What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

I've seen a 15 year old car for sale, immaculate, 2 owners, excellent MOT history, with no significant advisories ever and any have been sorted by the next MOT, but there's no service history or receipts.

Does the condition and excellent MOT record negate the lack of service history?

Opinions much appreciated - thanks.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - badbusdriver

I'd assume the lack of service history is because it has been lost?.

IMO, how much that would affect its value and saleability would depend on a number of factors, probably most important being what car it is and what the asking price is relative to the same car with full history.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

BBD, That appears to be the case.

I'd say the price is £300/400 less than it should be. It's a C-Max.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Adampr

BBD, That appears to be the case.

I'd say the price is £300/400 less than it should be. It's a C-Max.

Could a Ford dealer produce some history if you gave the VIN?

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

I've already tried, ridiculously only the servicing dealer is able to provide such information.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Xileno

As a minimum I would want to know when the cambelt was last done. If it's overdue then that's the £300 to £400 saving gone, possibly a bit more. You can get a good idea how a car's been maintained by looking at the tyres. A matched set of a fairly decent makes is a good sign rather than a mixture of cheap and cheerful ones.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Terry W

15 year old C max's are currently advertised on Autotrader for £1-2k.

Given the age I suspect that the principal determinant of a "good buy" is condition not service history. Inspect the visible bits - oil, spark plug condition (petrol), brake disc corrosion, tyres, locks lubricated/working etc etc.

If it is £3-400 cheaper than you may otherwise expect it may represent a good deal.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - badbusdriver

The fact that it is a C-Max is a good thing as they are relatively simple cars (assuming petrol?). The MOT history is also a positive because a C-Max of that age certainly has the potential for rust issues. The thing I'd be most concerned about is the timing belt and I'd be reluctant to buy without knowing when that was last done. If the seller can't tell you that, I'd either be wanting a bigger saving in order you can get it done ASAP, or them changing it before you buy.

Good cars though, SUV height, plenty of interior space and a big boot. They also drive well for a taller vehicle.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Chris M

Engine? Mileage? Dealer or private sale.

The diesels had some issues but the petrols were pretty good. I had a 1.8 petrol which was chain, not belt.

A dealer will have cleaned the car to within an inch of it's life thereby hiding many of the tell tale signs of a neglected car. As previously mentioned, a matching set of reasonable quality tyres may give a clue to a cared for car.

Edited by Chris M on 23/11/2023 at 20:53

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

Actually, in my experience of looking at cars recently, C-Max/S-max, dealers are absolutely useless at cleaning car interiors, particularly the seats, which are often stained or grubby. I avoid these like the plague. I'll be checking tyres to ascertain whether or not they are ditch finder variety.

This isn't a diesel, they've been eliminated from my selection process.

Carried out a CarVertical check and it's all good.

Edited by Random on 23/11/2023 at 21:24

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - SLO76
I’d expect to find some receipts at least after 15yrs on the road, but at this age and money condition is all important. Ten minutes spent looking over the car should reveal if it’s seen a workshop ramp regularly enough.

What engine is in it? The 1.6 petrol is the best bet, the Mazda L series 1.8 can use a bit of oil, but weirdly the 2.0 version of the same engine is less prone to this for some reason. Rust underneath is the biggest worry. If it’s solid, and otherwise starts quietly and quickly and then drives well without knocks and clunks then they’re generally good news. Mechanically they’re not expensive to maintain or repair.
Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

SLO, 1.8 petrol. Had a MK1 Focus 1.8 petrol, was very happy with it bar heater matrix failing.

I think 2.0 is in a higher VED bracket, IIRC.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - catsdad

If you get the V5 number you can check the MoT “location” on the govt MOT history site. It might give you a reassuringly small number of places where it’s been MOT’d and you might be able to make some calls to ask if they serviced it.
Not conclusive, but it might give you clues either way. If they are prepared to tell you.
Having said that, at 15 years old, it will be a rare car with anything like a fsh so you may just have to go on condition.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Andrew-T

I'd assume the lack of service history is because it has been lost?.

In my rather limited 60-year history of car buying, I can recall few, if any, instances of traders including what we might call a FSH with a used car. One is fairly lucky to get a stamped-up service record book. Only private sellers (some of them) keep a complete file of work done on their car.

