What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Teshy

Hi all,

I sought some advice on a VW Touran a couple of weeks back. Since then we have changed tack with our 7 seater purchase and its currently a toss up between the Kia Carens 1.6 or the Toyota Verso 1.6 - both of which would be around 2 years old.

Having looked around the forum and site, it looks like the Verso is always hotly recommended but how do these two stack up against each other for all round reliability? The Kia would give us 5 more years of warranty and the Toyota would give us approx 3.

I personally prefer the look of the Kia but if the Toyota is miles ahead for reliable i'd probably just go for that... couple of examples i've seen:

www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/20190402654...5

www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/20190530850...5

Thanks!

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - badbusdriver

Ultimately i'd probably go for the Toyota, but i doubt there would be much in it for reliability. Just be aware with the Kia (not sure how much of a factor this is with the Toyota), it MUST have full dealer service history for the warranty to be valid. I know on paper you should legally be able to have it serviced somewhere else (as long as they use genuine parts), but in practice, they will almost certainly find a way to wiggle out of their obligations re the warranty. So, to be on the safe side, make sure it has full Kia history, and the best way to be sure of this would be to buy an 'approved used' example from a Kia dealer. I'd probably aim to do the same for the Toyota.

In terms of design, they are both of a very similar design and layout, so just have a good look at each and decide by which you like the feel of best. Maybe one has slightly more space in the rear, maybe a more comfortable drivers seat, more intuative infotainment, etc.

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - skidpan

We drove both a few years ago and compared to our C-Max (diesel) both were dreadful.

We bought a Kia but it was a Ceed diesel estate so nothing against the brand.

Tried to get a drive in a diesel Avensis but the dealer was an idiot.

They may well suit you but get a good long test drive in both.

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - MGspannerman

I believe you can buy an additional two years warranty for a Toyota, extending it from five to seven years, for an additional £500 or so. Well worth it in my view and something I intend to do. My Avensis is 3.5 years old now and going very well.

As suggested above a Toyota/Kia dealer approved used vehicle would be my preferred way forward and indeed a preference for the Toyota. We have had seven or eight now, there are three parked up outside as I write, and all have been very good.

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - badbusdriver

We drove both a few years ago and compared to our C-Max (diesel) both were dreadful.

Not much detail here(!), but i'm guessing this has to do with the lack of torque?.

It is something that you probably should bear in mind, especially if you are a 'press on' kind of driver!. Both cars are quite heavy (the Kia more so), both cars don't have a lot of torque (both being n\a or non-turbo petrol), and in both cars, what torque there is comes at quite high revs. The Toyota produces 118lb/ft @ 4400rpm, the Kia 122lb/ft @ 4850rpm. This means that if you are in a hurry, you will need to work the engines in both cars very hard indeed. By contrast, the VW Touran, even as a 1.2TSI (turbo), despite having less actual BHP than the Toyota or Kia (110BHP vs 132 and 135 respectively) produces 129lb/ft from 1400rpm. So the combination of more torque at much lower revs, mean it will be more relaxing to drive, and almost certainly more efficient. And as said, that is just the base 1.2TSI, the 1.4TSI moves things on to a different level entirely!.

Of course if you are not bothered about performance, you will probably find them perfectly adequate!.

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Falkirk Bairn

In say 3/4 years time - when the cars are some 6/7 years old the Verso would be likely to

have a higher value than a Kia - assuming similar mileages & kept in similar condition.

Likely depreciation has to be looked at carefully - in newer cars depreciation costs more per mile than petrol/diesel!

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Heidfirst

I believe you can buy an additional two years warranty for a Toyota, extending it from five to seven years, for an additional £500 or so.

You can & that price includes 2 years of Toyota Roadside Assistance worth £150 ... Subject to mileage/servicing you can keep extending a Toyota's warranty up to something like 12 years now in the UK should you so wish.

With a Toyota Extended Warranty you have to have the car serviced at a Toyota dealer though but with the 5+ Club you will get 20% off servicing & MOTs.

As for the op, I would be trying to get the 1.8 rather than the 1.6.

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - SLO76
Of the two I’d probably go for the Toyota. It’s dated but there’s a steady market for them when you come to sell on and it’ll be utterly reliable, so much so that I wouldn’t waste the money paying for an extended warranty. My Avensis is 9yrs old and has 85,000 miles up yet drives without fault.

The Kia is nicer looking but although it’ll likely be reliable they’re still viewed as disposable cars once they get past 7yrs old so it’ll be next to worthless when you flog it. Plus the 1.6 GDi is pretty gutless in such a heavy body. The Toyota is a bit slow too so drive both to see how you get on, I doubt either will give any grief.

I agree with Skidpan regarding the C-Max. It’s a much better car to drive, look at and to sit in than either of these but it’s compromised by its engine range. The older 1.6 petrol is a Yamaha design and very robust if a bit gutless but the 1.0 Ecoboost is notoriously unreliable and the 1.6 diesel has a reputation for premature failure too. It’s possible they’ve cured it with the latest downsized version the 1.5 but it’s early days. I’m fairly confident that it’ll be fine if looked after properly though. It’s worth considering on account of it being vastly better to drive.

But one of the best used 7strs is still the Vauxhall Zafira. For your budget you could get an excellent late model approved used 1.4 turbo from a main dealer. These are comfortable and vast inside. Hugely practical and if you avoid the Fiat designed diesels they’re pretty robust.

I just found a great car on Auto Trader:

www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/20190730061...7

Edited by SLO76 on 05/08/2019 at 23:20

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - skidpan

Not much detail here(!), but i'm guessing this has to do with the lack of torque?.

