We all have our own preferences, and that's fine. So what do you think is the best motor/car combination? I know there will be alot of people saying some sort of sbc, and that's fine too just tell why. I'll start off by saying I think the 2jz, and the 4g63 are my favorite motors ever made. Insane power/smaller packages is what really gets makes these motors special to me. What's yours?
If your question was in plain English you might get more responses
.
|
If your question was in plain English you might get more responses
Agreed, I think the OP is referring to some Japanese motor engines - I had read "motor" as referring to a car rather than its power unit ... and I don't have any qualifications for commenting on the "best" engine.
|
|
2JZ-GTE's engine code goes like this: “JZ” is just the engine family, “G” stands for performance-oriented dual overhead cam setup, “T” stands for turbocharged and “E” means its electronically fuel injected
How much horsepower does a 2jz engine have?
280 horsepower
The 2JZ-GTE camshaft specifications are as follows: duration 224/236 deg, lift 7.8/8.4 mm. Such engines developed a capacity of 280 horsepower at 5600 rpm. and had a torque of 435 Nm (320 lb•ft) at 4000 rpm.
Googled and the answer above does not mean much to me.
If you are into engine design & the finer points on camshaft specs he will not find too many (if any) interest here. IMHO
|
|
|
|
Big fan here of the 16g78x (but only the ‘Whiplash’ derivatives). The one with the turboencabulator fabricated from unobtanium.
Full details below:
The original machine had a base plate of prefabulated amulite, surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two main spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented. The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-deltoid type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots in the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a nonreversible tremmie pipe to the differential girdlespring on the "up" end of the grammeters.
Hope that clears it up.
|
Big fan here of the 16g78x (but only the ‘Whiplash’ derivatives). The one with the turboencabulator fabricated from unobtanium. Full details below: The original machine had a base plate of prefabulated amulite, surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two main spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented. The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-deltoid type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots in the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a nonreversible tremmie pipe to the differential girdlespring on the "up" end of the grammeters. Hope that clears it up.
LOL...thanks for the clarification...my only argument is that I was sure the "tremmie pipe" WAS reversible.?
|
|
Come back Professor Stanley Unwin! Where are you when needed? Ho Ho.
Cheers Concrete
|
|
|
|
thanks for the clarification...my only argument is that I was sure the "tremmie pipe" WAS reversible.?
A simple mistake to make, Nellyjak, but if you think about it you'd realise that it's only ever reversible when the collet connecting the wobble sprocket to the laughing shaft is OMITTED, and in the quoted example it's evidently there for all to see.... (just to the right of the oscillating spigot - but you already knew that).
[and in case you've lost the collet and you're unsure where to source another, then the first place to look would be Mornington Crescent]
Edited by KB. on 30/06/2020 at 16:41
|
|
Ford Corsair 1500 deluxe , great car. Not fast not economical built from special soluble steel. But had a gearbox as precise as a rifle bolt. To a young lad like me if represented freedom.
|
|
"special soluble steel"
??
|
"special soluble steel"
??
A Motor industry special product that rusted quickly to ensure repeat purchases of new cars.
Exhaust sydtems were also made of it till recently.
|
|
If I remember correctly, the previously mentioned engine had a weakness in its reverberated throsset cleaver.
Edited by Oli rag on 30/06/2020 at 18:57
|
If I remember correctly, the previously mentioned engine had a weakness in its reverberated throsset cleaver.
The Mark IX version addressed this weakness by interposing a retrocoaxial sprogget between the plungeon and the throsset cleaver, thus reducing the reverberations to a non-destructive frequency.
|
If I remember correctly, the previously mentioned engine had a weakness in its reverberated throsset cleaver.
The Mark IX version addressed this weakness by interposing a retrocoaxial sprogget between the plungeon and the throsset cleaver, thus reducing the reverberations to a non-destructive frequency.
Yeah but the Mk VIII version went from 0-60 0.4 seconds quicker.
|
If I remember correctly, the previously mentioned engine had a weakness in its reverberated throsset cleaver.
The Mark IX version addressed this weakness by interposing a retrocoaxial sprogget between the plungeon and the throsset cleaver, thus reducing the reverberations to a non-destructive frequency.
Yeah but the Mk VIII version went from 0-60 0.4 seconds quicker.
True but only if fitted with cross climates and run on shell.
|
|
|
Ford used to build all their cars with steel guaranteed to dissolve into brown flakes about ten minutes after you bought the car. Great days. Sadly they seem to have discontinued its use.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for the clarification...my only argument is that I was sure the "tremmie pipe" WAS reversible.?
A simple mistake to make, Nellyjak, but if you think about it you'd realise that it's only ever reversible when the collet connecting the wobble sprocket to the laughing shaft is OMITTED, and in the quoted example it's evidently there for all to see.... (just to the right of the oscillating spigot - but you already knew that).
[and in case you've lost the collet and you're unsure where to source another, then the first place to look would be Mornington Crescent]
Yes, I confess I'd forgotten about the wobble sprocket/collet connection...I simply wondered if the the induction exo-spironometer would invalidate the need for it and allow the frequency potentiator to re-align automatically..?
I will of course check that my collet is still in place.!
|
|
OP, I’m afraid you made the mistake of confusing this forum with one where the members are car/driving fans. Pistonheads might be a better bet for your question but in my opinion and having owned one, I would say that the engine from the Honda S2000 is right up there. Reliable 240 bhp from a NA 2.0 litre bespoke for the car was incredible. Finally to all those who did reply to the OP. Sarcastic and rude replies to a new poster isn’t really the way to encourage new members to the forum.
|
OP, I’m afraid you made the mistake of confusing this forum with one where the members are car/driving fans. Pistonheads might be a better bet for your question but in my opinion and having owned one, I would say that the engine from the Honda S2000 is right up there. Reliable 240 bhp from a NA 2.0 litre bespoke for the car was incredible. Finally to all those who did reply to the OP. Sarcastic and rude replies to a new poster isn’t really the way to encourage new members to the forum.
IMO, the OP isn't a "new" poster - he/she's an ongoing PITA who posts trash and then tries to insert spam links
|
OP, I’m afraid you made the mistake of confusing this forum with one where the members are car/driving fans. Pistonheads might be a better bet for your question but in my opinion and having owned one, I would say that the engine from the Honda S2000 is right up there. Reliable 240 bhp from a NA 2.0 litre bespoke for the car was incredible. Finally to all those who did reply to the OP. Sarcastic and rude replies to a new poster isn’t really the way to encourage new members to the forum.
IMO, the OP isn't a "new" poster - he/she's an ongoing PITA who posts trash and then tries to insert spam links
Yes, absolutely RT, and anyone needs proof of this, just look at his/her post on the 'Golf GT TDI-Log Book Issue' thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Big fan here of the 16g78x (but only the ‘Whiplash’ derivatives). The one with the turboencabulator fabricated from unobtanium. Full details below: The original machine had a base plate of prefabulated amulite, surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two main spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented. The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-deltoid type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots in the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a nonreversible tremmie pipe to the differential girdlespring on the "up" end of the grammeters. Hope that clears it up.
But you missed out what the mean piston speed is in light years per millennium!
|
|
Need to know basis *taps side of nose.
|
|
But, did anyone know that kiyolsakie6 is an outer mongolian dialect for !"I am a spammer"?
|
|
We know now, as it (not a he or she) has posted a link on the Golf thread. I've marked it as a spammer so its posts have disappeared. I'll close this thread now.
|
|
|
|
|