My most recent purchase was a 1991 Pug 205, which came from its original lady buyer with apparently every bill from its sale onwards. Ironically the only missing item was the service booklet, which disappeared at its 1000-mile service !

Edited by Andrew-T on 24/11/2023 at 12:24

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - edlithgow

Y'all seem oddly preoccupied with tyres, a consumable appendage.

I'd have said an inspection of tyres might tell you whether the PO shared your preoccupation, and thats about it.

Look for rust, and faults.

The timing belt change (already mentioned) is the only critical feature of the service history. Nothing else that I can think of, if neglected, is likely to suddenly kill the car, though a neglected brake fluid change might possibly kill you.

Edited by edlithgow on 24/11/2023 at 01:29

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Metropolis.
Whilst it is nice to see some premium tyres on a car, I am a bit weary of the type of seller that thinks looking after a car consists of polishing the paintwork and detailing ahead of more regular oil changes.

Edited by Metropolis. on 24/11/2023 at 07:36

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - badbusdriver

Y'all seem oddly preoccupied with tyres, a consumable appendage.

Not oddly, sensibly.

If the car is on a matching set (or at least a matching pair on each axle) of decent quality tyres, it is highly unlikely that any servicing will have been missed. On the other hand, the car sitting on four mismatched cheap tyres may not prove that servicing has been neglected, but it certainly points in that direction. Neither scenario is a given, but buying an older car is always going to involve a degree of luck, so, (especially) in the absence of a service history, the more proof that the previous owner was happy/willing to spend money on it the better.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - pd

It is a 15 year old car - does history really matter that much? It can have 5 folders of paperwork and 23 service stamps but if the clutch is slipping and it has a short MOT with issues preventing it getting another one it is probably sc***.

Does it have a long MOT? How does it drive? Is the clutch OK, engine sound good, suspension feel reasonably tight without huge clonks, is there are rust underneath? Basically, does it look and feel like a car which you stand a decent chance of getting 12-18 months motoring out of? Timing belt evidence is useful.

You can't buy a banger - and that's what it is - on paperwork or on a screen. You need to use gut instinct with the car and hope for the best.

Edited by pd on 24/11/2023 at 10:17

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - pd

Why is "sc***" which is what happens to cars at the end of their lives apparently a swear word on a motoring forum??!

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Xileno

The simple swear filter works on letters not complete words.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Steveieb

When buying my RAV 4 I was aware that the clutch didnt feel quite right but it was only when I drove it for a day that I decided I couldn’t live with it in that condition.

I took the car back to the dealer who wasn’t convinced so I asked him to take it back and eventually worked out a deal to replace it. A big job on a 4x4 .

The clutch condition is certainly something worth checking very carefully

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Andrew-T

You can't buy a banger - and that's what it is - on paperwork or on a screen. You need to use gut instinct with the car and hope for the best.

It may be a banger, but not necessarily. That's why any old car has to be inspected, and appropriate questions asked of the seller. Another useful parameter is the number of owners it has had. If only one or two, that would be a plus as it should mean the car has not been a source of aggro.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - pd

You can't buy a banger - and that's what it is - on paperwork or on a screen. You need to use gut instinct with the car and hope for the best.

It may be a banger, but not necessarily. That's why any old car has to be inspected, and appropriate questions asked of the seller. Another useful parameter is the number of owners it has had. If only one or two, that would be a plus as it should mean the car has not been a source of aggro.

Not necessarily. Sometimes a low number of owners is a bad thing. People get bored with cars and run them into the ground. Sometimes a change of owner can mean a bit of enthusiasm, maybe a service, maybe a valet, maybe even a bit of paintwork tidied up.

You do not want to buy from a person who only changes their car after 15 years when something is horrendously wrong with it. You want to buy from someone who sells a car because they get bored of cars and fancy a change. The latter tend to change more often.

Whilst I wouldn't want a car with 12 owners in 15 years an average of 3 or 4 years is really quite fine and some of the absolute worst cars I have ever seen are older cars with 1 or 2 owners.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Andrew-T

<< Sometimes a low number of owners is a bad thing. People get bored with cars and run them into the ground. Sometimes a change of owner can mean a bit of enthusiasm, maybe a service, maybe a valet, maybe even a bit of paintwork tidied up. >>

That sounds like a glass-half-empty argument. For many years I patronised a local indie (now retired) who MoT-tested my aging privately-bought 205s. His approving description was an 'honest' car. That doesn't necessarily apply when there is evidence of paint jobs and other fixes ?