It is something that you probably should bear in mind, especially if you are a 'press on' kind of driver!. Both cars are quite heavy (the Kia more so), both cars don't have a lot of torque (both being n\a or non-turbo petrol), and in both cars, what torque there is comes at quite high revs. The Toyota produces 118lb/ft @ 4400rpm, the Kia 122lb/ft @ 4850rpm. This means that if you are in a hurry, you will need to work the engines in both cars very hard indeed. By contrast, the VW Touran, even as a 1.2TSI (turbo), despite having less actual BHP than the Toyota or Kia (110BHP vs 132 and 135 respectively) produces 129lb/ft from 1400rpm. So the combination of more torque at much lower revs, mean it will be more relaxing to drive, and almost certainly more efficient. And as said, that is just the base 1.2TSI, the 1.4TSI moves things on to a different level entirely!.

That was exactly what we found.

Of course if you are not bothered about performance, you will probably find them perfectly adequate!.

Nowhere near what we expected. Even in town they were hard work. At the time one of our cars was a 80 PS Nissan Micra and that was an F1 compared the Toyota and Kia.

One other thing we found on the test drive was the rear seat comfort on both was very poor compared to the C-Max. The Toyota was without doubt the worst, the seat was totally flat and even at very moderate speeds (with seat belt on) you were sliding form side to side. A long trip would have been unbearable. We also found the instrument location in the centre of the dash distracting, it did not work in the Mini so why Toyota decided it was a good idea in an MPV (probably used the Picasso as an example) god only knows.

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Heidfirst
But one of the best used 7strs is still the Vauxhall Zafira. For your budget you could get an excellent late model approved used 1.4 turbo from a main dealer. These are comfortable and vast inside. Hugely practical and if you avoid the Fiat designed diesels they’re pretty robust.

At the 2018 European Championships the bulk of the fleet consisted of 1.4 Turbo Zafiras or 1.8 Valvematic Versos. The vast majority of drivers preferred the Vauxhall as quite a few stalled the Versos due to the low torque /clutch combo (of course, as a 1.8 Valvematic Avensis driver I was used to it).

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - corax
But one of the best used 7strs is still the Vauxhall Zafira. For your budget you could get an excellent late model approved used 1.4 turbo from a main dealer. These are comfortable and vast inside. Hugely practical and if you avoid the Fiat designed diesels they’re pretty robust.

At the 2018 European Championships the bulk of the fleet consisted of 1.4 Turbo Zafiras or 1.8 Valvematic Versos. The vast majority of drivers preferred the Vauxhall as quite a few stalled the Versos due to the low torque /clutch combo (of course, as a 1.8 Valvematic Avensis driver I was used to it).

The 1.8 Verso is only available as a CVT. I understand the issue with the clutch take up after owning an Avensis, personally I find that you have to rev the engine a bit too much to avoid stalling. A good engine in terms of economy but a bit coa*** at cruising revs. This might not be a problem in the CVT with higher cruising ratio. Economy is good for a 1.8 auto, around 40mpg. The Real Mpg for the 1.4 Turbo Zafira is disappointing at 34.4 for the manual, 29.5 for auto.

Edited by corax on 06/08/2019 at 20:15

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - SLO76
“The Real Mpg for the 1.4 Turbo Zafira is disappointing at 34.4 for the manual, 29.5 for auto.”

Not bad for such a large car though. Even the smaller Ford C-Max 1.0 Ecoboost barely beats it and the petrol versions of the S-max are worse. Unless the OP is doing a big mileage the added risk and cost of a diesel isn’t worth it especially as the Zafira uses Fiat designed engines which tend to fall off a cliff regarding reliability at 70k upwards.
KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Heidfirst
The 1.8 Verso is only available as a CVT. I understand the issue with the clutch take up after owning an Avensis, personally I find that you have to rev the engine a bit too much to avoid stalling.

must have been 1.6s then as otherwise how could they have had a problem with the clutch & stalling? :P

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Teshy

Wow, thank you all for your considered responses. Admittedly, I wasn't aware just how gutless the engines on the Toyota and Kia were - and think having that little bit of extra torque is something that we'd be looking at.

I did initially look at the Ford C Max Grand and Vauxhall Zafira but for some reason discounted them quickly - perhaps based on (perceived) reliability but perhaps i was too hasty in my decision.

Anyway, just had a look at the two and they probably both fit the bill... we are looking to keep the car for at lease 6/7 years so the Vauxhall may just edge it as we get something slightly newer for our money although they will both be test driven in the next week or two.

I'll follow up with decision/reasons in due course! :) thanks again!

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Heidfirst

Wow, thank you all for your considered responses. Admittedly, I wasn't aware just how gutless the engines on the Toyota and Kia were - and think having that little bit of extra torque is something that we'd be looking at.

Can only speak for the Toyota but they aren't gutless, just that the power is all at the top end (variable valve timing) so it's a very different style of driving from a turbodiesel if you want to make rapid progress.

I know that HJ's favourite version of the Avensis is the 1.8 Multidrive S (CVT) & I can certainly understand why for mainly urban use so quite possibly the Verso 1.8 Multidrive S may be the best petrol Verso.

KIA Carens - vs Totoya Verso - best manual petrol? - Warning

I test drove a a Toyota Verso 1.6 (Petrol) about a couple of years ago. It was dull car to drive. Nothing made me want to own it. It is a shame, because I really wanted to like the car.....

Edited by Warning on 08/08/2019 at 20:29