What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - HGV ~ P Valentine

Lower motorway speed limits to 64mph and ban driving in cities on Sundays: MPs call for drastic measures to slash fuel use and oil imports in new report (msn.com)

Hello one and all.

First and foremost let me wish you all a happy new year, have a great year.

I wont spoil it but seriously, just when you thought the gov could not come up with an even more stupid idea then previous ones, you might read this with utter disbelief.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Bromptonaut

Spoiler: It's not the government.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Maxime.

Actually, we agree. We live very close to a busy town road and would appreciate a respite from the traffic on sundays.

For the speed limits they could be lower, agree with that too.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Crickleymal

Can't say it bothers me much either.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - alan1302

I wont spoil it but seriously, just when you thought the gov could not come up with an even more stupid idea then previous ones, you might read this with utter disbelief.

What is that stupid about it though?

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - gordonbennet

Excellent idea about cutting traffic in cities on Sundays, i suggest go one further and ban Sunday trading completely as it was not so long ago and give those who are compelled to work on Sundays their family lives back.

We had blanket 50mph limit back in the 70's imposed due to the oil shortage, can't see a reduction of 6 mph making a great deal of difference to overal fuel use but it gave the article a chance to point the finger at Russia for extra brownie points, where's the face palm smiley when you need it.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Smileyman

nothing wrong with Sunday trading, and it's not all day either. Perhaps mandate the hours too? Anyway, what is the difference between a shop being open, or a cinema, or a sports stadium? All employ staff!

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - alan1302

Excellent idea about cutting traffic in cities on Sundays, i suggest go one further and ban Sunday trading completely as it was not so long ago and give those who are compelled to work on Sundays their family lives back.

Surprised you want the government controlling what people can and can't do on a Sunday.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - mcb100
64mph is an odd figure. Presumably based on a projected target of being x% more efficient than 70mph.
It’s not like it’s an obvious figure in kmh either.
Either way, I can’t see it being a big (hypothetical) issue as it probably won’t lower the average speed of a motorway journey by much.
long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - mcb100
Thinking about it further, I’m assuming that HGV limits would also be coming by a commensurate (hypothetical) amount?
And seeing as it’s an initiative to lessen our reliance on imported petrol & diesel, and to lower emissions, we should be able to keep the speed limit for EV’s at 70, shouldn’t we?
long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - sammy1

Can you imagine the boredom doing 64mph for mile after mile. Motorway traffic today is 70 with a lot of drivers doing quite a bit more. I am not convinced that lower speed limits are any safer. Miles of motorway road works at 50 mph are frustrating for many with cars travelling far too close together. On the M4 in Wales there are two compulsory 50 limits monitored by speed cameras. This causes bunching and there are frequent bumps adding to even more delays. It also makes changing lanes and joining the Mway more difficult

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - bathtub tom

Like GB, I recall the 50MPH motorway speed limit in the '70s. Made very little difference to a journey I regularly made at the time of 120 miles, perhaps adding less then ten minutes on a two hour journey. Saved a lot of fuel!

64MPH is 103KPH (100KPH).

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - alan1302

Can you imagine the boredom doing 64mph for mile after mile.

Can't see driving 6mph would make that much difference - I find driving a bit below 70mph more relaxing anyway. Good thing your not a HGV driver they have to drive even slower.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - galileo

Can you imagine the boredom doing 64mph for mile after mile.

Can't see driving 6mph would make that much difference - I find driving a bit below 70mph more relaxing anyway. Good thing your not a HGV driver they have to drive even slower.

Highways England live traffic flow at this moment shows that speeds on M62 are mostly between 59 and 61, there are a couple of stretches where it reaches 66 on one carriageway.

M1 speeds are from 57 to 70, but mostly in mid 60s, similar for M6, not much of M25 running above 65.

Since most car speedos over-read by at least 2 mph, few drivers observing a 70 limit are actually travelling at 70 anyway

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Engineer Andy

Can you imagine the boredom doing 64mph for mile after mile.

Can't see driving 6mph would make that much difference - I find driving a bit below 70mph more relaxing anyway. Good thing your not a HGV driver they have to drive even slower.

It depends upon the road and time of day you're driving. 60mph on a dual carriageway with almost no big HGVs is fine; not so much 'fun' when its a busy motorway with loads of HGVs, because it means driving in 'their' lane with them right up ye rear end most of the time or having to constantly overtake when they slow down going uphill.