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

You can't buy a banger - and that's what it is - on paperwork or on a screen. You need to use gut instinct with the car and hope for the best.

A banger? I think not.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - edlithgow

Y'all seem oddly preoccupied with tyres, a consumable appendage.

Not oddly, sensibly.

If the car is on a matching set (or at least a matching pair on each axle) of decent quality tyres, it is highly unlikely that any servicing will have been missed. On the other hand, the car sitting on four mismatched cheap tyres may not prove that servicing has been neglected, but it certainly points in that direction. Neither scenario is a given, but buying an older car is always going to involve a degree of luck, so, (especially) in the absence of a service history, the more proof that the previous owner was happy/willing to spend money on it the better.

Nice to have, sure. But I doubt the fact that previous owners bought tyres, at a minimum, in pairs (as most people, in fact, do by default) really says much about its service history, (and TBH I rather doubt the importance of service history itself)

Giving tyres such prominence as a buying criterion implies one would or should walk away from what seems otherwise to be a good buy because its tyres dont match.

DMS.

Its hard enough to find an honest banger without inventing peripheral"seal of good housekeeping" hoops for it to jump through.

What matters is the answer to the two questions

Is it broken?

Is it rotten?

And service history says rather little about either of those.

The Skywing, rather astonishingly, had an extensive dealer service history, (the only car I've owned that had, IIRC) right up to when I bought it, and was admittedly in OK mechanical condition generally, but its brake fluid had possibly never been changed (I dunno if this is a Daihatsu service item) and the servicing dealer had not thought to advise the previous owners that it was about to die from rust (which I stopped).

For example, despite its extensive service history, the spare wheel well was half full of water, and evidently had been for quite a long time, because there was a toolkit partly dissolved in it.

Edited by edlithgow on 27/11/2023 at 22:28

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - John F

I've seen a 15 year old car for sale,......Does the condition and excellent MOT record negate the lack of service history?

Probably. The owners may have serviced it themselves but not kept notes. Many prefer to do it themselves to ensure the engine is completely drained of old oil and the correct oil and filter used for replacement. When our self-serviced Mk1 Focus was an almost worthless 15yrs old with 110,000 miles (the OP still hasn't posted the mileage) it gave us a further 6yrs and 50,000 miles usage before the rust killed it.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

Thanks for all the comments.

My plan to view it tomorrow has been scuppered by the price rising £400 overnight. I do wonder how such a seemingly well llooked after car has had the service history lost. The 1998 Fiat Coupe I bought last year went through 7 owners before me, yet all the service history, a plethora of receipts covering very single year, has been retained.

I'll bide my time on the C-Max.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Andrew-T

My plan to view it tomorrow has been scuppered by the price rising £400 overnight..

So according to your first posts, the price is about where it should be ? If it is such a good car it would still seem worth buying - or are you only interested in getting a 'bargain' ? :-)

Perhaps the trader has had a lot of interest and turned them all away ....

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - skidpan

A few comments.

When I have PX'd the last few cars the dealer did not want any receipts, just the service book or in the case of VAG cars the annual service print out. Reason is simple, data protection. In the past the V5 had the details of the last few owners (we have had buyers chasing us for bits the dealer has robbed in the past), passing details via the service receipts would not be acceptable.

For cars from the VAG stable this is not an issue providing the services are carried out within the the VAG network, the records are computerised and available by any VAG dealer (and some independents if what people say is true) but for Kia owners it is an issue since there is no central records, the dealer doing the work has the only info available, if you don't know who did the work you would be out of luck.

When we sold the Celerio about a month ago to a Suzuki dealer he did not want copies of the receipts but he did want the service book.

Because of this it does not surprise me there is no service history in an older car that has probably not seen a Ford dealer for many years. But a service book would be nice even if the work was carried out by an indy.

With regards to engines the 1.8 petrol in the C-Max was the chain cam Mazda derived unit and its an excellent motor. The 2 litre is used by Caterham in standard and tuned versions and its pretty bullet proof, would not expect the 1.8 to be any different. We drove a 1.8 when we bought our C-Max and it was a good drive but we bought a diesel because of the miles we were doing at the time.

