard of a similar case where the service was not carried out on time because the KiA dealer was closed during the pandemic.
The owner was faced with a bill of £6.5 k for a new engine which failed and KIA refused to pay because of the incomplete service record
Whilst possibly some hearsay involved i see various youtube etc clips where mechanics particularly in the USA speak of grenading engines on the two Korean sister makes.
That and the seemingly poor underbody rust protection are partly why modern Kia/Hyundai and Mazda arn't on my list of possibles (we usually buy used and typically keeping till old), its disconcerting the number of posts here and elsewhere regarding Kia warranty refusals, not as warranty would be an issue for me personally given the age of our usual purchases but principle where a maker stands by, or deosn't, their product when things go wrong, does matter.
It would be interesting to hear of experiences good and bad with Hyundai warranties.
going back to the OP, its vitally important to check service history carefully before buying, did you take the sales persons word for things or was the SH 'difficult' to obtain during the actual sale process...or is that service history in virtual form on the main dealer's computers, which means further complication if the service desk won't play ball because you technically don't own the vehicle at that point...data protection eyewash excuses?
As said above, if the warranty is void anyway, ditch the main dealer network and upgrade the servicing via a competent indy, i suggest halving required engine oil changes anyway (its not possible to overservice a car) and you'll still be in pocket with a more regularly serviced car.
Edited by gordonbennet on 21/01/2024 at 11:32
|