Driving at the slower speed certainly makes a decent amount of difference to the mpg on most cars as well, especially smaller petrol-engined ones, though keeping a constant speed can also make a positive difference in that regard as well.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Andrew-T

Can you imagine the boredom doing 64mph for mile after mile. Motorway traffic today is 70 with a lot of drivers doing quite a bit more.

Don't need to, I usually do 60-65 on any M'way, it's just enough to get by HGVs, and I'm not bothered if most other drivers go past. But I don't spend many hours doing that, so it doesn't worry me.

I find M'ways intrinsically boring anyway, whatever the speed. As I usually have the time I prefer to avoid them and use A roads, so I am grateful to the M'ways taking traffic away. I don't think drivers should relieve boredom by going faster ....

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - sammy1

"""Don't need to, I usually do 60-65 on any M'way, it's just enough to get by HGVs, and I'm not bothered if most other drivers go past. But I don't spend many hours doing that, so it doesn't worry me.""

You are of course entitled to do this speed on the Mway However crawling past HGVs for long distances in the overtaking lanes is not a very good way to drive on a Mway especially if it is busy.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Andrew-T

You are of course entitled to do this speed on the Mway However crawling past HGVs for long distances in the overtaking lanes is not a very good way to drive on a Mway especially if it is busy.

Don't be silly, Sammy. You are making a false assumption that I don't speed up while passing an HGV - it probably takes me typically about 10 seconds, after which I settle back to my preferred cruising speed. Unlike other HGVs my car has no speed limiter. I usually see no need to drive faster - certainly not to relieve boredom - and it saves me a bit of fuel. I definitely don't intend to create a rolling road block.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Engineer Andy

You are of course entitled to do this speed on the Mway However crawling past HGVs for long distances in the overtaking lanes is not a very good way to drive on a Mway especially if it is busy.

Don't be silly, Sammy. You are making a false assumption that I don't speed up while passing an HGV - it probably takes me typically about 10 seconds, after which I settle back to my preferred cruising speed. Unlike other HGVs my car has no speed limiter. I usually see no need to drive faster - certainly not to relieve boredom - and it saves me a bit of fuel. I definitely don't intend to create a rolling road block.

On some roads, you'll be overtaking quite a bit, and probably p'ing off quite a lot of other road users if you overtake at 60-65mph, even in the middle lane. When there's a 'train' of HGVs, they often drive very close together, meaning you take a big risk if you slot into a (small) gap, as there is often still a gap in speed between one lorry and another.

It was the big downside when I owned my mid 90s 1L Micra - drive at 70mph and the noise would go up several notches (at 4500-5000rpm) and the mpg drops quite a bit, or run the gauntlet as you describe amongst the lorries and occasionally overtake, which would take some planning, given the lack of acceleration in 5th...

Not so bad in a bigger car with a lot more grunt that also doesn't get easily buffeted around at high speed and in the wind.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Andrew-T

"""Don't need to, I usually do 60-65 on any M'way, it's just enough to get by HGVs, and I'm not bothered if most other drivers go past. But I don't spend many hours doing that, so it doesn't worry me.""

You are of course entitled to do this speed on the Mway However crawling past HGVs for long distances in the overtaking lanes is not a very good way to drive on a Mway especially if it is busy.

My earlier words may have misled one or two - perhaps I should have written 60-65 is just enough to get away from HGVs. OK ?

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Smileyman

the proposals are maddening, for less busy times the speed limit on motorways should be raised to 80mph (except like France not on wet roads) and a minimum speed enforced so to reduce the speed differential between fastest and slowest moving vehicles. As for Sundays, perhaps ban all commercial traffic in towns & cities but not private cars.

Edited by Smileyman on 05/01/2023 at 23:31

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Big John

64mph - funny potential limit. Surely it should be a speed that's clearly shown on a UK speedometer -or is this a European km speed (100kph?)

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - expat

A few years back I was in Java and they had a ban on city traffic on the main roads for about 3 hours on Sunday mornings. It was lovely. Lots of people out with their children strolling about in the middle of what was usually chaotic traffic. One street had a band playing and others had street food stalls. It wasn't just Jakarta either. I saw it in Solo also.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - ExA35Owner

Interesting. I remember the oil crisis speed limits, too. I have a regular motorway journey; usually not under time pressure. The difference between driving at an indicated 65mph and an indicated 73mph (so likely 63 and 70 true speeds) is remarkable on fuel consumption.

