Hi all and thank you in advance.
I left my car with a local garage - the mecahnic has been alright in the past.
The car stopped turning on. It sounded like it reached the amount of revs that sound right before cutting out. Then it wouldn't manage that - transferred to the garage with an "i'm not in a rush message" as I had access to another car. I accept that I said that so can't complain too much about the time frame. I got it back 2 months later. The water pump was also leaking prior to this and needed changing.
It took some time before I was told EGR valve was sticking and inquired about the cam belt and water pump being replaced.
The part that concerns me is this;
When I asked for an update I was told the mechanic had a spare engine he was going to take parts off. When I further asked for an update I was told he was awaiting parts as the ones off another engine didn't fit and he needed to buy some in. I should have taken note at this point but I had a busy few months and it didn't register properly at the time.
I asked for an itemised bill and received a receipt stating;
Replace complete cam belt kit + water pump
Oil + filter change
Repair inlet manifold
And a price. No breakdown, parts cost, VAT, brand of kit.
I am not in to cars all that much but I trust that some people are however if I found that receipt as a person buying the car in the future I would be skeptical.
Is this the norm for garages and receipts to be so vague and to be almost a token gesture?
What can I expect a detaileed and full receipt to look like?
How should an ideal receipt be broken down?
How can I tell if the parts are new? (Any clues to look for)
Is it right for me to ask for a purchase receipt copy or equivalent for the parts bought?
|