The conspiracy theories seem to be getting tinged with paranoia .... :-)
It appears that those saying anything on the other side of a decate is now called a 'conspiracy theory' (read facts or opinion that mostly gets proven a few months or year or two away) by a certain group of individuals who cannot find any way of refuting those arguments and because it requires no work.
Stating what you did could also easily be called gaslighting, exactly to make people feel paranoid.
All this needs to stop.
Surely, Andy, you understand that:
1. If you keep expressing opinions that are completely different to the general consensus
The 'general consensus' isn't the majority of people commenting on a thread. As I've said before, many people have views that agree with this supposed 'minority' but don't air them precisely because they fear what you and others do to me just because I have a different viewpoint to you.
Besides, a minority viewpoint doesn't necessarily equal a 'comspiracy theory'.
2. If you keep alluding to, but not naming groups or individuals who are secretly controlling everything
I have named people and organisations who I think are pulling strings to various degrees.
3. If you ignore all information sources that don't agree with your opinion
You rarely name any actual documents. On the rare occasion someone does, they do not stand up to scruitny.
4. If you claim that the majority are don't understand reality because they have been misled by the media, which has somehow been infiltrated by people whose opinions you don't like
They don't need to b e'infiltrated - just either scare and/or bribed - even without being explicitly told. You don't think that, for example, The Gates Foundation's millions that went to the Gauradian and telegraph didn't come with strings attached, do you?
Or similarly to most MSM outlets with government ad cash during the pandemic? For that matter, do you think that ANY organisation or firm would continue to give ad reveneue to papers that reported on their many misdeeds and/or bad products over the decades?
That's the reason why many of us flocked to this website, because it didn't mince its words on reviews.
5. You keep talking about a global plan to force people into serfdom and make them eat insects.
Funny - I thought that's exactly what governments worldwide are current doing, via spending - > inflation, green policies, etc. The EU has just allowed bugz to be used in food production, after decades of supposedly trying to ensure they aren't in food.
Besides, its all on the WEF's website (remeber the video about owning nothing, living in the pod, eating ze bigz [no meat] and will be happy by 2030?) and in the UN's Agenda 30 documentation, which has been signed up to by all major politicians of all mainstream hues.
6. You chuck around meaningless words like globalist and accuse anyone left of centre of Stalinism.
Nope - please show me when I've used that word, with links. I'd call a good few 'socialists' (something that Brompt just admitted further up - though he says he's 'more moderate' than I think he either is or believes, but that's just opinion) on here, or maybe globalist apologists is a more apt term.
Firstly, the majority of people are going to disagree and some will get quite vocal. Secondly, you will be labelled a conspiracy theorist because, frankly, you are theorising that there is a conspiracy.
More gaslighting. I wish you would be frank, rather than going in for that Blairite gaslighting stuff all the time. What do YOU really want? What are your political alleigances? Do you believe in those policies I spoke of, or don't you care because you'll not be around by then?
|