Reducing overall petrol/diesel consumption could be achieved by (a) reducing and enforcing speed limits (b) taxing fuel more heavily (c) taxing high-consumption vehicles more (d) imposing maximum fuel consumption values on manufacturers' output. All have been tried and all work to some extent.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Andrew-T

Reducing overall petrol/diesel consumption could be achieved by ... (c) taxing high-consumption vehicles more ...

That already happens, by definition !

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - gordonbennet

Reducing overall petrol/diesel consumption could be achieved by ... (c) taxing high-consumption vehicles more ...

That already happens, by definition !

Indeed, and its part of the reason the hated by many double cab pick up has gained such popularity in general use with people who require a large 4x4 but who don't have the bottomless pockets of Range Rover buyers and/or don't wish to be stung for excessive VED or whatever they call it every year.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Adampr

Toyota Invincible - £40k to buy, 30mpg, £260 VED.

Toyota Rav4 - £36k to buy, 50 mpg, £165 VED.

Unless you need a pickup, there isn't a rational reason to buy one

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - John F

Yet another example of the emanations from people who enjoy telling other people how they must behave and who would probably delight in working for an authoritarian centralised autocracy. I shall continue to enjoy my choice of driving a 20mpg gas guzzler with the cruise control set at a minimum of 70mph when safe to do so.

What i would really like to see is a ban on HGVs on Sundays. If that results in deliveries a day or two late and the occasional unavailability of avocados, so be it.

Edited by John F on 06/01/2023 at 11:19

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - gordonbennet

What i would really like to see is a ban on HGVs on Sundays. If that results in deliveries a day or two late and the occasional unavailability of avocados, so be it.

It will result in bread and other food more vital food shortages John, there's only so much storage for main ingredienst in such intensive production facilities.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - madf

When we import half our food, stopping HGV traffic on Sundays is going to ensure bigger traffic jams on Saturdays and Mondays.. especially round the ports..

Logistics in summer for perishable foods suggest price increases as well.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - RT

Yet another example of the emanations from people who enjoy telling other people how they must behave and who would probably delight in working for an authoritarian centralised autocracy. I shall continue to enjoy my choice of driving a 20mpg gas guzzler with the cruise control set at a minimum of 70mph when safe to do so.

What i would really like to see is a ban on HGVs on Sundays. If that results in deliveries a day or two late and the occasional unavailability of avocados, so be it.

HGV traffic is much lighter on Saturdays and Sundays - for our caravanning trips to the Highlands, we leave Saturday afternoon, stay Saturday night in Southern Scotland and then carry on Sunday morning - we see very few HGVs so can cruise at 60 in lane 1 while cars can overtake unimpeded in lane 2

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - alan1302

What i would really like to see is a ban on HGVs on Sundays. If that results in deliveries a day or two late and the occasional unavailability of avocados, so be it.

Why? It would result in late deliveries of a lot more important items than Avocados.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - gordonbennet

Toyota Invincible - £40k to buy, 30mpg, £260 VED.

Toyota Rav4 - £36k to buy, 50 mpg, £165 VED.

Unless you need a pickup, there isn't a rational reason to buy one

Rav 4 isn't the equivalent of a Hilux Invincible (the top spec) , Landcruiser is and costing upwards of £45k comes with a rather more eye watering tax penalty for several years.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Adampr

Toyota Invincible - £40k to buy, 30mpg, £260 VED.

Toyota Rav4 - £36k to buy, 50 mpg, £165 VED.

Unless you need a pickup, there isn't a rational reason to buy one

Rav 4 isn't the equivalent of a Hilux Invincible (the top spec) , Landcruiser is and costing upwards of £45k comes with a rather more eye watering tax penalty for several years.

We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I think, a RAV4 is as spacious, comfortable and well-equipped as an Invincible. It's just missing the massive bin on the back.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - gordonbennet

Its also missing a tough ladder chassis off road size tyres long travel suspension a proper 4WD system and 1500+kg in towing capacity, but yes we'll differ on what constitutes a 4x4 compared to an AWD SUV.

Edited by gordonbennet on 06/01/2023 at 14:21

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - badbusdriver

"""Don't need to, I usually do 60-65 on any M'way, it's just enough to get by HGVs, and I'm not bothered if most other drivers go past. But I don't spend many hours doing that, so it doesn't worry me.""