The 1.8 mentioned by the OP that was in his Mk1 Focus was a totally different engine that was 100% Ford designed and produced (had links back to the CVH from the 80's - some racers make what they call a ZVH which is a CVH head on a Zetec block when the regs require the original number of cams/valves. Makes for a more reliable 2 litre XR2 or XR3i than an overbore on the CVH block). It was belt cam. Have a 2 litre one in my Caterham, been in there for almost 16 years now and other than a cam belt change, one set of spark plus, plenty of oil changes and plenty of enthusiastic use its not been touched. Its due another cam belt this winter (the engine was 2004 production).

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Andrew-T

When I have PX'd the last few cars the dealer did not want any receipts, just the service book or in the case of VAG cars the annual service print out. Reason is simple, data protection..

Yes, that illustrates one way the world has changed in the 21st century. Before that we learnt that spare service books could easily be found and stamped up, and a sheaf of receipts was better evidence of a car's history. So in a way we are back where we were.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - catsdad
Suzuki still uses service booklets. Our three year old Vitara's was missing at sale but the car had been serviced by the selling dealer since new. They issued a duplicate completed up to date book and gave us print outs of its three services with the obligatory heavy pen through the name and address.
Given that both blank Suzuki service books and fake "dealer" rubber stamps are readily available it would be easy to create a false history. As it used to be for all cars in the past.
My main car is a Golf and my indie can input online what he has done but can't retrieve the previous VW history. Bit petty of VW but I think they will print a full history off if you visit a dealer. By the time I sell it it won't matter and in any case I have all receipts.
Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - RT

My 2016 VW Touareg still uses a service book which defines what has or hasn't been done - when subject to VW service plan the dealer invoices VW not the owner so no detailed invoice.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Big John

My 2016 VW Touareg still uses a service book which defines what has or hasn't been done - when subject to VW service plan the dealer invoices VW not the owner so no detailed invoice.

My 2014 Skoda Superb didn't have a service book - I got a printout of its service record after every service. When I stopped using the main dealer after a few years I bought a blank service book and stapled the last printout in the front and my trusty local independent has stamped the book thereafter.

Edited by Big John on 24/11/2023 at 22:57

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - madf

I would inspect the underneath especially sills ,inner sills and rear suspension VERY carefully for rust. Recent underseal is evidence of possible quick fix/hiding rust/. I would run away if found.

I diy, keep receipts and write up the service book..Mind you running Honda/Toyotas most entries are mundane servicing. very few repairs needed. Sorry : wrong: virtually none.

A good guide for older cars: does everything work properly? EVERYTHING> If no, then probably neglected and runaway job. People who don't repair easy jobs (bulbs/wipers) are unlikely to spend on major repairs.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

The vendor now has a Cyber Monday Deal on it claiming the RRP to be £450 more than the asking price, but the 'Limited Time Offer' SALE to this Saturday allows you to save £450 in that time period. A load of t*** as the price the last couple of days was the lower price.This smacks of shonky business. I wonder what trading standards would have to say about it.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - SLO76

The vendor now has a Cyber Monday Deal on it claiming the RRP to be £450 more than the asking price, but the 'Limited Time Offer' SALE to this Saturday allows you to save £450 in that time period. A load of t*** as the price the last couple of days was the lower price.This smacks of shonky business. I wonder what trading standards would have to say about it.

Welcome to the motor trade.
Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - badbusdriver

The vendor now has a Cyber Monday Deal on it claiming the RRP to be £450 more than the asking price, but the 'Limited Time Offer' SALE to this Saturday allows you to save £450 in that time period. A load of t*** as the price the last couple of days was the lower price.This smacks of shonky business. I wonder what trading standards would have to say about it.

While the price changes are dubious, it is still a cheap car. There aren't going to be that many C-Max's of that age in the condition described, so maybe still worth buying?

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - Random

I'm moving towards a 1.8TDCi fully aware of the risks in doing so.

Immaculate, with excellent MOT history, no SH - FoxyJukebox
Assuming MOT history really is “excellent” , then look at how well maintained simple essentials like windscreen wipers, tyre condition( walls/tread), spare tyre if it exists, bulbs, indicators , every dashboard light that’s rightly on .
Basically, do your own common sense test drive /mot.-but as others are pointing out, there is ever the evil of rust but quite frankly-I’d take a risk and go for it