You are of course entitled to do this speed on the Mway However crawling past HGVs for long distances in the overtaking lanes is not a very good way to drive on a Mway especially if it is busy

So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - galileo

"""Don't need to, I usually do 60-65 on any M'way, it's just enough to get by HGVs, and I'm not bothered if most other drivers go past. But I don't spend many hours doing that, so it doesn't worry me.""

You are of course entitled to do this speed on the Mway However crawling past HGVs for long distances in the overtaking lanes is not a very good way to drive on a Mway especially if it is busy

So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?

I personally don't spend longer than necessary alongside HGVs, especially LHD ones for which I may be in a blind spot. Once well past I can move back and resume my usual 60 - 65.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - gordonbennet

A tip for you about HGVs.

Those trucks still fitted with mirrors, you can see the driver as you approach from behind before committing to being alongside (Galileo is right about especially avoiding LHD trucks), if the driver is wearing a hivis whilst driving expect the worse is my advice, i've been doing the job all my adult life trust me on this.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - sammy1

"So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?""

The advice because that's all it is is not to spend all day overtaking HGVs

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - badbusdriver

"So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?""

The advice because that's all it is is not to spend all day overtaking HGVs

Who's advice is this?. If it is official, maybe you could point out in the Highway Code where it says that you should speed up in order not to hinder drivers wishing to go no slower than the speed limit?

"all day overtaking HGVs"?

Most HGV's (LGV's these days) are limited to 56mph, and an articulated truck is approx 16 meters long. At 60mph you would take less than 9 seconds to cover the length of the truck. At 65mph it would take around 4 seconds.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - sammy1

"So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?""

The advice because that's all it is is not to spend all day overtaking HGVs

Who's advice is this?. If it is official, maybe you could point out in the Highway Code where it says that you should speed up in order not to hinder drivers wishing to go no slower than the speed limit?

"all day overtaking HGVs"?

Most HGV's (LGV's these days) are limited to 56mph, and an articulated truck is approx 16 meters long. At 60mph you would take less than 9 seconds to cover the length of the truck. At 65mph it would take around 4 seconds.

"So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?""

The advice because that's all it is is not to spend all day overtaking HGVs

Who's advice is this?. If it is official, maybe you could point out in the Highway Code where it says that you should speed up in order not to hinder drivers wishing to go no slower than the speed limit?

"all day overtaking HGVs"?

Most HGV's (LGV's these days) are limited to 56mph, and an articulated truck is approx 16 meters long. At 60mph you would take less than 9 seconds to cover the length of the truck. At 65mph it would take around 4 seconds.

Ditto SLO 76 answer sheer common sense HGVs are bigger than cars and some cars just sit in their blind spots

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - alan1302

"So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?""

The advice because that's all it is is not to spend all day overtaking HGVs

Who's advice is this?. If it is official, maybe you could point out in the Highway Code where it says that you should speed up in order not to hinder drivers wishing to go no slower than the speed limit?

"all day overtaking HGVs"?

Most HGV's (LGV's these days) are limited to 56mph, and an articulated truck is approx 16 meters long. At 60mph you would take less than 9 seconds to cover the length of the truck. At 65mph it would take around 4 seconds.

"So someone who wants to do 70+mph on the motorway is more important and should have a greater priority than someone wishing to do 60-65mph?""

The advice because that's all it is is not to spend all day overtaking HGVs

Who's advice is this?. If it is official, maybe you could point out in the Highway Code where it says that you should speed up in order not to hinder drivers wishing to go no slower than the speed limit?

"all day overtaking HGVs"?

Most HGV's (LGV's these days) are limited to 56mph, and an articulated truck is approx 16 meters long. At 60mph you would take less than 9 seconds to cover the length of the truck. At 65mph it would take around 4 seconds.

Ditto SLO 76 answer sheer common sense HGVs are bigger than cars and some cars just sit in their blind spots

Think poster was saying they would not be going slowly when over taking but speeding up to overtake before slowing back down to their cruising along speed so no danger of sitting in a HGVs blindspot.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - edlithgow

I used to drive quite slow on mways to save fuel. This meant I was usually in the slow lane with the HGV's, hopefully getting some slight slipstream advantage, though tailgating them would have been too uncomfortable for both of us.

Unfortunately the "Knights of the Road" won't tolerate it. Even though we are all moving at the same speed, having a car in front somehow isn't acceptable.

If you leave a safeish gap, they will overtake you into it, forcing you to drop back, then rinse and repeat for the next lorry in line.

Try it sometime. I bet you it hasn't changed.

Bit irritating, but not nearly as bad as Taiwanese truckers, who someone once observed should be beaten with baseball bats every 6 months as a condition of retaining a commercial license.

Edited by edlithgow on 06/01/2023 at 23:34

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - SLO76
Hope this doesn’t come to pass - I doubt it would anyway. It’s annoying enough driving a large vehicle that’s limited to 62mph when you encounter the occasional i**** who insists on sitting at 61/62mph in their car, speeding up when I pull out to overtake, then slowing down again when I pull in. This often goes on for mile after mile, instead of the rational person either speeding up to get out of my road or slowing down to let me past. The last thing you want is 20 tonnes of loaded up coach sitting behind or beside you for miles and the last thing I want is more of the 61/62mph brigade clogging up the road. It would largely be ignored anyway.


long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - badbusdriver

Ditto SLO 76 answer sheer common sense HGVs are bigger than cars and some cars just sit in their blind spots

Not sure why you quoted my post (twice?) seeing as you didn't address either the question or point within it?. No mention was made by of sitting in the overtaking lane doing more or less exactly the same speed as the truck, it was someone doing 60-65mph vs a truck doing 56mph.

I'll try again though, a car doing 65mph comes upon a convoy of 6 articulated trucks doing the 56mph they are limited to and with half a truck length between them. Assuming the car pulls out half a truck length behind the one on the back and pulls in half a truck length past the one on the front, it will have been 'blocking' the overtaking lane for a grand total of around 40 seconds. Just how much of an inconvenience do you feel this will have caused for those much more important 70+mph drivers?.

Blind spots and risk?, you may well be at more of a risk passing a LHD truck, but even then I think the risk is being massively exaggerated unless the car driver has come up as far as being level with a point slightly ahead of the cab door and decided to stay there. It would also require a truck driver who is not really paying much attention to his/her surroundings.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Xileno

There was many years ago in this forum a Sticky thread written by a HGV driver that explained some of the issues that HGV drivers face and why they may do certain things on the road that car drivers might not understand. It's been deleted unfortunately. It might even have been written by GB?

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Andrew-T

<< It would also require a truck driver who is not really paying much attention to his/her surroundings. >>

I think there may be more than a few of these, if the number of HGVs one can find drifting into the hard shoulder is any guide ?

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Engineer Andy

<< It would also require a truck driver who is not really paying much attention to his/her surroundings. >>

I think there may be more than a few of these, if the number of HGVs one can find drifting into the hard shoulder is any guide ?

And drifting across the lane generally, which is why the advice is to overtake them as quickly as possible.

I experienced a rather nasty incident back in 2006 not long after I'd bought my current car, where I was getting on the M11 and an HGV driver forgot I was there and just pulled over from the middle lane, forcing me to dive onto the hard shoulder. Scared the living daylights out of me.

I'm just glad I didn't have to do that on a non-shoulder 'smart' motorway.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - John F

A frequent problem for the long suffering car driver is a long line of trucks doing 56mph and one selfish truck driver whose cruise control (presumably) is 0.5 mph faster than the long line. On a dual carriageway like the A14 this driver might cross a couple of counties mostly in the outside lane as he slowly grinds past, perhaps occasionally pulling in but almost immediately forcing them (usually 'him')self out again. After about an hour he has gained about half a mile/half a minute, but caused a cumulative total of probably many hours of delay of the thousands of cars behind him.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - veloceman
HGVs aren’t allowed on the roads on a Sunday in Germany I believe.
long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Bromptonaut
HGVs aren’t allowed on the roads on a Sunday in Germany I believe.

Restricted in France too I believe.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Engineer Andy

A frequent problem for the long suffering car driver is a long line of trucks doing 56mph and one selfish truck driver whose cruise control (presumably) is 0.5 mph faster than the long line. On a dual carriageway like the A14 this driver might cross a couple of counties mostly in the outside lane as he slowly grinds past, perhaps occasionally pulling in but almost immediately forcing them (usually 'him')self out again. After about an hour he has gained about half a mile/half a minute, but caused a cumulative total of probably many hours of delay of the thousands of cars behind him.

That road is an absolute nighmare in that regard. The number of times I've been in a long line of traffic behind an HGV overtaking others at +1mph on the run between Huntingdon and the start of the M11 just outside Cambridge, or further along near Bury St. Edmunds...daft thing is they have the room to bump it up to three lanes for most of that road and never have, despite high traffic levels and frequent accidents being recorded for decades now.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - SLO76
“ A frequent problem for the long suffering car driver is a long line of trucks doing 56mph and one selfish truck driver whose cruise control (presumably) is 0.5 mph faster than the long line.”

The selfish one is the driver of the vehicle or vehicles he’s overtaking. If a coach has the legs over mine and pulls out to overtake, i’ll lift off for a few seconds to let them past as quickly as possible. Buses are on a tight schedule usually and trucks often have delivery windows or a ferry to catch.
long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Big John
“ A frequent problem for the long suffering car driver is a long line of trucks doing 56mph and one selfish truck driver whose cruise control (presumably) is 0.5 mph faster than the long line.” The selfish one is the driver of the vehicle or vehicles he’s overtaking. If a coach has the legs over mine and pulls out to overtake, i’ll lift off for a few seconds to let them past as quickly as possible. Buses are on a tight schedule usually and trucks often have delivery windows or a ferry to catch.

I always thought the holdup on a 2 lane dual carriage way was due to slight differences in the 56mph speed limiters of HGVs - hence the slow overtake speed differential.

However what really upsets the apple cart is a vehicle cruising at less that 56 mph. I was once a passenger with a family member who I quickly realised shouldn't be driving any more who was cruising at 45mph on the A1 - it was causing chaos behind us and I really didn't feel safe. I suggested a comfort break stop and volunteered to drive after that!!

Edited by Big John on 07/01/2023 at 23:40

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - badbusdriver
“ A frequent problem for the long suffering car driver is a long line of trucks doing 56mph and one selfish truck driver whose cruise control (presumably) is 0.5 mph faster than the long line.” The selfish one is the driver of the vehicle or vehicles he’s overtaking. If a coach has the legs over mine and pulls out to overtake, i’ll lift off for a few seconds to let them past as quickly as possible. Buses are on a tight schedule usually and trucks often have delivery windows or a ferry to catch.

If the driver of the bus, coach or truck being overtaken is on a very tight schedule, is it really being selfish of them not to lift off to allow others to pass who's limiters allow an extra mph or two?.

Seems a bit of a contradiction to me. If the extra mph or two allowed by the limiter is going to make or break the schedule of the driver doing the overtaking, it also stands to reason that lifting off several times during the course of a journey to allow others to pass could also make or break the schedule of the driver being overtaken.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Andrew-T

<< If the driver of the bus, coach or truck being overtaken is on a very tight schedule, is it really being selfish of them not to lift off to allow others to pass who's limiters allow an extra mph or two?.>>

OK, let's assume that the coach lifts off from governed 56mph by 2mph to 54, allowing an overtake in (say) 30 secs, and shortening the rolling roadblock. The overtake will take a little over half a mile to complete, which should be enough.

That coach will have added precisely 1.2 seconds to its journey, so even if the driver allowed 50 such overtakes the total delay would be about 1 minute, which in the overall picture is pretty insignificant !

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Engineer Andy
“ A frequent problem for the long suffering car driver is a long line of trucks doing 56mph and one selfish truck driver whose cruise control (presumably) is 0.5 mph faster than the long line.” The selfish one is the driver of the vehicle or vehicles he’s overtaking. If a coach has the legs over mine and pulls out to overtake, i’ll lift off for a few seconds to let them past as quickly as possible. Buses are on a tight schedule usually and trucks often have delivery windows or a ferry to catch.

I suppose that the problem is when a line of similar HGVs overtakes one slightly slower one - does that vehicle drop another few mph for the couple minutes every time this happens? They might be then behind schedule.

Maybe this stems from speedos / tachos not being quite the same in accuracy and drivers and employers insisting they drive right at the maximum they are allowed to.

What really doesn't help is that:

1. Many of these probelms occur on over-burdened dual carriageways, like the A14. Many of these roads are effectively the only viable route for HGVs from one area / port to another.

Governments / mainstream political parties over all stripes have known this for decades and yet have done next to nothing, despite viable solutions being there, including the land to widen them to at least give one lane for faster vehicle to overtake the overtaking HGVs.

2. Selfish or unsuitable drivers (not just of HGVs), where that be those who drive too slowly (well below the speed limit for the conditions) on dual carriageways or motorways, especially when overtaking, when they are able to do so faster.

Middle-lane hogs or people who insist on driving at 70mph in the outside (fast) lane when they other lane(s) are empty, requiring others to either stay behind, getting more and more frustrated, or undertake, which in many cases might be still illegal, or could be dangerous because others may not anticipate it.

Many people still don't understand that for unsigned dual cariageways with a central reservation, 70mph is the speed limit, not 60. Many will also suddenly drop from 70+ to just under 60 when they reach a speed cameria because of this, which is actually far worse than those just (consistently) driving at a slower speed.

Sadly too many people have learned bad habits or are 'occasional' (they used to be called 'Sunday') drivers who make up the majority of this grouping. This also includes a good many people who are not physically / medically fit to drive but whose condition often slips past their GP (where intentionally or not), meaning they only are if and when they have a reportable incident.

They or anyone else will be very unlucky if they are stopped, let alone prosecuted by Plod for such poor driving behaviour unless an actual serious accident occurs, which just makes it more likely for the poor driving to happen.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - mcb100
I believe the discrepancy between truck speed limiters can be down to tyre wear.
Get the calibration done on old tyres (smaller overall diameter), then put new ones on and gain 2mph.
long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - gordonbennet
I believe the discrepancy between truck speed limiters can be down to tyre wear. Get the calibration done on old tyres (smaller overall diameter), then put new ones on and gain 2mph.

Tyre wear is taken into account at the 2 yearly calibration date, though yes in practice if you are lucky and the vehicle gets submitted on worn tyres it genertally works out better for you, i was lucky recently.

The animosity between the drivers of different vehicle types and their faults and failings still rages, whilst those most vociferous obviously are the worlds most perfect driver, twas ever thus, i don't get inolved in such discussions any more.

Other than to say, be patient, controlled speed is on the way for everyone as the private means of motorised transport for the pleb class become public enemy number one, then those who haven't experienced the joys of speed limiters can enjoy the benefits and show those of us who have had to put with these things for 25odd years already how it should be done.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - badbusdriver

The animosity between the drivers of different vehicle types and their faults and failings still rages, whilst those most vociferous obviously are the worlds most perfect driver, twas ever thus, i don't get inolved in such discussions any more.

Other than to say, be patient, controlled speed is on the way for everyone as the private means of motorised transport for the pleb class become public enemy number one, then those who haven't experienced the joys of speed limiters can enjoy the benefits and show those of us who have had to put with these things for 25odd years already how it should be done.

Yes, the subject does crop up from time to time and highlights the self importance ("how dare someone stop me from going as fast as I want!") and lack of patience displayed by motorists who want/choose to drive at or above the speed limit, towards any driver doing less, regardless of whether through choice or because of a limiter. Truck, bus and coach drivers have to be on the road and, probably more so in the case of the truck drivers, will invariably have less time to get to where they are going than they actually need. The time pressure most of these drivers are under is tremendous and should not be underestimated. So it is completely understandably (IMO) that the notion of going any slower than the speed limiter of their vehicle will allow is to be avoided at all possible costs.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - badbusdriver

<< If the driver of the bus, coach or truck being overtaken is on a very tight schedule, is it really being selfish of them not to lift off to allow others to pass who's limiters allow an extra mph or two?.>>

OK, let's assume that the coach lifts off from governed 56mph by 2mph to 54, allowing an overtake in (say) 30 secs, and shortening the rolling roadblock. The overtake will take a little over half a mile to complete, which should be enough.

That coach will have added precisely 1.2 seconds to its journey, so even if the driver allowed 50 such overtakes the total delay would be about 1 minute, which in the overall picture is pretty insignificant !

I didn't say it would be anything other than an insignificant difference. But the same thing applies to a driver who's limiter allows them an extra mph or two choosing to overtake rather than stay behind. What is that over the course of 50 miles? a minute or two?.

What I am saying is that neither driver should feel obliged to go slower than they can and need to in order to meet a very tight schedule, just to appease a lack of patience from car drivers.

long suffering motorist - Stupid Gov Ideas - Andrew-T

<< What I am saying is that neither driver should feel obliged to go slower than they can and need to in order to meet a very tight schedule, just to appease a lack of patience from car drivers. >>

I can understand this point of view. But the fact remains that by backing off a little (with very little time lost) a rolling roadblock could last only 10-15 seconds instead of possibly minutes for quite a few following drivers prevented from passing. IMHO.